Comparison between GLIM and PG-SGA methods in the nutritional assessment of hospitalized oncological patients / Comparação entre os métodos GLIM e ASG-PPP na avaliação nutricional de pacientes oncológicos hospitalizados

ABSTRACT Objective The aim of this study was to compare the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition and Subjective Global Assessment methods produced by the patient in the nutritional assessment of cancer in-patients. Methods Cross-sectional study with a prospective variable, conducted with patients admitted to a public hospital in Pernambuco, Brazil. The application of these tools and the diagnosis of malnutrition were performed within the first 48 hours of admission. Sociodemographic, clinical and laboratory data were obtained from the medical records and weight, height, arm circumference, triceps skinfold and handgrip strength data were collected. Results The 82 patients evaluated included mostly men aged ≥ 60 years with less than 8 years education. Malnutrition frequency was 93.7% according to the Subjective Global Assessment and including 23.2% severe malnutrition while, according to the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition, 50% of the patients were considered severely malnourished. Malnutrition by the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition showed a sensitivity of 82.9% and when associated with handgrip strength sensitivity was 90.8%, considering the Subjective global assessment produced by the patient as a reference; on the other hand, the specificity was 16.7% independently of adding handgrip strength. None of the anthropometric variables was associated with the reference tool. Conclusion The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition proved to be a very sensitive tool for diagnosing malnutrition when compared to the gold standard, particularly for severe malnutrition, but with little specificity. The need for a comprehensive nutritional assessment in the clinical practice was confirmed, using the parameters available and not interpreting them separately.

RESUMO Objetivo O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar os métodos Global Leadership Initiativeon Malnutrition e Avaliação Subjetiva Global Produzida pelo Próprio Paciente na avaliação nutricional de pacientes oncológicos hospitalizados. Métodos Estudo transversal com uma variável prospectiva, realizado com pacientes internados em um hospital público de Pernambuco. A aplicação dessas ferramentas e o diagnóstico de desnutrição foram realizados nas primeiras 48 horas de admissão. Dados sociodemográficos, clínicos e laboratoriais foram obtidos do prontuário, e dados com peso, altura, circunferência do braço, prega cutânea tricipital e força de preensão palmar foram coletados. Resultados Dos 82 pacientes avaliados, a maioria eram homens com idade ≥60 anos com menos de 8 anos de estudo. A frequência de desnutrição foi de 93,7% pela Avaliação Subjetiva Global; destes, 23,2% com desnutrição grave. Já pela Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition, 50% dos pacientes foram considerados desnutridos graves. A desnutrição pela Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition apresentou uma sensibilidade de 82,9% e de 90,8% quando associada à força de preensão palmar considerando a Avaliação Subjetiva Global Produzida pelo Próprio Paciente como referência. Por sua vez, a especificidade foi de 16,7% independentemente de adicionar a força de preensão palmar. Nenhuma das variáveis antropométricas apresentou associação com a ferramenta de referência. Conclusão A Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition mostrou-se uma ferramenta bastante sensível para diagnosticar desnutrição quando comparada ao padrão ouro, principalmente para desnutrição grave, porém pouco específica. Ratificou-se a necessidade de uma avaliação nutricional ampla na prática clínica, utilizando os parâmetros disponíveis e não os interpretando de forma isolada.

Tracking of risk factors for non-communicable diseases in young shooters, Ituiutaba, MG

The aim of this study was to detect early hypertension, diabetes and obesity, as well as their risk factors, in 105 young shooters from Tiro de Guerra 11-002 in the city of Ituiutaba-MG. This is a cross-sectional mixed study. A semi-structured questionnaire that contained questions related to the sociodemographic context, health status, lifestyle, eating habits, and psychosocial variables was applied. Blood pressure, anthropometric indexes, and lipid and glycemic profiles were measured. Descriptive and inferential statistics, including Pearson's correlation test and Spearman's coefficient, considering significative value (p < 0.05). The shooters had an average of 18.9 years old, most educated and brown. Anthropometric indices indicated a mainly eutrophic population, and normotensive and desirable lipid and glycemic profiles. However, overweight, high blood pressure, and self-declaration of family history for chronic diseases were identified. In addition, most shooters affirmed to ingest alcoholics beverages, to have insufficient time of physical activity, and to be aware of their levels of stress, pressure and anxiety and a few hours of sleep. Overall, the shooters showed good anthropometric and biochemical indicatorsof blood. Risk behavior, such as drinking alcoholic beverages and smoking, low level of physical activity and self-perception of stress, anxiety and pressure were also noted.