RESUMO
@#During chemotherapy of malignant tumors,neutropenia is the most important adverse event caused by myelosuppressive chemotherapeutics,of which the degree and duration are closely related to the risk of infection and even death.Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor(G-CSF) is an endogenous hematopoietic growth factor that can stimulate the proliferation and differentiation of neutrophil precursors,and increase the survival rate and activity of mature neutrophils.Recombinant human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor(rhG-CSF) is an artificially synthesized cytokine with G-CSF biological activity.It is used clinically for the prevention and treatment of neutropenia after treatment with cytotoxic chemotherapeutics,requiring multiple medications and repeated injections during application for its short half-life.Pegylated recombinant human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor(PEG-rhG-CSF) is its long-acting dosage form,and patients only need to be administered once per cycle of chemotherapy,which has been widely used in clinical practice because of its stability and convenience.This paper systematically described the clinical application value of PEG-rhG-CSF in neutropenia after chemotherapy,aiming to provide a reference for its further clinical application.
RESUMO
Objective:To evaluate the effect of preventive application of PEG-rhG-CSF on the prevention of neutropenia during concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with lung cancer.Methods:A total of 149 patients with lung cancer who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy at Peking University Cancer Hospital from April 2020 to April 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 79 cases in the prevention group, including 48 cases of primary prevention group (preventive application of PEG-rhG-CSF in all concurrent chemoradiotherapy cycles) and 31 cases of secondary prevention group (preventive application of PEG-rhG-CSF in the concurrent chemoradiotherapy cycles after neutropenia occurred). There were 70 cases in non-prevention group. The incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia, the completion rate of concurrent chemoradiotherapy, the rate of chemoradiotherapy dose reduction and treatment delay, and the rate of hematological toxicities related hospitalization were compared between the prevention group and the non-prevention group.Results:The incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia in the whole group was 32.2% (48/149), including 6.3% (3/48) in the primary prevention group, 9.7% (3/31) in the secondary prevention group, and 35.7% (25/70) in the non-prevention group. The difference was statistically significant ( χ2=17.81, P<0.001) in the incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia. The incidence of febrile neutropenia was 3.4% (5/149) in the whole group, but none of them occurred in the primary prevention group. The full completion rate of concurrent chemotherapy was 96.2% (76/79) in the prevention group, which was significantly higher than 82.9% (58/70) in the non-prevention group ( χ2=7.30, P=0.007). The incidence of treatment delayed and dose reduction of chemoradiotherapy was 19.0% (15/79) in the prevention group and 40.0% (28/70) in the non-prevention group, and the difference was statistically significant ( χ2=7.98, P=0.005). Conclusions:The preventive application of PEG-rhG-CSF can effectively reduce the incidence of neutropenia and better ensure the concurrent chemoradiotherapy in lung cancer patients on schedule.
RESUMO
Objective To explore the efficacy and safety of polyethylene glycol recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) in preventing chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in locally advanced non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients at nutritional risk. Methods A total of 337 locally advanced NSCLC patients at nutritional risk were selected. They were randomly divided into three groups: 112 cases in the non-prophylactic drug group (control group), 112 cases in the prophylactic use of rhG-CSF treatment group (rhG-CSF group), and 113 cases in the prophylactic use of PEG-rhG-CSF treatment group (PEG-rhG-CSF group). The incidence and duration of neutropenia after chemotherapy and the ratio of CD4+/CD8+T cells in peripheral blood were observed. Results The incidences of neutropenia in the control group, rhG-CSF group, and PEG-rhG-CSF group were 67.97%, 41.57%, and 38.98% (P < 0.05), respectively. The incidences of grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ neutropenia in the three groups were 22.39%, 14.25%, and 11.14% (P < 0.05); moreover, the incidence of febrile neutropenia in the three groups was 3.55%, 1.84%, and 1.21% (P < 0.05); in addition, the ratios of CD4+/CD8+T cells in peripheral blood were 1.27±0.44, 1.41±0.52, and 1.49±0.42 (P < 0.05). The duration of grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ neutropenia and the time required for the neutrophil value to reach 2.0×109/L from the lowest value in the PEG-rhG-CSF group were lower than those in the control and rhG-CSF groups (P < 0.05). Conclusion The PEG-rhG-CSF preventive treatment used in the course of chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced NSCLC patients at nutritional risk can reduce the incidence of neutropenia and improve immunologic function. PEG-rhG-CSF preventive treatment is worthy of clinical recommendation.
RESUMO
Objective: To analyze the clinical effect of prophylactic use of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) after chemotherapy in patients with soft tissue sarcoma. Methods: The clinical data of the patients with soft tissue sarcoma who were diagnosed in the Oncology Department of Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan Universtiy from July 2016 to July 2019, and received the preventive treatment of PEG-rhG-CSF after chemotherapy to prevent the increase of leukocyte count in vivo, was collected and analyzed. Results: A total of 107 patients with soft tissue sarcoma were treated with PEG-rhG-CSF after chemotherapy. The incidence of neutropenia was 48.6% (52/107), in which the incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia was 28.0% (30/107), and the incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) was 4.7% (5/107). The incidence of neutropenia in male or female patients was 52.8% (28/53) or 44.4% (24/54), respectively; there was no significant difference (P > 0.05). The incidence of neutropenia in elderly patients (≥ 65 years old) or young and mid-aged patients ( 0.05). The use of IA chemotherapy with ifosfamide and doxorubicin was more toxic, the incidence of neutropenia was 50.9% (27/53) with 4 cases of FN. In the patients who received major surgery (grade 3-4) or those who did not receive major surgery (grade 1-2 and no surgery), the incidence of neutropenia was 60.0% (36/60) or 34.0% (16/47), respectively; there was significant difference (P < 0.05). In the patients who received radiotherapy or those without radiotherapy, the incidence of neutropenia was 70.0% (14/20) or 43.7% (38/87), respectively; there was significant difference (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The prophylactic use of PEG-rhG-CSF can avoid severe myelotoxicity in the majority of patients with soft tissue sarcoma. However, the risk of neutropenia is still high in the patients who received chemotherapy based on ifosfamide and anthracyclines, as well as in the patients who have received radiotherapy and major surgery in the past. All these are worthy of concern.
RESUMO
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of PEG-rhG-CSF therapy in the primary and secondary prevention of chemo-therapy-induced neutropenia . Methods: This single-center, one-arm, and open-label clinical study involved 217 patients with non-my-eloid malignant tumors. These patients included 18 gynecologic oncology (3 endometrial and 15 ovarian cancer), 50 breast cancer, 30 bone tumor, and 119 lymphoma patients who underwent a total of 774 cycles of chemotherapy, comprising 146 primary and 71 sec-ondary prevention patients. The patients ≥45 kg and those <45 kg received a single subcutaneous injection of 6 mg and 3 mg PEG-rhG-CSF, respectively, 24-48 h after the chemotherapy was completed. All patients received only one dose of PEG-rhG-CSF admin-istration per chemotherapy cycle. Results: The overall incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) was found to be 5.7%, with rates of 4.9% and 7.2% in the primary and secondary prevention groups, respectively. Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analyses re-vealed that the longer PEG-rhG-CSF was sustained in the treatment cycle, the lower the incidence of FN was. The incidence of FN was significantly lower in the second cycle of the treatment than in the first in both the primary and secondary prevention groups (cycle 1 vs. cycle 2: 11.6% vs. 4.4%, respectively, P=0.039, in the primary group; 16.9% vs. 5.6%, respectively, P=0.034, in the secondary group). The overall incidence of gradeⅣneutropenia was 10.3% (80/774), with rates of 6.7% (34/510) and 17.4% (46/264) in the primary and secondary prevention groups, respectively (P<0.001). The incidence of gradeⅣneutropenia was significantly lower in the second cy-cle of the treatment than in the first (cycle 1 vs. cycle 2: 17.1% vs. 5.3%, respectively, P=0.004, in the primary group; 46.5% vs. 11.3%, respectively, P<0.001, in the secondary group). The treatment-induced toxicity mainly involved bone pain, with 3.7% (8/217) and 1.8% (4/217) incidence rates for grade 1-2 and 3-4 bone pain, respectively. Conclusions: PEG-rhG-CSF administration can effectively reduce the incidence of FN (5.7%) when prophylactically applied to patients with non-myeloid malignant tumors. Primary prevention can sig- nificantly reduce the risk of grade IV neutropenia in all chemotherapy cycles relative to the secondary prevention.