RESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate the differential clinical & electroencephalographic characteristics between benign childhood epilepsy with occipital paroxysm (BCEOP) and symptomatic occipital lobe epilepsy (SOLE). METHODS: Nine patients of BCEOP and seven patients of SOLE diagnosed at the department of pediatrics and epilepsy center in Inje University Sang-gye Paik Hospital from March 1992 to June 1998, were studied for the determination of differential characteristics between the two groups. Clinical features, EEG characteristics, MRI findings, associated conditions, and prognosis were investigated and compared between these groups. RESULT: 1) Male : female ratio was 1 : 2 in BCEOP and 1 : 2.5 in SOLE. 2) Seizure onset age was older in SOLE as compared with BCEOP. 3) There was no significant difference in seizure types between two groups. 4) Visual aura could be elicited in 5 patients (55.6%) in BCEOP, and 3 patients (42.9%) in SOLE. 5) Ictus emeticus was only noted in 4 patients (44.4%) of BCEOP. 6) Migraine was associated only in 3 patients of BCEOP. 7) Background EEG abnormality was more frequently associated in SOLE than BCEOP. 8) Seizure control was inefficient only in 3 patients (42.9%) of SOLE, and all patients with BCEOP were successfully treated with antiepileptic drugs. CONCLUSION: SOLE showed higher seizure onset age, less frequent association of ictus emeticus and migraine, more frequent background EEG abnormalities and more medical intractability to antiepileptic drugs than BCEOP.
Assuntos
Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Idade de Início , Anticonvulsivantes , Eletroencefalografia , Epilepsias Parciais , Epilepsia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Transtornos de Enxaqueca , Lobo Occipital , Pediatria , Prognóstico , ConvulsõesRESUMO
PURPOSE: The objective of this study is to review the clinical manifestations and acknowledge the prognostic factors in occipital lobe seizure and benign childhood epilepsy with occipital paroxysm (BEOP). METHODS: We reviewed retrospectively 253 cases who showed occipital epileptiform activity on EEG at the Pediatric Neurology Clinic, Yonsei University Medical Center from January 1997 to June 1999, and selected 72 cases who had been followed-up for over 2 years. According to the occurrence of seizure for recent 2 years, they were classified into 2 groups : favorable and unfavorable groups. Clinical manifestations were reviewed and analyzed in each group with chi-square and student t-test. RESULTS: 1) Symptomatic group was 16 out of 72 cases (22%), and cryptogenic group was 56 cases (78%). Seventeen out of 72 cases (24%) had the clinical manifestation of BEOP. 2) Early-onset variant is 9 out of 17 cases (52%), late-onset was 8 cases (48%) in BEOP patients. 3) Prognostic factors influencing unfavorable prognosis were prematurity, LBW, perinatal asphyxia and postictal headache in occipital lobe seizure. 4) Prognostic factors in BEOP were determined by age of onset, existence of visual symptom, oculomotor symptom, automatism, autonomic symptom, postictal headache, and diurnal or nocturnal seizure. CONCLUSION: Occipital lobe seizure manifests various clinical symptoms with various prognosis. Seventeen out of 72 cases were determined as BEOP: 9 cases of early variant and 8 cases of late onset. We acknowledge the prognostic factors in epilepsy with occipital lobe seizure as well as BEOP.