RESUMO
@#<b>Objective</b> To study the setup error under deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) guided by optical surface monitoring system (OSMS) and free breathing (FB) FB1 and FB2 (without OSMS guidance, directly set up the body marker line by laser lamp) in radiotherapy after radical mastectomy for left breast cancer, and to provide a basis for individualized clinical target volume-planning target volume (CTV-PTV) expansion for the doctor in charge to delineate the target volume. <b>Methods</b> A total of 36 patients with left breast cancer after radical mastectomy were selected and divided into three groups, in which cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were taken in three states: DIBH, FB1, and FB2, respectively. CBCT and CT images were analyzed for registration; the absolute error data of linear displacement in the ventro-dorsal, cranio-caudal, and left-right directions were recorded, and the expanding margin was calculated. <b>Results</b> The translation errors in the ventro-dorsal, cranio-caudal, and left-right directions were (0.06 ± 0.22) cm, (0.05 ± 0.23) cm, and (0.01 ± 0.24) cm in the DIBH group, (0.07 ± 0.21) cm, (0.02 ± 0.23) cm, and (0.02 ± 0.21) cm in the FB1 group, and (0.07 ± 0.24) cm, (0.07 ± 0.34) cm, and (0.25 ± 0.09) cm in the FB2 group. The statistical results of the DIBH group and FB1 group in the ventro-dorsal, RTN, and ROLL directions were significantly different (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The statistical results of the FB1 group and FB2 group in the ventro-dorsal direction were significantly different. The relation of three groups in the value of margin of planning target volume was DIBH < FB1 < FB2 in the ventro-dorsal and cranio-caudal directions and FB1 < DIBH < FB2 in the left-right direction. <b>Conclusion</b> OSMS-guided DIBH radiotherapy in patients with left breast cancer after radical mastectomy can reduce the setup error and provide an important basis for individualized CTV-PTV expansion for the doctor in charge to delineate the target volume.
RESUMO
Objective:To establish a novel clinical application process of the optical surface monitoring system (OSMS) in the cranial frameless stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), and to assess the accuracy and effectiveness of the OSMS in the intra-fraction motion monitoring of both cranial phantoms and cranial SRT patients fixed using the Q-Fix encompass immobilization system.Methods:The deviations of OSMS in the real-time motion monitoring were assessed by determining the deviations between the displacement of the cranial SRS phantoms detected by the OSMS and the predefined displacement of the Varian Edge six degrees of freedom (6DoF) couch. The ability of the OSMS to conduct real-time monitoring of the head movement was also analyzed when one camera was blocked by the rotary gantry of the accelerator and when the couch was at non-zero angles. Moreover, ten patients who received 50 fractions of cranial frameless SRT were enrolled in this study. All the patients were fixed using the Q-Fix Encompass system, and their intra-fraction motion was monitored using the OSMS. The intra-fraction errors of OSMS real-time monitoring throughout the treatment were obtained from the OSMS logs. The patients received cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) after the beam delivery, and the six-dimensional errors were obtained as intra-fraction motion errors of the CBCT.Results:For the cranial phantoms, there was a close correlation between the OSMS monitoring deviations and the predefined displacement in six dimensions. The OSMS-detected 3D vector deviations in the translational and rotational directions were (0.28±0.10) mm and (0.15±0.09)°, respectively when the angel both the gantry and couch was 0° and were (0.35±0.13) mm and(0.17±0.09)°, respectively, when one camera was blocked. The OSMS monitoring deviations with the couch at a non-zero degree were greater than those at zero degree. The maximum deviations occurred when the couch was at 270° and were (0.69±0.19) mm and (0.32±0.12)°, respectively, in the translational and rotational directions. For the cranial SRT patients fixed using the Q-Fix Encompass system, the OSMS and CBCT showed comparable intra-fractional motion deviations, which were (0.40±0.26) and (0.29±0.10) mm, respectively in the translational direction and were (0.33±0.20)°and (0.26±0.08)° in the rotational direction.Conclusions:The OSMS is an effective tool for optically guided radiotherapy, which allows for intra-fraction real-time motion monitoring with sub-millimeter accuracy. Therefore, to ensure the accurate preformation of cranial SRS/SRT, it is necessary to conduct the intra-fractional position monitoring using OSMS.
RESUMO
Objective:To retrospectively analyze the setup errors of thermoplastic head and shoulder molds alone or combined with vacuum pad in hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HFSRT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with brain metastases.Methods:Fifty-four NSCLC patients with brain metastases who received HFSRT from 2017 to 2019 were enrolled in this study. Twenty-four patients were fixed with thermoplastic head and shoulder molds (group A), and 30 patients were fixed with thermoplastic head and shoulder molds plus vacuum pad (group B). The interfraction and intrafraction setup errors were acquired from cone-beam CT online image registration before and after the HFSRT. Optical surface system was applied in monitoring the intrafraction setup errors. The setup errors in each direction between two groups were analyzed by independent samples t-test. Results:For the interfraction setup errors of the whole group, the proportion of the horizontal setup errors of ≥3mm was 7.0% to 15.4% and 7.0% to 12.6% for the rotation setup errors of ≥2°. In group A, the anteroposterior setup error was (1.035±1.180)mm, significantly less than (1.512±0.955)mm in group B ( P=0.009). In group A, the sagittal rotation setup error was 0.665°±0.582°, significantly less than 0.921°±0.682° in group B ( P=0.021). For the intrafraction setup errors of the whole group, the proportion of horizontal setup errors of ≥1mm was 0% to 0.7%, whereas no rotation setup error of ≥1° were observed. In group B, bilateral, anteroposterior and sagittal rotation setup errors were (0.047±0.212)mm, (0.023±0.152)mm and 0.091°±0.090°, significantly less compared with (0.246±0.474)mm, (0.140±0.350)mm and 0.181°±0.210° in group A ( P=0.004, P=0.020, P=0.001), respectively. Optical surface monitoring data were consistent with the obtained results. Conclusions:Thermoplastic head and shoulder molds (with or without vacuum pad) combined with online image registration and six-dimensional robotic couch correction can be applied in HFSRT for brain metastases from NSCLC. The intrafraction setup errors in group B are smaller than those in group A. Optical surface system has certain value in monitoring the intrafractional movement.