Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 21
Filtrar
1.
J. bras. pneumol ; 48(6): e20220270, 2022. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1421936

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Climate change is a huge and present threat to human health. This article aims to deepen the knowledge about the environmental impact of inhaler devices on their carbon footprint for patients and health professionals, providing information that allows a better choice of the type of device to be prescribed for the treatment of asthma and COPD. This narrative and nonsystematic review was carried out by searching databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, SciELO, and EMBASE) for articles published between 2017 and 2022, written in Portuguese or in English, using the search words "inhalation device" OR "environmental." The review showed that global warming cannot be addressed by focusing only on inhaler devices. However, the devices that we use to treat respiratory diseases such as asthma and COPD, which are diseases that are aggravated by climate change, are also causing that change. Therefore, health professionals, patient organizations, and industries should take a lead in health policies to offer affordable alternatives to inhalers containing hydrofluoroalkane.


RESUMO As mudanças climáticas são uma ameaça enorme e presente para a saúde humana. Este artigo visa aprofundar o conhecimento sobre o impacto ambiental dos dispositivos inalatórios na pegada de carbono para pacientes e profissionais de saúde, fornecendo informações que permitem uma melhor escolha do tipo de dispositivo a ser prescrito para o tratamento da asma e da DPOC. Esta revisão narrativa e não sistemática foi realizada por meio de busca nas bases de dados PubMed, Google Acadêmico, SciELO e EMBASE de artigos publicados entre 2017 e 2022, escritos em português ou inglês, utilizando as palavras de busca "inhalation device" OR "environmental". A revisão mostrou que o aquecimento global não pode ser abordado com foco em dispositivos inalatórios apenas. No entanto, os dispositivos que utilizamos para tratar doenças respiratórias como asma e DPOC, que são doenças agravadas pelas mudanças climáticas, também estão causando essa mudança. Portanto, profissionais de saúde, organizações de pacientes e indústrias devem assumir a liderança nas políticas de saúde para oferecer alternativas acessíveis aos inaladores contendo hidrofluoralcano.

2.
Einstein (Säo Paulo) ; 20: eAO6412, 2022. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-1364799

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Objective To investigate whether different genotypes of p.Arg16Gly, p.Gln27Glu, p.Arg19Cys and p.Thr164Ile variants interfere in response to treatment in children and adolescents with moderate to severe acute asthma. Methods This sample comprised patients aged 2 to 17 years with a history of at least two wheezing episodes and current moderate to severe asthma exacerbation. All patients received multiple doses of albuterol and ipratropium bromide delivered via pressurized metered-dose inhaler with holding chamber and systemic corticosteroids. Hospital admission was defined as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were changes in forced expiratory volume in the first second after 1 hour of treatment, and for outpatients, length of stay in the emergency room. Variants were genotyped by sequencing. Results A total of 60 patients were evaluated. Hospital admission rates were significantly higher in carriers of the genotype AA relative to those with genotype AG or GG, within the p.Arg16Gly variant (p=0.03, test χ2, alpha=0.05). Secondary outcomes did not differ between genotypes. Conclusion Hospital admission rates were significantly higher among carriers of the genotype AA within the p.Arg16Gly variant. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01323010


Assuntos
Humanos , Pré-Escolar , Criança , Adolescente , Asma/genética , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2/genética , Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2/uso terapêutico , Nebulizadores e Vaporizadores , Inaladores Dosimetrados , Albuterol/uso terapêutico
3.
Cambios rev. méd ; 20(1): 74-79, 30 junio 2021.
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: biblio-1292925

RESUMO

INTRODUCCIÓN. Para el tratamiento farmacoterapéutico de enfermedades respi-ratorias, el uso de herramientas para abordar la vía inhalatoria es de elección por su mayor eficacia y menos efectos secundarios; registrar su adhesión y prevalencia es importante. OBJETIVO. Determinar el nivel y la prevalencia de adhesión al uso de inhaladores en pacientes con Asma y Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Cróni-ca. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS. Estudio analítico transversal. Población de 215 y muestra de 121 Historias Clínicas. Se aplicó el Test de Adhesión a Inhaladores, que consistió en dos cuestionarios complementarios: el de 10 ítems, que valoró el nivel de adhesión, y el de 12 que identificó el tipo de incumplimiento en pacientes de Consulta Externa de la Unidad Técnica de Neumología del Hospital de Especialidades Carlos Andrade Marín, periodo julio 2018 - enero 2019. La tabulación y análisis de datos se realizó con el programa Excel. RESULTADOS. La prevalencia de mala adhesión en asmáticos fue de 83,33% y en Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica 13,33%. En cuanto al sexo, la prevalencia de mala adhesión fue de 15,28% en hombres y de 40,82% en mujeres, con una p<0,05. No se encontró diferencia significativa respecto a los niveles de instrucción. CONCLUSIÓN. La prevalencia de mala adhesión al uso de inhaladores en pacientes con Asma y Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica fue alta sobre todo en los asmáticos.


INTRODUCTION. For respiratory diseases and their pharmacotherapeutic treatment, the use of tools to address the inhalation route is chosen due to its greater efficacy and fewer secondary effects; then record the adherence and prevalence is important. OBJECTIVE. To determine both level and prevalence of adherence to the use of inhalers in patients with Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. MATE-RIALS AND METHODS. Cross-sectional analytical study. Population of 215 and sam-ple of 121 patients. The Inhaler Adherence Test was applied, which consisted of two complementary questionnaires: a 10-item questionnaire, which assessed the level of adherence, and a 12-item questionnaire that identified the type of non-compliance in patients of the Pneumology Technical Unit of the Hospital de Especialidades Carlos Andrade Marín, period July 2018 - January 2019. The tabulation and data analysis was performed with Microsoft Excel program. RESULTS. The prevalence of poor ad-herence in asthmatics was 83.33% and in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease was 13.3%. Regarding gender, the prevalence of poor adherence was 15.28% in men and 40.82% in women, with a p <0.05. No significant differences were found regarding the levels of instruction. CONCLUSION. The prevalence of poor adherence to the use of inhalers in patients with Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease was high, especially in asthmatics


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adolescente , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Adulto Jovem , Doenças Respiratórias , Asma , Nebulizadores e Vaporizadores , Pneumologia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica , Cooperação e Adesão ao Tratamento , Terapia Respiratória , Broncodilatadores , Conduta do Tratamento Medicamentoso , Adesão à Medicação , Inaladores de Pó Seco
4.
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy ; (12): 1221-1224, 2019.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-797130

RESUMO

Objective@#To investigate the clinical efficacy of atomization inhalation combined with montelukast in the treatment of children with post infectious cough.@*Methods@#From January 2016 to January 2018, 100 children with post-infection cough were selected and randomly divided into two groups according to the digital table, with 50 cases in each group.The observation group was treated with oral budesonide atomization inhalation.The control group was not given drugs.The clinical efficacy, symptom score, pulmonary function index, inflammatory factor index and adverse reaction were compared between the two groups.@*Results@#The total effective rate in the observation group was higher than that in the control group[96%(48/50) vs.80%(40/50), P<0.05]. After treatment, the scores of daytime cough, nocturnal cough and expectoration in both two groups were lower than those before treatment(all P<0.05), which in the observation group were lower than those in the control group(all P<0.05). After treatment, the two pulmonary function indicators of FEV1, FEV1/FVC in the observation group were higher than those in the control group(all P<0.05), and the inflammatory cytokines such as CRPIL-6, TNF-α in the observation group were lower than those in the control group(all P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the total incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups[6%(3/50)比4%(2/50), P>0.05].@*Conclusion@#The combination of oral montelukast and budesonide atomization inhalation can effectively treat children with cough after infection, relieve their symptoms, improve the lung function, suppress the inflammatory reaction of respiratory tract, and it is safe and reliable.

5.
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy ; (12): 1221-1224, 2019.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-744529

RESUMO

Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of atomization inhalation combined with montelukast in the treatment of children with post infectious cough.Methods From January 2016 to January 2018,100 children with post-infection cough were selected and randomly divided into two groups according to the digital table,with 50 cases in each group.The observation group was treated with oral budesonide atomization inhalation.The control group was not given drugs.The clinical efficacy,symptom score,pulmonary function index,inflammatory factor index and adverse reaction were compared between the two groups.Results The total effective rate in the observation group was higher than that in the control group [96% (48/50) vs.80% (40/50),P < 0.05].After treatment,the scores of daytime cough,nocturnal cough and expectoration in both two groups were lower than those before treatment (all P <0.05),which in the observation group were lower than those in the control group(all P < 0.05).After treatment,the two pulmonary function indicators of FEV1,FEV1/FVC in the observation group were higher than those in the control group(all P < 0.05),and the inflammatory cytokines such as CRPIL-6,TNF-α in the observation group were lower than those in the control group(all P < 0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in the total incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups [6% (3/50) 比 4% (2/50),P > 0.05].Conclusion The combination of oral montelukast and budesonide atomization inhalation can effectively treat children with cough after infection,relieve their symptoms,improve the lung function,suppress the inflammatory reaction of respiratory tract,and it is safe and reliable.

6.
Einstein (Säo Paulo) ; 17(2): eAO4397, 2019. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-1001909

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Objective: To demonstrate the most frequent errors in inhalation technique in patients with asthma undergoing treatment at a tertiary care hospital. Methods: A cross-sectional study with a convenience sample of asthma patients aged 18 years or over, treated at a pulmonology outpatient clinic of a tertiary care hospital. The assessment of inhalation technique of users of the dry powder inhalers Aerolizer®, Aerocaps and Diskus®, or metered-dose inhalers was based on the manufacturer's instructions for use of each inhaler device. Patients demonstrated the inhalation technique with empty inhaler devices, and it was considered correct when all stages were performed properly, or when errors probably did not interfere with the treatment outcome. Results: Among 71 participants, 43 (60.5%) performed inhalation technique incorrectly. Among metered-dose inhalers and dry powder inhalers users, inhalation technique errors were found in 84.2% and 51.9%, respectively (p=0.013). Errors were more frequent at the exhalation stage (67.4%), followed by breathing in (58.1%) and apnea (51.2%). In the group using dry powder inhalers, the most common errors occurred during exhalation and, for those using metered-dose inhalers, the most compromised stage was aspiration. Conclusion: Errors were more frequent among those using metered-dose inhalers compared with dry powder inhalers. Misconceptions are more common at the expiration stage among users of dry powder inhalers and in aspiration among those on metered-dose inhalers.


RESUMO Objetivo: Demonstrar os erros mais frequentes na técnica inalatória de pacientes com asma brônquica em tratamento em hospital terciário. Métodos: Estudo transversal, com amostra de conveniência de pacientes com asma, com 18 anos ou mais, em tratamento em ambulatório de pneumologia de um hospital terciário. A avaliação da técnica inalatória dos usuários dos dispositivos de pó seco Aerolizer ®, Aerocaps® ou Diskus®, ou de aerossóis dosimetrados teve como base as orientações da bula do fabricante de cada dispositivo inalatório. Os pacientes demonstraram a técnica inalatória com dispositivos inalatórios vazios, e ela foi considerada correta quando todas as etapas foram realizadas de forma apropriada, ou quando os equívocos provavelmente não interferiam no resultado do tratamento. Resultados: Entre os 71 participantes, 43 (60,5%) realizaram a técnica inalatória de forma incorreta. Dentre os usuários de aerossóis dosimetrados e dispositivos de pó seco, ocorreram erros de técnica inalatória em 84,2% e 51,9%, respectivamente (p=0,013). Os erros foram mais frequentes na etapa da expiração (67,4%), seguidos da aspiração (58,1%) e da apneia (51,2%). No grupo que usava dispositivos de pó seco, os erros mais comuns aconteceram na expiração e, nos que utilizavam aerossóis dosimetrados, a etapa mais comprometida foi a aspiração. Conclusão: Os erros foram mais frequentes entre os que usavam aerossóis dosimetrados em comparação com dispositivos de pó seco. Os equívocos foram mais comuns na etapa da expiração entre os usuários de dispositivos de pó seco e na aspiração entre os que usavam aerossóis dosimetrados.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Adulto Jovem , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Administração por Inalação , Erros de Medicação , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Autoadministração/normas , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Estudos Transversais , Inaladores Dosimetrados , Inaladores de Pó Seco/instrumentação , Centros de Atenção Terciária
7.
J. bras. pneumol ; 45(3): e20170351, 2019. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-1012549

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Objective: Home nebulizers are routinely used in the treatment of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). This study aims to evaluate the contamination of nebulizers used for CF patients, that are chronically colonized by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and the association of nebulizer contamination with cleaning, decontamination and drying practices. Methods: A cross-sectional, observational, multicenter study was conducted in seven CF reference centers in Brazil to obtain data from medical records, structured interviews with patients/caregivers were performed, and nebulizer's parts (interface and cup) were collected for microbiological culture. Results: overall, 77 CF patients were included. The frequency of nebulizer contamination was 71.6%. Candida spp. (52.9%), Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (11.9%), non-mucoid P. aeruginosa (4.8%), Staphylococcus aureus (4.8%) and Burkholderia cepacia complex (2.4%) were the most common isolated pathogens. The frequency of nebulizers' hygiene was 97.4%, and 70.3% of patients reported cleaning, disinfection and drying the nebulizers. The use of tap water in cleaning method and outdoor drying of the parts significantly increased (9.10 times) the chance of nebulizers' contamination. Conclusion: Despite the high frequency hygiene of the nebulizers reported, the cleaning and disinfection methods used were often inadequate. A significant proportion of nebulizers was contaminated with potentially pathogenic microorganisms for CF patients. These findings support the need to include patients/caregivers in educational programs and / or new strategies for delivering inhaled antibiotics.


RESUMO Objetivo: Nebulizadores caseiros são usados rotineiramente no tratamento de pacientes com fibrose cística (FC). Este estudo objetiva avaliar a contaminação de nebulizadores utilizados por pacientes de FC que estão cronicamente colonizados por Pseudomonas aeruginosa e a associação da contaminação do nebulizador com a higienização, esterilização e método de secagem. Métodos: Um estudo transversal, observacional, multicêntrico foi conduzido em sete centros de referência de FC no Brasil para obter dados de registros médicos; foram feitas entrevistas estruturadas com os pacientes/cuidadores e partes de nebulizadores (máscara e copo) foram coletados para cultura microbiológica. Resultados: No geral, 77 pacientes com FC foram incluídos. A frequência da contaminação do nebulizador foi de 71,6%. Candida spp. (52,9%), Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (11,9%), P. aeruginosa não mucoide (4,8%), Staphylococcus aureus (4,8%) e complexo Burkholderia cepacia (2.4%) foram os patógenos isolados mais comuns. A frequência de higienização dos nebulizadores foi de 97,4%, e 70,3% dos pacientes relata higienização, esterilização e secagem dos aparelhos. A lavagem com água da torneira e secagem das partes no tempo, em espaço aberto, aumentou significativamente (9 a 10 vezes) a chance de contaminação dos nebulizadores. Conclusões: Apesar dos relatos de frequente higienização dos nebulizadores, os métodos de limpeza e esterilização usados eram inadequados. Uma proporção significativa de nebulizadores foi contaminada com microrganismos potencialmente patogênicos para pacientes com FC. Estes resultados apoiam a necessidade de inclusão dos pacientes/cuidadores em programas educacionais e/ou novas estratégias para fornecimento de antibióticos inalatórios.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Criança , Adolescente , Adulto , Adulto Jovem , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/isolamento & purificação , Nebulizadores e Vaporizadores/microbiologia , Contaminação de Equipamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Fibrose Cística/terapia , Valores de Referência , Brasil , Contagem de Colônia Microbiana , Modelos Logísticos , Descontaminação/métodos , Descontaminação/estatística & dados numéricos , Desinfecção/métodos , Desinfecção/estatística & dados numéricos , Contaminação de Equipamentos/prevenção & controle , Estudos Transversais
8.
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy ; (12): 3583-3586, 2017.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-668836

RESUMO

Objective To study the clinical effect of massage therapy on infants and young children with asthmatic disease.Methods 100 infants and young children with asthmatic disease were selected.The children and parents who agreed to cooperate with massage therapy were enrolled as treatment group.The children and parents who were unwilling to cooperate with massage therapy,but willing to cooperate with home aerosol therapy were enrolled as control group,50 cases in each group.The two groups of children took comprehensive treatment measures,the treatment group was given massage therapy,the control group was given home aerosol therapy.The therapeutic effects of the two groups were compared and analyzed.Results The respite time,recurrent frequency of wheezing within 1 year,respiratory infection occurred within 1 year,number of re-hospitalization within 1 year of the control group were (5.6 ± 1.36) d,(2.35 ± 1.13) times,(2.96 ± 1.22) times,(0.85 ± 0.58) times,which of the treatment group were (5.82 ± 1.44) d,(2.31 ± 1.09) times,(2.89 ± 1.19) times,(0.86 ± 0.51) times,the differences were not statistically significant between the two groups (t=0.573,0.417,0.523,0.872,all P >0.05).The peak time before treatment,1 month after treatment and 6 months after treatment,and the peak volume ratio before treatment,1 month after treatment and 6 months after treatment between the two groups had no statistically significant differences(all P > 0.05).Conclusion Massage therapy can achieve the same effect with the home aerosol therapy,the method is simple,easy,without any adverse reactions,it is worthy of clinical promotion.

9.
Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology ; (12): 1520-1523, 2017.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-709679

RESUMO

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of domestic electronic vaporizer when used for sevoflurane anesthesia in rabbits.Methods Ninety healthy pathogen-free New Zealand rabbits of both sexes,aged 4-5 months,weighing 2.5-3.5 kg,were divided into 3 groups (n=30 each) using a random number table:mechanical vaporizer group (group M),domestic electronic vaporizer group (group E) and Zeus electronic vaporizer group (group Z).In group M,the mechanical vaporizer was used,the sevoflurane vaporizer dial was adjusted to 2%,with the fresh air flow set at 2 L/min.In E and Z groups,BR850 domestic electronic vaporizer and Zeus electronic vaporizer were used,respectively,and the concentration of sevoflurane inhaled was 2%.Sevoflurane was inhaled for 2 h in each group.The formula method and weighing method were used to calculate the consumption of sevoflurane in group M.The electronic calculation method and weighing method were used to calculate the consumption of sevoflurane in Z and E groups.The stable value of end-tidal sevoflurane concentration (ETCsev) and time for ETCsev reaching the stable value were recorded.ETCsev was recorded every 10 min after reaching the stable value (T1T12).Results Compared with group M,the consumption of sevoflurane (weighing method) was significantly reduced,and the time for ETCsev reaching the stable value was shortened in Z and E groups (P< 0.05).Compared with group Z,the consumption of sevoflurane (weighing method) was significantly increased (P<0.05),and no significant change was found in the time for ETCsev reaching the stable value in group E (P>0.05).Compared with the consumption of sevoflurane (weighing method),no significant change was found in the consumption of sevoflurane (electronic method) in group Z (P>0.05),and the consumption of sevoflurane (electronic method) was significantly increased in group E (P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the stable value of ETCsev between the three groups (P<0.05).There was no significant difference in ETCsev between and within groups (P>0.05).Conclusion The domestic electronic vaporizer achieves automatic and precise control of volatile concentrations of inhalation anesthetics and can be effectively used for sevoflurane anesthesia in rabbits.When compared with Zeus electronic vaporizer,the precision of the domestic electronic vaporizer needs further improvement,but the cost is obviously low,the compatibility is strong,and it has clinical application value.

10.
Rev. chil. enferm. respir ; 33(2): 118-130, 2017.
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: biblio-1042616

RESUMO

Los cigarrillos electrónicos (Cig-e) son dispositivos que contienen un líquido compuesto por un solvente, saborizantes y, en la mayoría de los casos, nicotina. Este liquido, al ser calentado en el dispositivo, se vaporiza, siendo aspirado por el usuario. En los últimos años, el uso de los Cig-e ha aumentado rápidamente, especialmente entre escolares y gente joven, sin existir hasta el día de hoy evidencias ciertas sobre su seguridad y efectos a largo plazo. En este artículo revisamos la evidencia existente en cuanto a los efectos y seguridad de cada uno de los componentes de los Cig-e y analizamos sus potenciales indicaciones en distintos escenarios clínicos.


Electronic cigarettes (Cig-e) are devices that contain a liquid composed of a solvent, flavors and, in most cases, nicotine. This liquid, when heated in the device, vaporizes, being aspirated by the user. In recent years, the use of Cig-e has increased rapidly, especially among schoolchildren and young people, with no clear evidence of safety and long-term effects to date. In this article we review the existing evidence regarding the effects and safety of each of the components of Cig-e and analyze their potential indications in different clinical scenarios.


Assuntos
Humanos , Abandono do Uso de Tabaco/métodos , Sistemas Eletrônicos de Liberação de Nicotina , Segurança , Solventes/administração & dosagem , Solventes/análise , Nebulizadores e Vaporizadores , Exposição Materna , Aerossóis/administração & dosagem , Aerossóis/análise , Aromatizantes , Nicotina/administração & dosagem , Nicotina/análise
11.
J. bras. pneumol ; 42(6): 440-443, Nov.-Dec. 2016. graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-1040262

RESUMO

ABSTRACT To assess the impact that educational interventions to improve inhaler techniques have on the clinical and functional control of asthma and COPD, we evaluated 44 participants before and after such an intervention. There was a significant decrease in the number of errors, and 20 patients (46%) significantly improved their technique regarding prior exhalation and breath hold. In the asthma group, there were significant improvements in the mean FEV1, FVC, and PEF (of 6.4%, 8.6%, and 8.3% respectively). Those improvements were accompanied by improvements in Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test scores but not in Asthma Control Test scores. In the COPD group, there were no significant variations. In asthma patients, educational interventions appear to improve inhaler technique, clinical control, and functional control.


RESUMO Para avaliar o impacto do ensino da técnica inalatória no controle clínico e funcional de pacientes com asma ou DPOC, incluíram-se 44 participantes antes e após essa intervenção. Houve uma diminuição significativa no número de erros cometidos, sendo que 20 pacientes (46%) melhoraram significativamente sua técnica na expiração prévia e apneia final. No grupo asma, houve significativa melhora nas médias de FEV1 (6,4%), CVF (8,6%) e PFE (8,3%), e essa melhora correlacionou-se com os resultados no Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test, mas não com os do Asthma Control Test. No grupo DPOC, não houve variações significativas. O ensino da técnica inalatória parece melhorar seu desempenho e os controles clínico e funcional em pacientes com asma.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Asma/prevenção & controle , Nebulizadores e Vaporizadores/normas , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/prevenção & controle , Portugal , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/normas , Estudos Controlados Antes e Depois
12.
Chongqing Medicine ; (36): 4396-4398,4402, 2015.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-602639

RESUMO

Objective To investigate oxygen nebulizer usage among inpatients in an upper first‐class hospital so that this de‐vice can be used by medical personnel and patients properly .Methods Totally 409 patients were investigated about the usage of the device from May 12th to 30th 2014 ,whose outcomes were analyzed by Excel2007 software .Results The total liquid volume of in‐halation on prescription was much larger than the favorable one ,ranging from 4 to 6 mL .And the Oxygen flow ,ranging from 2 .5 to 3 .5 L/min ,was much lower than the normal flow (ranging from 6 to 8 L/min) .In addition ,all patients failed to breathe normally with occasional deep breaths and failed to gargle timely after corticosteroid inhalation .Only 3% patients cleaned their faces after corticosteroid inhalation ,43 .5% patients sit in an upright position ,44 .0% patients kept the nebulizer vertical during treatment .The accuracy rates of mouthpiece position ,the right time to stop nebulizer therapy ,rinsing the nebulizer with sterile or distilled water and allowing to air dry were 95 .1% ,99 .2% ,and 99 .3% ,respectively .Conclusion There are many common patient use nebulizer incorrectlly in the upper first‐class hospital ,and education and guidance by medical personnel should be strengthened .

13.
J. bras. pneumol ; 40(2): 119-127, Mar-Apr/2014. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-709762

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe the pathogens found in home nebulizers and in respiratory samples of cystic fibrosis (CF) patients, and to evaluate the effect that a standardized instruction regarding cleaning and disinfection of nebulizers has on the frequency of nebulizer contamination. METHODS: We included 40 CF patients (22 males), all of whom used the same model of nebulizer. The median patient age was 11.2 ± 3.74 years. We collected samples from the nebulizer mouthpiece and cup, using a sterile swab moistened with sterile saline. Respiratory samples were collected by asking patients to expectorate into a sterile container or with oropharyngeal swabs after cough stimulation. Cultures were performed on selective media, and bacteria were identified by classical biochemical tests. Patients received oral and written instructions regarding the cleaning and disinfection of nebulizers. All determinations were repeated an average of two months later. RESULTS: Contamination of the nebulizer (any part) was detected in 23 cases (57.5%). The nebulizer mouthpiece and cup were found to be contaminated in 16 (40.0%) and 19 (47.5%), respectively. After the standardized instruction had been given, there was a significant decrease in the proportion of contaminated nebulizers (43.5%). CONCLUSIONS: In our sample of CF patients, nebulizer contamination was common, indicating the need for improvement in patient practices regarding the cleaning and disinfection of their nebulizers. A one-time educational intervention could have a significant positive impact. .


OBJETIVO: Descrever os patógenos encontrados nos nebulizadores de uso domiciliar e nas amostras de trato respiratório de pacientes com fibrose cística (FC) e verificar o efeito de uma instrução padronizada de higiene e desinfecção de nebulizadores na contaminação dos mesmos. MÉTODOS: Foram incluídos no estudo 40 pacientes com FC (22 do sexo masculino) que utilizavam um mesmo modelo de nebulizador. A mediana de idade foi de 11,2 ± 3,74 anos. Amostras dos nebulizadores foram coletadas do bocal e do copo reservatório utilizando-se um swab estéril umedecido em solução salina estéril. As amostras de trato respiratório dos pacientes foram colhidas por expectoração em coletor estéril ou com swab de orofaringe após estímulo de tosse. As culturas foram realizadas em meios seletivos, e a identificação bacteriana foi feita através de provas bioquímicas clássicas. Instruções verbais e escritas sobre higiene e desinfecção dos nebulizadores foram ministradas. Todas as determinações foram repetidas dois meses após, em média. RESULTADOS: A contaminação de alguma parte dos nebulizadores foi observada em 23 casos (57,5%). A contaminação do bocal e do copo foi similar, em 16 (40.0%) e 19 casos (47.5%), respectivamente. Houve uma redução significativa da proporção de nebulizadores contaminados (43,5%) após a instrução padronizada. CONCLUSÕES: Nesta amostra de pacientes com FC, a contaminação dos nebulizadores foi alta, o que indica a necessidade de melhoria nas práticas de higiene e desinfecção dos nebulizadores de pacientes com FC. Uma única intervenção educacional pode ter um impacto positivo significativo. .


Assuntos
Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Fibrose Cística/microbiologia , Desinfecção , Contaminação de Equipamentos , Máscaras/microbiologia , Nebulizadores e Vaporizadores/microbiologia , Cuidadores , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Inquéritos e Questionários , Escarro/microbiologia
14.
Journal of the Korean Medical Association ; : 155-158, 2014.
Artigo em Coreano | WPRIM | ID: wpr-166823

RESUMO

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the highest ranking diseases with regard to prevalence and mortality in Korea and also worldwide. In the past decade, effective inhaler medications for COPD treatment have been developed or approved. These inhaler medications have been proven to have beneficial effects on symptoms, lung function, quality of life, exercise capacity, and exacerbation. The inhalers used widely are long-acting anticholinergics, long-acting beta2-agonists, and combined inhalers of a corticosteroid and long-acting beta2-agonist. These inhaler medications are more effective than oral medications and less likely to produce adverse events. However, the inhaler medications should be used appropriately to achieve the desired effect. For COPD patients with a forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) less than 80% of the predicted value, a long-acting anticholinergic or long-acting beta2-agonist is usually the medication of first choice. If a COPD patient with a FEV1 less than 60% of the predicted value suffers frequent exacerbations, a combined inhaler of corticosteroid and long-acting beta2-agonist is a good choice. To prescribe an inhaler medication for COPD patients, spirometry should be performed, not only to confirm the diagnosis but also to define severity. These effective inhaler medications should be used widely for COPD patients in Korea.


Assuntos
Humanos , Corticosteroides , Antagonistas Colinérgicos , Diagnóstico , Volume Expiratório Forçado , Coreia (Geográfico) , Pulmão , Mortalidade , Nebulizadores e Vaporizadores , Prevalência , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica , Qualidade de Vida , Espirometria
15.
Pulmäo RJ ; 22(3): 14-19, 2013.
Artigo em Português | LILACS | ID: lil-707431

RESUMO

As doenças do trato respiratório têm uma elevada prevalência emnosso meio. A via inalatória é a preferida para a administração da terapia. Vários dispositivos, com diferentes características, estão disponíveis no mercado. Esta revisão teve o objetivo de descrever os tipos de dispositivos, suas vantagens e desvantagens, e indicações de uso conforme cada faixa etária, além de abordar alguns aspectos técnicos relevantes para a obtenção de melhores resultados com a terapia inalatória. Evidências científicas enfatizam novas formas de administração de medicação inalatória. Nebulizadores convencionais apresentam numerosos inconvenientes. Aerossóis com espaçadores/aerocâmaras permitem melhora na deposição pulmonar, resultando, principalmente em pacientes sem coordenação adequada, em uma melhor relação custo-benefício do que outros métodos tradicionalmente utilizados. Naqueles que conseguem gerar altos fluxos inspiratórios, os inaladores de pó seco podem ser utilizados.


The prevalence of respiratory diseases is high in Brazil. Inhalation isthe preferred route of delivery for therapy. Various inhalation devices, with different characteristics, are available. The objective of this review was to describe those devices, their advantages, disadvantages, and indications for each age group, as well as to address certain relevant technical aspects of obtaining optimal results with inhalation therapy. New means of delivering inhaled therapy have been described. Conventional nebulizers have a number of disadvantages. Aerosol inhalation via spacers or holding chambers seems to be another method, resulting, specifically in patients without adequate coordination, in a relative superior cost-benefit relationship in comparison with traditional methods. In patients who can generate high inspiratory flow rates, dry power inhalers can be used.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Administração por Inalação , Aerossóis/administração & dosagem , Doenças Respiratórias/epidemiologia , Nebulizadores e Vaporizadores/normas , Nebulizadores e Vaporizadores , Terapia Respiratória
16.
Rev. méd. Chile ; 140(11): 1425-1430, nov. 2012. graf, tab
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: lil-674008

RESUMO

Background: In patients with an artificial airway, inspired gases can be humidified and heated using a passive (heat and moisture exchange filter - HMEF), or an active system (heated humidifier). Aim: To assess how humidification is carried out and what is the usual clinical practice in this field in Chilean intensive care units (ICUs). Material and Methods: A specific survey to evaluate humidification system features as well as caregivers' preferences regarding humidification systems, was carried out on the same day in all Chilean ICUs. Results: Fifty-five ICUs were contacted and 44 of them completed the survey. From a total of 367 patients, 254 (69%) required humidification because they were breathing through an artificial airway. A heated humidifier was employed only in 12 patients (5%). Forty-three ICUs (98%) used HMEF as their routine humidification system. In 52% of surveyed ICUs, heated humidifiers were not available. Conclusions: In Chile the main method to humidify and heat inspired gases in patients with an artificial airway is the HMEF. Although there are clear indications for the use of heated humidifiers, they are seldom employed.


Assuntos
Adulto , Humanos , Manuseio das Vias Aéreas/métodos , Umidade , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Chile , Intubação Intratraqueal , Nebulizadores e Vaporizadores , Respiração Artificial
17.
Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences) ; (6): 683-687, 2012.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-424054

RESUMO

This review will discuss aerosol device technologies available for pulmonary vaccine deliveries.The possibilities of adopting aerosol-generation for the purpose of pulmonary immunization are described.Aerosol-generation systems might offer advantages in respect to vaccine stability and antigenicity.The noninvasive,relatively safe and low-cost net of pulmonary delivery may provide great benefits to the public health vaccination campaign.

18.
J. bras. pneumol ; 37(5): 584-588, set.-out. 2011. tab
Artigo em Português | LILACS | ID: lil-604384

RESUMO

OBJETIVO: O conhecimento sobre o manejo da asma aguda em crianças é um tema pouco explorado. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar o conhecimento de profissionais de saúde do Recife (PE) sobre o assunto. MÉTODOS: Estudo transversal de tipo inquérito com 27 médicos e 7 enfermeiros, com mais de 2 anos de trabalho, de dois grandes hospitais-escola de pediatria do Recife, avaliados através de questionários autoaplicáveis com questões fechadas. RESULTADOS: Tanto os pediatras quanto os enfermeiros apresentaram conhecimento inadequado sobre o uso de inaladores dosimetrados, nebulização, tipo e dosagem dos medicamentos, assim como técnicas de descontaminação e desinfecção do material. CONCLUSÕES: O conhecimento inadequado do manejo da asma aguda em crianças pode refletir em um tratamento menos efetivo nesses hospitais. Medidas educativas são necessárias para minimizar o problema.


OBJECTIVE: Knowledge of acute asthma management in children is a subject that has rarely been explored. The objective of this study was to assess the level of such knowledge among health professionals in the city of Recife, Brazil. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional survey involving 27 pediatricians and 7 nurses, all with at least two years of professional experience, at two large pediatric teaching hospitals in Recife. The participants completed a self-administered multiple-choice questionnaire. RESULTS: The pediatricians and nurses all possessed insufficient knowledge regarding the use of metered dose inhalers, nebulization, and types/doses of medications, as well as techniques for decontamination and disinfection of the equipment. CONCLUSIONS: Insufficient knowledge of acute asthma management in children can lead to less effective treatment in hospitals such as those evaluated here. Educational programs should be developed in order to minimize this problem.


Assuntos
Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Asma/terapia , Competência Clínica/normas , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Pessoal de Saúde/normas , Doença Aguda , Brasil , Estudos Transversais , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/métodos , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/normas , Hospitais Pediátricos , Hospitais de Ensino , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários
19.
J. bras. pneumol ; 37(3): 341-347, maio-jun. 2011. tab
Artigo em Português | LILACS | ID: lil-592663

RESUMO

OBJETIVO: Determinar se os nebulizadores de pacientes com fibrose cística são fonte de contaminação microbiana e verificar se a técnica e a frequência de desinfecção dos nebulizadores é apropriada. MÉTODOS: Estudo de corte transversal observacional, sem grupo controle. Foram coletadas amostras de 28 pacientes com fibrose cística, no domicílio do paciente, sem aviso prévio sobre o motivo da visita. Foram colhidas três amostras por paciente: do reservatório do nebulizador, da máscara/bocal e do próprio paciente (swab da orofaringe/escarro). As amostras foram acondicionadas adequadamente e levadas para análise. Os pacientes, seus pais ou responsáveis preencheram um questionário sobre métodos de limpeza e desinfecção dos nebulizadores. RESULTADOS: Foram obtidas 84 amostras dos 28 pacientes. Destes, 15 (53,5 por cento) eram do gênero masculino. A mediana de idade foi de 11 anos (variação: 1-27 anos). Dos 28 pacientes, 15 apresentaram culturas de escarro/orofaringe positivas. As bactérias encontradas com maior frequencia foram Streptococcus aureus (8/15) e Pseudomonas aeruginosa (4/15). A cultura obtida dos nebulizadores identificou diversos patógenos, sem nenhum predominante. Não houve associações entre os resultados das culturas obtidas dos nebulizadores e aquelas dos pacientes em 27 casos (96,7 por cento). A limpeza e a desinfecção não eram realizadas de forma adequada em 22 casos (78,6 por cento). CONCLUSÕES: Nesta amostra de pacientes, apesar das técnicas de desinfecção inadequadas, os nebulizadores não foram uma fonte de contaminação microbiana.


OBJECTIVE: To determine whether nebulizers are a source of microbial contamination in patients with cystic fibrosis, as well as whether the technique and frequency of disinfection of these devices is appropriate. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional, uncontrolled observational study. Samples were collected from 28 patients with cystic fibrosis. Samples were collected at the homes of the patients, who were not previously informed of the purpose of the visit. Three samples were collected from each patient: one from the nebulizer chamber, one from the mask/mouthpiece, and one from the patient (oropharyngeal swab /sputum). The samples were properly stored and taken for analyses. The patients, their parents, or their legal guardians completed a questionnaire regarding nebulizer cleaning and disinfecting methods. RESULTS: We collected 84 samples from the 28 patients. Of those 28 patients, 15 (53.5 percent) were male. The median age of the patients was 11 years (range, 1-27 years). Of the 28 patients, 15 presented with positive oropharyngeal swab /sputum sample cultures. The most common bacterial isolates were Staphylococcus aureus (in 8 patients) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (in 4 patients). Although the samples obtained from the nebulizers presented with various pathogens in culture, no specific species predominated. In 27 cases (96.7 percent), there were no associations between the samples obtained from the nebulizers and those obtained from the patients in terms of the results of the cultures. Cleaning and disinfection of nebulizers were inappropriate in 22 cases (78.6 percent). CONCLUSIONS: In this sample of patients, despite the inappropriate disinfection techniques, nebulizers were not found to be a source of microbial contamination.


Assuntos
Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Adulto Jovem , Fibrose Cística/microbiologia , Desinfecção/normas , Contaminação de Equipamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Máscaras/microbiologia , Nebulizadores e Vaporizadores/microbiologia , Escarro/microbiologia , Estudos Transversais , Desinfecção/estatística & dados numéricos , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/isolamento & purificação , Staphylococcus aureus/isolamento & purificação
20.
J. bras. pneumol ; 35(9): 824-831, set. 2009. ilus, tab
Artigo em Português | LILACS | ID: lil-528386

RESUMO

OBJETIVO: Avaliar a compreensão e a técnica de uso dos dispositivos inalatórios prescritos de pacientes com asma ou DPOC atendidos em um hospital-escola terciário. MÉTODOS: Os pacientes foram avaliados na sala de pós-consulta sem que o médico soubesse do estudo. Foi solicitado que o paciente demonstrasse como utiliza a medicação inalatória e, em seguida, esse foi entrevistado sobre a compreensão dos dispositivos inalatórios, controle da doença e orientações recebidas durante as consultas. RESULTADOS: Foram avaliados 120 voluntários: 60 asmáticos e 60 com DPOC. Todos os asmáticos e 98,3 por cento do grupo DPOC relataram saber utilizar os medicamentos inalatórios. Na amostra como um todo, 113 pacientes (94,2 por cento) cometeram pelo menos um erro ao utilizar o dispositivo inalatório. Os pacientes cometeram mais erros ao utilizar aerossol dosimetrado do que ao utilizar os inaladores de pó seco Aerolizer® (p < 0,001) ou Pulvinal® (p < 0,001), assim como mais erros ao utilizar Aerolizer® do que ao utilizar Pulvinal® (p < 0,05). O grupo DPOC cometeu significativamente mais erros que o grupo asma ao utilizar o aerossol dosimetrado (p = 0,0023), Pulvinal® (p = 0,0065) e Aerolizer® (p = 0,012). CONCLUSÕES: Embora a maioria dos pacientes relatasse saber a técnica adequada de utilização dos dispositivos inalatórios, 94,2 por cento cometeu pelo menos um erro na utilização dos dispositivos, demonstrando técnica insatisfatória e discrepância entre a compreensão e a prática. Portanto, apenas questionar os pacientes sobre o uso dos dispositivos inalatórios não é suficiente. Medidas práticas devem ser tomadas a fim de diminuir os erros e otimizar a terapêutica.


OBJECTIVE: To evaluate knowledge of and techniques for using prescribed inhalation devices among patients with asthma or COPD treated at a tertiary teaching hospital. METHODS: Patients were assessed after medical visits, and their physicians were blinded to this fact. Patients were asked to demonstrate their inhaler technique and were then interviewed regarding their knowledge of inhalation devices, control of the disease and instructions received during medical visits. RESULTS: We included 120 volunteers: 60 with asthma and 60 with COPD. All of the asthma patients and 98.3 percent of the COPD patients claimed to know how to use inhaled medications. In the sample as a whole, 113 patients (94.2 percent) committed at least one error when using the inhalation device. Patients committed more errors when using metered-dose inhalers than when using the dry-powder inhalers Aerolizer® (p < 0.001) or Pulvinal® (p < 0.001), as well as committing more errors when using the Aerolizer® inhaler than when using the Pulvinal® inhaler (p < 0.05). Using the metered-dose, Pulvinal® and Aerolizer® inhalers, the COPD group patients committed more errors than did the asthma group patients (p = 0.0023, p = 0.0065 and p = 0.012, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Although the majority of the patients claimed to know how to use inhalation devices, the fact that 94.2 percent committed at least one error shows that their technique was inappropriate and reveals a discrepancy between understanding and practice. Therefore, it is not sufficient to ask patients whether they know how to use inhalation devices. Practical measures should be taken in order to minimize errors and optimize treatment.


Assuntos
Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Nebulizadores e Vaporizadores/classificação , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Análise e Desempenho de Tarefas , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA