Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Korean Journal of Medicine ; : 526-532, 2017.
Artigo em Coreano | WPRIM | ID: wpr-103599

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Platelet counts and characteristics can influence platelet reactivity during antiplatelet therapy. We compared the effects of both platelet count and indices on platelet reactivity between patients who were treated with either clopodogrel or ticagrelor. METHODS: Patients with coronary artery disease who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention were randomly assigned to either the clopidogrel (n = 63) or ticagrelor (n = 65) groups. Platelet count, platelet indices (including mean platelet volume, platelet distribution width, platelet large cell ratio, and immature platelet fraction), and platelet reactivity were measured before intervention, and 48 hours and 30 days post-intervention. High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) was defined as ≥ 47 unit as assessed by multiple electrode platelet aggregometry. RESULTS: Baseline platelet reactivity was similar between the two groups; however, at 48 hours and 30 days, platelet reactivity was significantly lower in the ticagrelor group than in the clopidogrel group. Platelet count, mean platelet volume, platelet distribution width, platelet large cell ratio, and immature platelet fraction were significantly correlated with platelet reactivity in the clopidogrel group; however, these correlations were attenuated in the ticagrelor group. The use of clopodogrel (hazard ratio [HR] 4.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4–11.9; p = 0.010) and platelet count (HR 9.7, 95% CI 2.9–32.7; p = 0.001) were independent predictors for 30 day HPR. Platelet count was an independent predictor of HPR in the clopidogrel group but not in the ticagrelor group. CONCLUSIONS: Platelet count and indices are significantly correlated with platelet reactivity. However, antiplatelet treatment with ticagrelor could overcome these associations.


Assuntos
Humanos , Plaquetas , Doença da Artéria Coronariana , Eletrodos , Volume Plaquetário Médio , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Contagem de Plaquetas , Testes de Função Plaquetária , Antagonistas do Receptor Purinérgico P2Y
2.
Tianjin Medical Journal ; (12): 663-667, 2017.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-612357

RESUMO

The P2Y12 receptor antagonist is used widely in prevention and treatment of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. Monitoring changes of platelet function after treatment can improve the prognosis of patients. The platelet function test is the important way to evaluate high residual platelet reactivity after antiplatelet treatment, including light transmission aggregometry (LTA), whole blood impedance aggregometry assay (WBIA), vasodilator- stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP), thrombelastogram (TEG), platelet function analyzer- 100 (PFA-100) and VerifyNow system (VerifyNow). It is very different for the reflecting ability with residual reactivity of platelets among these tests after anti-platelet therapy, and also significant difference for assessment effect. Among them, LTA is a classic method for the curative effect evaluation of anti-platelet agents, which is convenient and cheap, but it is susceptible to the operating and environment interference. The clinical application of WBIA is less, and which lacks threshold value for assessment. VASP is sensitive for the changes of platelet function, but the test is complex and expensive. TEG can monitor the inhibition ratio of drugs on anti-platelets, but it needs to verify the safety of treatment. It is not clear for sensitivity and specificity with monitoring anti-platelet agent by PFA-100. VerifyNow is effective and reliable, but the cost is high. The evidence of clinical study shows that LTA, VASP and VerifyNow can reflect the effect of platelet inhibition of P2Y12 receptor antagonists sensitively, and is associated with the risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in patients with cadiovascular diseases.

3.
Chinese Pharmacological Bulletin ; (12): 1041-1045, 2017.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-613674

RESUMO

P2Y12 receptor antagonists and morphine are often recommended in patients with acute myocardial infarction.P2Y12 receptor antagonists can rapidly and potently reduce the platelet activity and prevent future thrombotic events.Meanwhile,combined morphine is used to relieve symptoms of angina.A number of studies have confirmed that morphine can decrease plasma concentrations of clopidogrel and impair its anti-platelet activity,which may lead to poor response in clopidogrel-treated patients with acute coronary syndrome.The randomized trials in healthy volunteers and patients with acute myocardial infarction also confirmed the similar drug-drug interaction between morphine and ticagrelor or prasugrel.Although the P2Y12 receptor antagonists combined with morphine are still used for myocardial infarction patients,there are few report on the objective evaluation of this drug interaction.This review,based on the findings of experimental as well as observational and randomized clinical studies,summarizes completely the drug interactions between oral P2Y12 receptor antagonists and morphine.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA