Association of Estimated Glucose Disposal Rate With the Stenosis Severity of Coronary Artery Disease： A Cross-sectional Study / 中山大学学报(医学科学版)

ObjectiveTo investigate the association between estimated glucose disposal rate （eGDR） and the severity of coronary heart disease. MethodsWe conducted a hospital-based cross-sectional study that included 1258 patients （mean age： 62（53-68） years） who underwent coronary angiography for suspected coronary artery disease （53.9% were male）. Insulin resistance level （IR） was calculated according to eGDR formula： eGDR = 21.158 - （0.09 × WC） - （3.407 × hypertension） - （0.551 × HbA1c） ［hypertension （yes = 1 / no = 0）， HbA1c = HbA1c （%）］. Subjects were grouped according to the eGDR quantile. CAD severity was determined by the number of narrowed vessels： no-obstructive CAD group （all coronary stenosis were<50%， n=704）， Single-vessel CAD group （only one involved major coronary artery stenosis≥50%， n=205）， Multi-vessel CAD group （two or more involved major coronary arteries stenosis≥50%， n=349）； Multivariate logistic regression model was used to analyze the association between eGDR and CAD severity. The linear relationship between eGDR and CAD in the whole range of eGDR was analyzed using restricted cubic spline. Subgroup analyses were used to assess the association between eGDR and CAD severity in different diabetic states. Receiver operating characteristic （ROC） curve analysis were used to evaluate the value of eGDR in improving CAD recognition. ResultsA decrease in the eGDR index was significantly associated with an increased risk of CAD severity （OR： 2.79； 95%CI： 1.72~4.55； P<0.001）. In multivariate logistic regression models， individuals with the lowest quantile of eGDR （T1） were 2.79 times more likely to develop multi-vessel CAD than those with the highest quantile of eGDR （T3） （OR： 2.79； 95%CI： 1.72~4.55； P<0.001）. Multivariate restricted cubic spline analysis showed that eGDR was negatively associated with CAD and multi-vessel CAD （P-nonlinear>0.05）. In non-diabetic patients， compared with the reference group （T3）， the T1 group had a significantly increased risk of CAD （OR： 1.42； 95% CI： 1.00~2.01； P<0.05） and multi-vessel CAD （OR： 1.86； 95%CI： 1.21~2.86； P<0.05）. No statistical association was found between eGDR and CAD in diabetic patients. In ROC curve analysis， when eGDR was added to traditional model for CAD， significant improvements were observed in the model's recognition of CAD and multi-vessel CAD. ConclusionOur study shows eGDR levels are inversely associated with CAD and CAD severity. eGDR， as a non-insulin measure to assess IR， could be a valuable indicator of CAD severity for population.

Clinical Characteristics and Short-Term Outcomes of Patients Presenting with Acute Myocardial Infarction having Multi-vessel disease - A Single Middle- eastern Tertiary-Care Center Experience

Objective: Patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease (MVD) compared to single-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD) have more comorbidities and poor in-hospital outcomes. We aim to analyze MVDAMI patients regarding clinical data and short-term outcomes. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of the prospectively collected data registry, a single-center study reviewing the clinical details and hospital outcome measures of AMI patients referred to our center for early revascularization from 2016 to 2019. Result: Out of 3041 patients presented with AMI, 491 (16%) had MVD on coronary angiogram. MVD-AMI patients were older, had a higher prevalence of DM, HTN, and prior history of ischemic heart disease compared to the non- MVD -AMI group (p < 0.001 for all). However, they presented more with nonanterior myocardial infarction, showed higher rates of post-myocardial infarction LV dysfunction, and mortality (p < 0.001). Older MVD-AMI patients showed higher rates of in-hospital morbidities and mortality compared to younger ones (p < 0.001). MVD- AMI women and Middle Eastern patients were older and showed a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors compared to MVD-AMI men and South Asian patient population respectively. There were no significant differences recorded among the different subgroups of MVD-AMI patients regarding the hospital outcome measures. Conclusion: Our study highlighted the clinical characters and poor outcomes of a high-risk group of MVD-AMI with different demographic backgrounds. Although age was a strong predictor for in-hospital poor outcomes, neither gender nor ethnicity affected the outcomes in them.

Application of SYNTAX score in emergency PCI strategy for STEMI patients with multivessel diseases / 重庆医学

Objective To evaluate the effect of SYNTAX score in the emergency revascularization strategy selection in ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with multi‐vessel disease(MVD) and to analyze the patient′s prognosis and influen‐cing factors .Methods A total of 144 patients with STEMI complicating MVD verified by coronary arterial angiography in the Xin‐qiao Hospital of Third Military Medical University from August 2010 to March 2012 were collected and divided into the once com‐plete revascularization group (CR group) ,staged complete revascularization group (SR group) and incomplete revascularization group (IR group) according to different emergency PCI strategies .The basic clinical conditions and coronary arterial SYNTAX score were recorded .The occurrence rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACCE) during 12 months follow up period was performed the statistics .The results of coronary arterial angiography were collected .The effect of different strategy on prognosis and the risk factors affecting prognosis were analyzed .Results There was no statistically significant difference in the all‐cause mor‐tality between the IR group with the CR and SR groups (P>0 .05) ,while the cerebrovascular event ,repeat revascularization during hospitalization ,AMI and total MACCE occurrence rate had statistical difference between the IR group with the CR and SR groups (P 0 .05) ,while which in moderate lesion had statistical difference among 3 groups(P<0 .05) ,the CR group had the highest occurrence rate of MACCE . Conclusion For the patients with STEMI complicating MVD ,the SYNTAX score can be used as the evidence for selecting reperfu‐sion strategies and applied in emergency PCI .

Evaluation of different revascularization strategies for patients with acute myocardial infarction with lesions of multiple coronary arteries after primary percutaneous coronary intervention and its economic evaluation / 中华危重病急救医学

ObjectiveTo investigate the effect and medical cost of different revascularization strategies for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients with multi-vessel disease (MVD).Methods A prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted. From January 2009 to June 2012, patients with AMI and MVD undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were enrolled. They were randomly assigned to group A [staged PCI for non-infarction related artery (non-IRA) within 7-10 days after AMI] and group B (subsequent PCI for non-IRA recommended only for those with evidence of ischemia). All of patients were given optimized medical therapy according to clinical guideline, and they were followed up for 24 months at regular intervals. Major adverse cardiovascular events(MACE) including recurrence of myocardial infarction and death due to cardiac ailments were recorded. Meanwhile, re-hospitalization from cardiac causes, recurrence of angina, heart failure, and re-PCI, number of stents, total hospital stay days, and total medical expenditure were recorded.Results A total of 428 patients accomplished the 24-month follow up. All the patients underwgennt PCI for non-IRA in group A (215 patients), while 62 patients in group B (213 patients) undergone PCI for myocardial ischemia, and 51 patients received non-IRA treatment. There was no significant difference in MACE incidence between group A and group B [8.4% (18/215) vs. 10.8% (23/213),χ2= 0.727,P = 0.394]. The difference of death rate due to cardiac causes (5.1% vs. 6.6%), recurrence of myocardial infarction (4.2% vs. 6.6%), and heart failure (4.2% vs. 7.0%) were not significantly different between groups A and B (allP> 0.05). The rate of recurrence of angina (14.4 % vs. 32.9%), re-hospitalization from cardiac causes (14.4% vs. 33.8%), and re-treatment of implanting stents (12.6% vs. 29.1%) were significantly lower in group A than group B (allP< 0.01), and the rate of revascularization was significantly higher in group A than group B (10.7% vs. 5.2%,P< 0.05). The total number of stents (610 vs. 366), mean number of stents per patient (2.83±0.91 vs. 1.72±0.91,t = 12.725,P = 0.000), and total cost per patient (kRMB: 63.7±12.6 vs. 51.5±12.3,t = 10.107,P = 0.000) in group A were significantly higher than those in group B. Total hospital stay days in group A was significantly less than group B (days: 8.21±2.45 vs. 9.89±3.23, t = 6.071,P = 0.000). Because non-IRA-vascular reconstruction rate was low in group B, the rate of usingβ-blocker and anti-anginal agents during the 24-month follow up in group B was significantly higher than group A [59.2% (126/213) vs. 47.0% (101/215),χ2= 6.371,P = 0.012; 56.3% (112/213) vs. 17.6% (36/215),χ2 = 64.704,P = 0.000]. Conclusions In patients with AMI and MVD undergone emergency PCI, staged PCI within 7-10 days for non-IRA cannot decrease the incidence of myocardial infarction and death due to cardiac causes, recurrence of angina and rehospitalization for cardiac causes was diminished, and it may increase the number of stents and medical cost significantly.