RESUMO
Objective: To compare the sedation induced by target-controlled infusion of propofol with that by propofol-remifentanil in third molar exaction surgery. Methods: 60 patients for third molar exaction were divided randomly into 2 groups(n = 30): group P(propofol group) and group PR(propofol-remifentanil group). In group P,a titrated infusion of propofol was started until the OAA/S score had reached level 3 in the patients,then the surgery began. In group PR,a infusion of remifentanil with a target plasma concentration of 1 ng /ml and a titrated infusion of propofol was started until the OAA/S score had reached level 3,then the surgery began. In all patients,the heart rate,blood pressure,respiratory rate,oxyhemoglobin saturation and narcotrend index were recorded during the operation. The reactions of the patients in the operation were recorded. The satisfaction of the patients and surgeons was asked. Results: The respiratory rate and the oxyhemoglobin saturation in group PR was lower than those in group P(P ＜ 0. 05). No obvious adverse reaction was observed in the 2 groups. The satisfaction of the patients in the 2 groups was 30 /30 and 30 /30(P＞ 0. 05). Conclusion: The sedation induced by target-controlled infusion of propofol or propofol-remifentanil in third molar extraction is safe. The sedation under target-controlled infusion of propofol-remifentanil is better than that by propofol when inhalating oxygen.
RESUMO
Objective The aim of this study is to compare sedation titrated under target-controlled infusion of propofol and propofol-remifentanil for impacted supernumerary teeth extraction surgery for children. Methods A total of 60 children with anterior maxillary region impacted supernumerary teeth extraction surgery were divided randomly into two groups, namely, propofol group (group P, n=30) and propofol-remifentanil group (group PR, n=30). In group P, a titrated infusion of propofol was started until the modified observer's assessment of alertness/sedation (OAA/S) scale reached level 3 before the actual surgery. In group PR, a remifentanil infusion with a target plasma concentration of 1 ng·mL⁻¹ was started until the operation was finished. A titrated infusion of propofol was also started until the modified OAA/S score reached level 3 before the actual surgery. The Houpt behavior scale was adopted to evaluate the cooperation of each patient in both groups. The heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, oxyhemoglobin saturation, and Narcotrend index, complications, adverse reactions and propofol infusion of all patients were recorded during the operation. Results The Houpt behavior scales in group PR were better than those in group P (P<0.05). The oxyhemoglobin saturation and respiratory rate in group PR were lower than that in group P (P<0.05). The heart rate, blood pressure and NI in two groups were no significant difference (P>0.05). The incidence of respiratory depression and anterograde amnesia in group PR were higher than that in group P (P<0.05). Conclusion Sedation titrated under the target-controlled infusion of propofol and that titrated under propofol-remifentanil for impacted supernumerary teeth extraction surgery for children are safe. The sedation titrated under target-controlled infusion of propofol-remifentanil is better than sedation by propofol when inhaling oxygen.
RESUMO
Objective To investigate the effect of different doses of sufentanil combined with dexmedetomidine ( DEX) on hemodynamic and Narcotrend index ( NI) during pediatric anesthesia induction. Methods A total of 45 children with lower abdominal surgery were randomly divided into three groups evenly: sufentanil 0. 1 μg·kg-1+ DEX (S1 group),sufentanil 0. 2 μg·kg-1+DEX (S2 group),and sufentanil 0. 3μg·kg-1+DEX (S3 group). Patients in each group began with intubation at the peak point of administration. Blood pressure,heart rate,perfusion index (PI) and NI were detected at the baseline (t0), delivering DEX 0.5 μg·kg-1·h-1 and sufentanil intravenously for 5 min (t1),delivering sufentanil for 3 min (t2),time of intubation ( t3 ) ,1 min ( t4 ) ,and 5 min ( t5 ) after intubation. The application rate of atropine and propofol was recorded. Patient recovery time and adverse reactions were observed. Results Compared with basicline value at t0 time point, hemodynamic parameters and NI were decreased at t1 and t2 ,while PI was increased in both groups. At t3 ,t4 ,and t5 ,all of the indicators in S1 group were significantly different from those at t0 ,and also significantly different from those in S2 and S3 group. Six patients were treated with propofol in S1 group and four presented with agitation after operation,more than S2 and S3 groups. Three patients were treatment with atropine in S3 group. Conclusion Sufentanil (0. 2 μg·kg-1 ) combined with dexmedetomidine can be used to induce intubation for pediatric anesthesia with stable hemodynamic profile and low incidence of adverse effects.
RESUMO
Objective To compare the effects of five different target-controlled concentrations of propofol combined with finite concentration of remifentanil on intraoperative awareness,so as to determine the safer and more effective concentration of propofol which could decrease explicit memory and reduce the incidence of intraoperative awareness. Methods One hundred and fifty patients ( ASAⅠ-Ⅱ) were randomly divided into five groups. There was no significant difference between each group in general condition. Before awaking,the target controlled concentration of remifentanil was adjusted to 2. 4 μg·L-1 in all five groups. Groups R1,R2,R3,R4 and R5 also received 0. 9%normal saline,0. 5 mg·L-1,1. 0 mg·L-1,1. 5 mg·L-1 and 2. 0 mg·L-1 of target controlled infusion ( TCI) of propofol, respectively. Narcotrend index ( NI), mean arterial pressure (MAP),heart rate (HR) and t [the time from t1(the time of awareness beginning) to the end of awareness] at t0(the time of adjusting propofol),t1,t2(the period of awareness),t3(wake period end 5 min) were recorded. Elimination of explicit memory after surgery was followed up. Results There were no significant differences in t and NI between groups R1,R2 and R3(P>0. 05). NI of groups R4 and R5 was significantly lower than that in groups R1,R2 and R3(P0. 05). Conclusion Target controlled infusion of remifentanil 2. 4μg·L-1 combined with TCI propofol 1. 0 mg·L-1 does not affect the wakening controllability. The circulation was steadier and explicit memory could be eliminated during intraoperative awakening.
RESUMO
Objective To explore the relationship between Bispectral index （BIS） values,Narcotrend index （NTI） values and the predicted effect-site concentration （EC）during target-controlled infusion of propofol. Methods In 30 patients during target-controlled infusion of propofol,the propofol infusion was set at an initial EC of 0.5 mg/L and increased by 0.5 mg/L steps every 5 min until 5 min after the modified observer＇s assessment of alertness/sedation scale（OAA/S） values reached zero. The predicted EC of propofol,the values of NTI,NTS and BIS were recorded,and the sedation level were examined by the modified OAA/S every 20 s. The predicted EC of propofol and the values of BIS and NTI at LVC and LOC in 5%,50% and 95% of patients were calculated. Results There were good linear correlations between BIS,NTI and the predicted EC of propofol （r2=0.787,0.792）.The predicted EC of propofol at LVC in 5%,50% and 95% of patients were 1.2,1.8 and 2.5 mg/L,respectively. The values of BIS and NTI at LVC in 5%,50% and 95% of patients were 78.2,68.2 and 58.2; 73.9,64.9 and 55.8,respectively.The predicted EC of propofol at LOC in 5%,50% and 95% of patients were 1.6,2.6 and 3.5 mg/L,The values of BIS and NTI at LOC in 5%,50% and 95% of patients were 74.6,58.2 and 41.5,66.2,55.8 and 45.3,respectively. Conclusion During target-controlled infusion of propofol,LVC and LOC occurred within a definite range of predicted effect-site concentrations.There were the good linear correlations between BIS,NTI and the predicted EC of propofol.NTI may be more useful than BIS in predicting LVC and LOC because of the smaller range of values for the two clinical end-points.