RESUMO
BACKGROUND:Intramedullary nails and locking plates are widely used in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures,but there is no consensus on the choice of internal fixation. OBJECTIVE:To compare the biomechanical stability of intramedullary nails and locking plates in the treatment of two-part and three-part proximal humeral fractures by finite element analysis. METHODS:CT data of the humerus of a volunteer were collected and imported into Minics 21.0,Geomagic Wrap,Soildwork 2017,and Abaqus 2021 to establish finite element models of two-part and three-part fractures treated with two internal fixation methods,respectively.Group A:two-part fracture fixed with intramedullary nail model;group B:two-part fracture fixed with locking plate model;group C:three-part fracture fixed with intramedullary nail model;group D:three-part fracture fixed with locking plate model.The stress distribution,displacement degree,and maximum value of the humerus and internal fixation were compared and analyzed. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:(1)The maximum stress and maximum displacement of the humerus were the smallest in the model of group A,and the maximum stress and maximum displacement of the humerus were the largest in the model of group D.The stress of the locking plate group was mainly concentrated in the medial inferior part of the humeral head and the screw hole area,while the stress of the intramedullary nail group was mainly concentrated around the fracture line and the lateral inferior part of the surgical neck of the humerus.There is no significant difference in displacement distribution between the two.It is mainly concentrated in the distal humerus.(2)The maximum stress value of the intramedullary nail was the lowest in the model of group A,and the maximum stress value of the locking plate was the highest in the model of group D.The maximum stress of the two internal fixations was mainly concentrated in the talar screw and the connection with the internal fixation.The stress cloud distribution of the locking steel plate was concentrated,while the stress cloud distribution of the intramedullary nail was more uniform.(3)The results showed that compared with the locking plate,the intramedullary nail had more biomechanical advantages,and this advantage was more obvious in three-part fractures.
RESUMO
Background- Fractures of distal femur are one of the most prevalent fractures encountered in high-velocity trauma which are associated with high morbidity and mortality if not managed well. The isolated fracture can itself lead to complications such as Acute Respiratory Distress and pulmonary embolism. This neccesitaties early stabilisation of the fractures. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with locking compression plate is the treatment of choice for closed fractures of the distal femur. Distal femur anatomic contoured locking compression plate (LCP) has shown to give one of the best results regarding recovery, fracture union, return to work and the functional outcome. We present our experience of management of distal femur fracture at our centre. Study Material and Methodsdone on 36 patients, (NEER'S Classification) age range of 18 to 70 years (irrespective of their sex), were subjected to fixation by locking compression plate after obtaining thorough written informed consent. The observational study was carried at our institute between June 2021 to June 2022 Patients of both gender who were skeletally mature are taken into the study. In 61.5% of patients up to 50 years old and in Results40% of patients older than 50 years, the functional evaluation of LCP using Neers criteria was excellent. There was no statistically significant (p>0.05) difference in patients' functional status according to their age group who had distal femur fractures, which were stabilise by LCP. For supracondylar femur fractures, locking compression plates is a safe technique that has a good functional outcome, early clinical and radiographic union, and few complications.
RESUMO
Introducción Hacer objetiva la variabilidad interobservador al evaluar una fractura de húmero proximal utilizando la clasificación de Neer y establecer su utilidad diagnóstica y terapéutica. Materiales y Métodos Formulario digital con 20 casos elegidos al azar de fracturas de húmero proximal, de un mismo hospital entre 2010 y 2014. Cada caso incluyó: edad, sexo, lateralidad y dos proyecciones radiográficas. Evaluado de forma anónima por Traumatólogos, con y sin práctica habitual en cirugía del hombro, de hospitales nacionales e internacionales, indicando estadío de Neer y opción terapéutica adecuada. Se estableció la variabilidad interobservador entre grupos y comparando a todos por igual, calculando el índice de Kappa de Fleiss e interpretándolo según los criterios de Landis y Koch. Resultados 40 respuestas de Traumatólogos, 15 con práctica habitual de cirugía de hombro y 25 no. El índice Kappa de Fleiss medio fue 0,173 en el grupo de Traumatólogos con práctica habitual en cirugía de hombro. Siendo 0,176 en el grupo sin práctica habitual. Al evaluarlos conjuntamente, 0,184. Existe gran variabilidad interobservador en la indicación terapéutica y dentro de la indicación quirúrgica. Discusión El grado de acuerdo obtenido, según los criterios de Landis y Koch, ha sido pobre en todos los grupos en lo que a estadío se refiere y débil en lo referente al tratamiento, no influyendo la experiencia del Traumatólogo. Sería necesaria una clasificación más reproducible ya que la clasificación de Neer presenta la suficiente variabilidad interobservador como para aceptarla como único medio en la toma de decisiones.
Background To study inter-observer variability by evaluating a fracture of the proximal humerus using Neer's classification and to establish its diagnostic and therapeutic utility. Methods A computerised form was used with 20 randomly selected cases of fractures of the proximal humerus, from the same hospital between 2010 and 2014. Each case included: age, gender, laterality, and two radiographic projections. They were anonymously evaluated by Traumatologists, for whom shoulder surgery was routine practice or not, from national and international hospitals. They indicated Neer stage and an appropriate therapeutic option. Interobserver variability was established between groups, and comparing all of them equally, calculating Fleap's Kappa index and interpreting it according to the Landis and Koch criteria. Results A total of 40 responses were obtained from the Traumatologists, 15 of them were shoulder surgery was usual practice and 25 where it was not. The mean Fleap Kappa index was 0.173 in the Traumatologists group were shoulder surgery was usual practice, being 0.176 in the group were it was not usual practice. The overall index was 0.184. There is wide interobserver variability in the therapeutic indication, as well as within the surgical indication. Discussion The level of agreement obtained, according to the criteria of Landis and Koch, was poor in all groups in terms of stage, and weak in terms of treatment. The experience of the Traumatologist had no influence. A more reproducible classification may be necessary since Neer's classification has sufficient interobserver variability to accept it as the sole means of decision making.
Assuntos
Humanos , Fraturas do Úmero , Classificação , ÚmeroRESUMO
Objective To assess the interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of Neer classification system and its influencing factors.Methods The present study reviewed the series preoperative radiographs (including those of scapular anteroposterior view,scapular lateral view and modified Velpeau axillary view and an axial CT scan) of 40 patients who had been treated in our department from January 2010 to December 2010 for proximal humeral fractures.The radiographs were assessed by 12 individual observers on 2 separate occasions with an interval of 3 months at least Half of the observers (the professional group; n =6) had received a shoulder fellowship training and the other half (the control group; n =6) had not All the observers were asked to categorize the radiographs according to the Neer classification system of 16 types of fractures in a same process.The reliability and reproducibility of the system were assessed with the Kappa statistics.Comparisons of classification agreement were made between the professional group and the control group.We also evaluated the simplified Neer system of only 6 types of fractures with recombinant data.Results The interobserver reliability coefficients were 0.534 and 0.473 for the first and second assessments,with an intraobserver reproducibility coefficient of 0.669.The agreement level in the professional group was significantly higher than in the control group ( P ＜ 0.05).The interobserver reliability coefficients of the simplified Neer system were 0.581 and 0.502,with an intraobserver reproducibility coefficient of 0.680.Use of the modified Neer system did not elevate the agreement level beyond the moderate range.The classification was agreed on by all the observers in 17.5％ of the fractures during the first assessment and in 15.0％ during the second assessment.Conclusions Neer classification may have fair interobserver reliability and moderate intraobserver reproducibility.Experience of shoulder fellowship training is an important factor influencing the reliability of the Neer system.Simplification of the system may not help increase its reliability.