RESUMO
Background: The acute abdomen is a condi?on that demands urgent a?en?on and treatment, ranging from trivial to life threatening condi?ons. The aim of this study was to know in detail the epidemiology and outcome in nontrauma?c acute abdomen. Methods: An ins?tu?on based, cross-sec?onal study was conducted from December 2019 to April 2020, at Department of General Surgery Govt. Medical College Kota Rajasthan. The study included 100 cases of non-trauma?c abdomen. Results: Non- trauma?c acute abdominal pain was more common in 2ndto 6thdecade of life. The males to female ra?o is 2.85:1. Hollow viscus perfora?on (30%) forms the commonest cause of acute abdomen followed by acute appendici?s, Sub acute intes?nal obstruc?on, renal/ureteric colic, cholelithiasis, pancrea??s, non-specific pain abdomen, OBG related pathology, liver abscess, Meckel’s diver?culi?s and splenic abscess in 24%, 23%, 8%, 4%, 3%, 3%, 2%, 1%, 1% and 1% respec?vely. Sixteen pa?ents managed conserva?vely. Most common surgical procedures done were exploratory laparotomy with needful for hollow viscus perfora?on and open/laparoscopic appendicectomy for acute appendici?s. Conclusions: Proper history taking, clinical examina?on with suppor?ve imaging findings are most important to narrow the differen?al diagnosis and for immediate interven?on to limit morbidity and mortality.
RESUMO
Objective:To apply the best evidence of pre-examination and triage management of patients with non-traumatic acute abdomen to clinical practice and evaluate its effects.Methods:Using convenience sampling method, 15 nurses and 237 patients with non-traumatic acute abdomen admitted in the emergency department of Shanxi Provincial People ′s Hospital from January to May 2021 were selected as the research objects, 114 cases as the baseline review group and 123 cases as the after-effect evaluation group. Following the clinical evidence practice application of JBI Evidence-Based Nursing Center Systematic standard procedures, using self before-after control study to compare the knowledge and behavior of triage nurses before and after evidence application, and compliance with each review index; using a non-contemporaneous controlled trial to compare the changes of pre-examination and triage time and triage accuracy between two groups. Results:After the application of evidence, the score of the triage nurses on the pre-examination and triage of non-traumatic acute abdomen increased from 98.00±6.56 in the after-effect evaluation group to 114.20±3.88 in the base-line review group, and the difference was statistically significant ( t=8.62, P<0.05); after the application of evidence, the compliance with indicators 1-9,12,13,15-17 was significantly improved and the difference was significant ( χ2 values were 11.46-123.06, all P <0.05). After the application of evidence, the compliance rate of those indicators <80% increased to more than 80% except indicator 6, the accuracy of patient triage rose from 84.21%(96/114) to 93.50%(115/123) with a statistically significant difference ( χ2=5.22, P<0.05); after the application of the evidence, the triage time was 2.00(1.00,4.00) min, shorter than 3.00(2.00,4.63) min in the base-line review group, and the difference was statistically significant ( Z=-3.18, P<0.05). Conclusions:The application of the best evidence of pre-examination and triage for non-traumatic acute abdomen can improve the nursing practice of non-traumatic acute abdomen triage, improve the accuracy of non-traumatic acute abdomen triage, and shorten the triage time.
RESUMO
Objective:To investigate the efficacy and safety of low dose S-ketamine in analgesia of elderly patients with non-traumatic acute abdomen (NTAA) in emergency department.Methods:This was a randomized controlled trail. From January to August 2021, elderly patients with NTAA in the Emergency Department of the No. 904 Hospital of the Joint Logistic Support Force were selected. Analgesia was administered intravenously with 0.3 mg/kg S-ketamine or 0.1 mg/kg morphine injection for 15 min. Visual analogue score (VAS), respiratory rate, heart rate, non-invasive blood pressure and pulse oxygen saturation were recorded at 15 min, 30 min, 60 min and 90 min. The mini-mental state examination (MMSE) scores were recorded at 90 min after injection. The incidence of salvage analgesia, incidence of adverse reactions and diagnostic accuracy after analgesia were recorded in the two groups. VAS scores and vital signs were compared between the two groups by two-way repeated measures analysis of variance, and multiple comparisons between and within groups were performed.Results:A total of 137 elderly patients with NTAA were selected and randomly divided into two groups: S-ketamine group (SK group, 68 cases) and morphine group (M group, 69 cases). After the exclusion of patients with abscission, 39 cases were included in the SK group and 45 cases in the M group. VAS score of the SK group was significantly lower than that of the M group in 15 min after administration [(3.1±1.8) vs. (4.8±2.2)], and the difference was statistically significant ( P=0.013). There were no significant differences in vital signs and MMSE score between the two groups or within the group at each time point after medication (all P>0.05). However, the incidence of dizziness in the SK group was significantly higher than that in the M group (61.54% vs. 31.11%, P=0.005). Conclusions:Intravenous administration of low dose S-ketamine is not considered to be more effective than morphine in alleviating acute abdominal pain in elderly patients with NTAA. S-ketamine provides not only satisfactory analgesia but also short recovery time and high controllability. S-ketamine is one of the recommended analgesic alternatives of NTAA for elderly patients in emergency.