Potencialidades e limitações do Prontuário Eletrônico do Cidadão (PEC) enquanto ferramenta de gestão de cuidado e planejamento: avaliação a nível nacional e local / Potentials and limitations of the Electronic Citizen Record (PEC) as a care management and planning tool: assessment at national and local level

O objetivo desse estudo foi analisar as potencialidade e limitações do Prontuário Eletrônico do Cidadão (PEC) e comparar com os indicadores assistenciais de saúde bucal da Atenção Básica a nível nacional e de um município no interior do estado da Paraíba. A coleta de dados foi dividida em dois momentos: primeiro foram coletadas informações dos relatórios do e-SUS PEC presentes no site eletrônico e-Gestor do Departamento da Atenção Básica do Ministério da Saúde, referentes às equipes de saúde bucal das USF e em seguida a aplicação de um questionário estruturado para avaliar a aceitação, a facilidade e o uso do Prontuário Eletrônico do Cidadão (PEC) pelos cirurgiões dentistas cadastrados no município. Nos resultados, as regiões do Norte e Nordeste apresentaram os menores coeficientes de resolutividade (46,6 e 50,6) e com maior cobertura de primeira consulta odontológica (9,5 e 9,3), entretanto com maiores valores para exodontias (14,2 e 13,1); quanto à proporção de procedimentos preventivos observados, nota-se que o grau de priorização de cuidados de prevenção é alto em todas as regiões. Em nível local foram observadas variações significativas entre as USF; quanto ao uso do PEC 73,1% concordam que encontram mais rápido o prontuário no formato eletrônico e 61,5% concordam que o PEC otimiza seu processo de trabalho, já em relação ao manuseio do sistema 76,9% concordaram ser fácil. Portanto, existe uma disparidade de primeira consulta odontológica com a conclusão dos tratamentos e apesar de ser alta a cobertura de primeiro atendimento, mesmo assim, não é suficiente para evitar agravos dos problemas de saúde bucal, bem como o PEC é uma importante ferramenta que proporciona melhor assistência ao paciente, auxilia no atendimento, ajuda no planejamento de cuidados em saúde, facilita o acesso de dados (AU).

The objective of this study was to analyze and compare the potentialities and limitations of the Citizen's Electronic Record (PEC) with the oral health care indicators of Primary Care at national level and of a municipality in the interior of the state of Paraíba. Data collection will take place in two stages: first, information will be collected from the e-SUS PEC reports present on the e-Gestor website of the Department of Primary Care of the Ministry of Health, referring to the USF oral health teams, and then to application of a specific and objective questionnaire to assess acceptance, ease and use of the Citizen's Electronic Record (PEC) by dentists registered in the municipality. The results show that the Northeast and North have the lowest resolubility coefficients (46.6 and 50.6) and the highest coverage of the first dental appointment (9.5 and 9.3), however with higher values for extractions (14.2 and 13.1); as for the proportion of preventive procedures observed, it is noted that the degree of prioritization of preventive care is high in all regions and at the local level, significant variations were observed between USF; regarding the use of the PEC, 76.9% did not receive qualification or training, 23.1% always experience difficulties when handling it and 46.2% are sometimes able to operate all the functions of the system. Therefore, there is a disparity between the first dental visit and the completion of treatments and, despite the high coverage of the first visit, even so, it is not enough to avoid worsening oral health problems, as well as the PEC is an important tool that provides better patient care, assist with care, help with health care planning, facilitate data access (AU).

The Utilization of Oral Health Services in Community Health Centers in Korea: A Study Using Data from the 2011-2012 Community Health Survey / 대한구강보건학회지

OBJECTIVES: To determine the utilization of oral health services in community health centers in Korea. METHODS: This cross-sectional study involved secondary analysis of data obtained from the 2011-2012 Community Health Survey. The data were analyzed to determine the utilization of community oral health services. A total of 458,417 people (weighted sample was 80,268,227) were included. A multistage probability proportional systematic sampling method was used. The dependent variable was the utilization of community oral health services. The independent variables were region (city, town, and district), demographic characteristics (gender, age, education, income, occupation, and basic livelihood security), oral health status, and overall health status. The differences in the utilization of community oral health services related to independent variables were analyzed using an independent t-test and ANOVA. Additionally, a Scheffe post-hoc test was performed. Statistical analysis was performed using PASW statistics 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), at the 5% significance level. RESULTS: The average utilization rate was 26.3% for community health care services and 4.3% for oral health services during the study period in Korea. Utilization was associated with old age and lower education and income levels (P<0.01). Furthermore, residents having poor oral health, chewing discomfort, and unmet dental needs most frequently used the community oral health services. CONCLUSIONS: The utilization of community oral health services was low in Korea. The needs and circumstances of communities should be considered and unique regional structural characteristics should be identified to plan and execute oral health programs and incorporate them with community health care services for overall community health.