Intervención Psicofisiológica basada en la Teoría Polivagal para Manejo del Dolor Lumbar Crónico / Psychophysiological Intervention based on the Polyvagal Theory for the Management of Chronic Low Back Pain

Resumen El dolor lumbar crónico es un padecimiento común asociado a problemas físicos y afectivos. Recientemente, Dana (2019) sugirió un conjunto de estrategias psicológicas breves, basadas en los principios de la Teoría Polivagal, para el manejo del estrés, sin embargo, su uso no se ha aplicado en el campo del dolor. El presente estudio evaluó la eficacia de un plan de tratamiento en regulación autonómica del complejo vagal ventral para la disminución de la intensidad e interferencia del dolor, así como el efecto sobre la ansiedad, la depresión y catastrofización. Mediante un estudio pre experimental, con un muestreo no probabilístico, se utilizó un diseño de medidas repetidas para evaluar los efectos de un programa breve en pacientes con lumbalgia, sobre medidas psicométricas de dolor, ansiedad, depresión y catastrofización, así como la regulación fisiológica autonómica de la Frecuencia Cardiaca y la Temperatura Periférica. Los resultados revelaron una disminución significativa (p < .05) de la interferencia del dolor del estado anímico, el trabajo, la ansiedad, depresión y la catastrofización; así como un incremento en la temperatura periférica. Esto sugiere que el tratamiento fue eficaz para el manejo de problemas afectivos de estos pacientes, y consistente con los niveles de activación fisiológica propuestos por la Teoría Polivagal.

Abstract Chronic low back pain is a common chronic pain condition, associated with physical and emotional problems. Recently, Dana (2019) suggested a set of brief psychological strategies, based on the principles of the Polyvagal Theory, for stress management in people with chronic affective problems; however, no use has not been applied in the field of pain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a treatment plan based on the autonomic regulation of the ventral vagal complex for the reduction of pain intensity, mood, behavioral and social interference, as well as the effect on anxiety, depression, and catastrophizing associated with pain. Through a pre-experimental study, with a non-probabilistic demonstration, a repeated measures design was obtained to evaluate the effects of a brief program in patients with low back pain, on validated psychometric measures of pain, anxiety, depression, and catastrophizing, as well as autonomic physiological regulation. Heart rate and peripheral temperature. Results revealed a significant (p < .05) decrease in pain interference from mood, work, anxiety, depression, and catastrophizing, as well as an increase in peripheral temperature. This suggests that the treatment was effective in managing the affective problems of these patients, and consistent with the levels of physiological activation proposed by the Polyvagal Theory on the affective state.

Associations between postoperative analgesic consumption and distress tolerance, anxiety, depression, and pain catastrophizing: a prospective observational study

Abstract Background Patients' postoperative treatment might be affected by their psychological state. The study aimed to evaluate the effects of anxiety, coping ability (stress tolerance), depression, and pain catastrophizing on analgesic consumption in patients scheduled for sleeve gastrectomy. Methods This prospective observational study consisted of 72 patients. The Distress Tolerance Scale (DTS), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) were completed in the preoperative period. In the postoperative period, pain intensity, as measured with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and morphine consumption (mg) were evaluated after 2, 6, 8, and 24 hours. Total morphine consumption was recorded. Results The results revealed a strong negative correlation between distress tolerance and postoperative total morphine consumption (r = -0.702, p< 0.001). There was a strong positive correlation between total morphine consumption and pain catastrophizing (r = 0.801, p< 0.001). A moderate positive correlation was observed between total morphine consumption and anxiety and between total morphine consumption and depression (r = 0.511, p< 0.001; r = 0.556, p< 0.001, respectively). Linear regression revealed that distress tolerance, anxiety, depression, and pain catastrophizing are predictors of postoperative morphine consumption (β = 0.597, p< 0.001; β = 0.207, p= 0.036; β = 0.140, p= 0.208; β = 0.624, p< 0.001, respectively). Conclusions Distress tolerance, anxiety, depression, and pain catastrophizing can be predictive of postoperative analgesic consumption. In the estimation of postoperative analgesic consumption, distress tolerance, as well as anxiety, depression, and pain catastrophizing, were found to be important predictors.

Validation of the Brazilian version of the child pain catastrophizing scale and its relationship with a marker of central sensitization

Abstract Objectives The Pain Catastrophizing Scale-Child version (PCS-C) allows to identify children who are prone to catastrophic thinking. We aimed to adapt the Brazilian version of PCS-C (BPCS-C) to examine scale psychometric properties and factorial structure in children with and without chronic pain. Also, we assessed its correlation with salivary levels of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic factor (BDNF). Methods The Brazilian version of PCS-C was modified to adjust it for 7-12 years old children. To assess psychometric properties, 100 children (44 with chronic pain from a tertiary hospital and 56 healthy children from a public school) answered the BPCS-C, the visual analogue pain scale, and questions about pain interference in daily activities. We also collected a salivary sample to measure BDNF. Results We observed good internal consistency (Cronbach's value = 0.81). Parallel analysis retained 2 factors. Confirmatory factor analysis of our 2-factor model revealed consistent goodness-of-fit (IFI = 0.946) when compared to other models. There was no correlation between visual analogue pain scale and the total BPCS-C score; however, there was an association between pain catastrophizing and difficulty in doing physical activities in school (p= 0.01). BPCS-C total scores were not different between groups. We found a marginal association with BPCS-C (r= 0.27, p= 0.01) and salivary BDNF levels. Discussion BPCS-C is a valid instrument with consistent psychometric properties. The revised 2-dimension proposed can be used for this population. Children catastrophism is well correlated with physical limitation, but the absence of BPCS-C score differences between groups highlights the necessity of a better understanding about catastrophic thinking in children.

Pain catastrophizing as a predictor for postoperative opioid requirements for breakthrough pain in patients undergoing elective surgery admitted in a private institution from January 2021 to June 2021

BACKGROUND@#Post-operative pain management is a major challenge encountered by anesthesiologists. Opioids remain to be the most frequently administered analgesic for acute pain despite its many untoward side effects. Little is known about pre-operative pain perception and the psychophysiologic aspects of pain control and response, such as Pain Catastrophizing. The observer aims to identify if pain catastrophizing could be a good predictor for post- operative opioid requirement for breakthrough pain.@*METHODS@#Patients scheduled for elective surgery were stratified pre-operatively as Catastrophizers and Non- Catastrophizers using the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). Their patient profile, and total opioid consumption in the following stages of surgery: intra- operatively, recovery room admission, and the first post-operative day, were recorded and converted to morphine equivalent doses.@*RESULTS@#The comparative analysis of the morphine equivalent doses between catastrophizers and non- catastrophizers show that it is significantly different between the two groups of patients for opioid consumption for breakthrough pain in the recovery room and on the first post-operative day. The values suggest that there are significantly higher doses in catastrophizers than in the non-catastrophizers.@*CONCLUSION@#Pain Catastrophizers were shown to require a significantly higher amount of opioids for breakthrough pain during recovery room admission and first post-operative day versus Non-Catastrophizers. This finding is consistent with the existing literature suggesting that pain catastrophizing is a predictor of post-operative opioid consumption in patients undergoing various elective surgeries.

Impact of pain catastrophizing on disability in patients with low back pain mediated by anxiety and depression / 中华全科医师杂志

Objective:To investigate the effects of anxiety and depressive symptoms in mediation of pain catastrophizing on disability in patients with low back pain.Methods:A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 97 patients with low back pain in the Changjiang Subdistrict community health center from July to October 2021. Oswestry Disability Index, pain catastrophic subscale in Coping Strategies Questionnaire-24, Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-short version, Patient Health Depression Questionnaire-short version were used to evaluate the activity dysfunction, pain catastrophic cognition and anxiety and depression levels of patients,respectively. Path analysis was implemented to test the mediation model, and the indirect effects were assessed using the bootstrap procedure with bias-corrected 95 %CI. Results:Results suggested significant positive correlations among pain catastrophizing, anxiety, depressive symptoms and disability of patients. In addition, both anxiety and depressive symptoms significantly mediated the impact of pain catastrophizing on disability (standardized indirect effects were 0.183 and 0.197, P<0.05). Patients with higher levels of pain catastrophic cognition showed higher levels of anxiety and depressive symptoms (β=0.757, 0.720; P<0.01), and reported more severe motor dysfunction (β=0.241, 0.274; P<0.05). Conclusions:Our findings suggest that anxiety and depression may be the psychological pathways through which pain catastrophizing predicts disability in patients with low back pain. Effective psychological interventions, such as emotion regulation and stress reduction strategies should be considered in treatment and supportive care for patients with low back pain.

Relationship between psychosocial factors and effects of acupuncture after four weeks in patients with chronic low back pain (2nd Report) / 全日本鍼灸学会雑誌

[Objective] In the past, we reported results focusing on the immediate effect of psychosocial factors that influence the effects of acupuncture on patients with chronic low back pain. In the present study, we conducted a retrospective analysis of the data before and after four weeks of acupuncture therapy.[Materials and Methods] Fifty-three patients with an initial diagnosis of chronic low back pain who visited the Acupuncture Department of the Center for Integrative Medicine, Tsukuba University of Technology between August and December 2019 and showed baseline lumbar pain intensity by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) > 30 mm, were subjects of this study. Psychosocial scales viz, Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ), social factors (cohabitation family situation, final education, social participation status), Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ), and impression of acupuncture were recorded using a self-administered questionnaire at the first visit and at four weeks after the first acupuncture therapy. Based on VAS, RDQ, and anchor questions about low back pain before and four weeks after the acupuncture therapy, patients were classified into "effective group" and "non-effective group"; then, the logistic regression analysis was performed using this classification as a dependent variable. In addition, r repeated measures analysis of variance (rANOVA) was performed on the data before and after four weeks of acupuncture therapy.[Results and Discussion] The number of patients in the "effective group" and "non-effective group" were 24 and 29, respectively. Among items used as covariates in the logistic regression analysis, the PCS (OR: 0.924, P = 0.037) and age (OR: 0.418, P = 0.005) showed statistical significance. In the rANOVA, all the evaluated items showed statistically significant differences before and after four weeks; only VAS in motion showed a statistically significant difference (P = 0.046) regarding the presence or absence of an immediate effect. Therefore, it was suggested that it is important to focus on psychosocial factors from an early stage of therapy, and to make appropriate evaluations and judgments based on both physical and psychosocial aspects of patients to treat them effectively.

Pain catastrophizing is associated with the Val66Met polymorphism of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor in fibromyalgia

Abstract Background: Fibromyalgia (FM) is a musculoskeletal chronic pain syndrome that impacts negatively patient's daily lives. Its pathogenesis is characterized by a complex relationship between biological and psychosocial factors not fully understood yet. Pain catastrophizing is associated with FM and is an important predictor of outcomes. This study aimed to answer two questions: (i) whether the allele and genotype frequencies of BDNF Val66Met (rs6265) polymorphism differs between FM patients and healthy controls (HC); and (ii) if the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism is a factor that predicts pain catastrophizing in FM. Methods: In a cross-sectional design, 108 FM patients and 108 HC were included. FM patients responded to the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (BP-PCS) to assess pain catastrophizing, as well as other validated tools for anxiety (The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory - STAI), depression (Beck Depression Inventory II -BDI-II) and functional aspects (Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire - FIQ; Central Sensitization Inventory validated and adapted for Brazilian population - CSI-BP; Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index - PSQI; and Resilience Scale). All subjects were genotyped for the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism. Results: Val allele was significantly more frequent in FM patients compared to the control group (p < 0.05). Also, FM patients with Val/Val genotype showed more pain catastrophizing thoughts, and this genotype was significantly associated with magnification and rumination dimensions of BP-PCS (p < 0.05). Furthermore, there were significant differences in levels of anxiety and symptoms of depression, years of education, and the functional situation between the FM and control groups. Conclusions: The findings show an association of BDNF Val66Met polymorphism with pain catastrophizing in FM, which opens new avenues to comprehend the interplay between molecular genetic characteristics and neuroplasticity mechanisms underpinning FM.(AU)

Evaluación del catastrofismo en pacientes con lumbalgia crónica en la unidad de dolor de un hospital universitario / Evaluation of pain catastrophizing in chronic back pain patientsof a university hospital pain unit

El catastrofismo es la percepción mental, negativa y exagerada, respecto a la experiencia del dolor, tanto real como anticipada. Comprende tres dimensiones: rumiación, magnificación y desesperanza. Sus consecuencias son: dolor más intenso, mayor consumo de analgésicos, disminución de las actividades diarias, incapacidad laboral, mayor sensibilidad al dolor, interferencia en el uso de estrategias de afrontamiento y peor pronóstico general. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar el nivel de catastrofismo ante el dolor en pacientes con lumbalgia crónica que consultan en nuestro hospital universitario, utilizando la escala de catastrofismo del dolor en su versión en español. La muestra fue de 69 pacientes, se encontró una correlación lineal positiva entre nivel total de catastrofismo y sus tres dimensiones con la intensidad del dolor y la interferencia que éste produce sobre las actividades diarias, medidas a través del inventario abreviado del dolor. Los niveles de catastrofismo encontrados fueron altos, mayores a 30, la intensidad del dolor y su interferencia fueron elevados (mayor de 6). Este es el primer estudio de evaluación del catastrofismo en pacientes con dolor crónico en nuestro país. Los niveles de catastrofismo encontrados obligan a ofrecer en nuestra unidad medidas de intervención que logren reducirlo, de modo de lograr mejores resultados de los tratamientos farmacológicos o intervencionistas que se indican en los pacientes con lumbalgia crónica.

Pain catastrophizing is a cognitive state characterized by a negative and exaggerated perception about actual or anticipating pain. It is conformed for three factors: rumiation, magnification and helplessness. Its consequences in pain perception are increase in pain intensity and analgesic consumption, interference in daily and labor activities, hiperalgesia, interference in coping strategies and general poor clinical prognosis of pain states. The aim of this study was to evaluate pain catastrophizing in chronic back pain outpatients in a university hospital pain unit, utilizing the spanish version of the pain catastrophizing scale. Sixty-nine patients with chronic back pain with or without lumbosacral radicular pain were included. A positive lineal correlation between total catastrophism and its three factors with pain intensity and pain daily activities interference. Pain intensity and interference evaluated by the brief pain Inventory were high (more than 6) and also was the total catastrophism (more than 30). This is the first study in our country about pain catastrophizing in chronic pain patients. The high levels of catastrophism observed in this study must be treated with specific psychological interventions, in order to reduce them in such a way that pharmacological and interventional pain treatments results could be improved.

Neuroticism and pain catastrophizing aggravate response to pain in healthy adults: an experimental study

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the association between neuroticism, pain catastrophizing, and experimentally induced pain threshold and pain tolerance in a healthy adult sample from two regions of the country of Croatia: the island of Korcula and city of Split. METHODS: A total of 1,322 participants were enrolled from the Island of Korcula (n = 824) and the city of Split (n = 498). Participants completed a self-reported personality measure Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ) and pain catastrophizing questionnaire Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), followed by a mechanical pain pressure threshold and tolerance test. We have explored the mediating role of catastrophizing in the relationship between neuroticism and pain intensity. RESULTS: The results showed that pain catastrophizing partially mediated the relationship between neuroticism and pain intensity, suggesting the importance of pain catastrophizing in increasing vulnerability to pain. The results also indicated gender-related differences, marked by the higher pain threshold and tolerance in men. CONCLUSIONS: This study adds to the understanding of the complex interplay between personality and pain, by providing a better understanding of such mechanisms in healthy adults.

Immediate effects of joint mobilization compared to sham and control intervention for pain intensity and disability in chronic low back pain patients: randomized controlled clinical trial / Efeitos imediatos da mobilização articular em relação à intervenção sham e controle na intensidade de dor e incapacidade em pacientes com dor lombar crônica: ensaio clínico aleatorizado controlado

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A possibility to treat chronic low back pain is joint mobilization. There is moderate literature evidence of the effects of mobilization on chronic low back pain; however, few studies have used sham mobilization as comparison group. This study aimed at evaluating the effects of back joint mobilization on the following outcomes: pain intensity and incapacity in chronic low back pain patients. METHODS: Participated in the study 60 individuals of both genders with the following eligibility criteria: aged between 18 and 55 years with chronic nonspecific low back pain for at least three months. Selected volunteers were randomly distributed in three groups of 20 individuals: joint mobilization group MG: 39.15±11.45 years, sham mobilization group SG: 37.10±12.57 years, and control group CG: 30.60±8.97. All groups were evaluated by the same blind investigator and have answered to the following tools pre-and immediately after the ten intervention sessions: pain numeric scale to evaluate pain intensity, Oswestry Disability Index to evaluate low back pain-related incapacity and Catastrophic Thoughts Scale to evaluate pain-related catastrophizing. RESULTS: There were significant pre-and post-treatment differences in pain intensity for MG (p<0.001) and SG (p<0.001). There has been significant difference in mean pain intensity value in MG as compared to CG (-2.55). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest sham effect related to the application of mobilization in chronic low back pain patients.

RESUMO JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: Uma das possibilidades de tratamento da dor lombar crônica são as mobilizações articulares. Há evidência moderada na literatura sobre os efeitos de mobilizações para dor lombar crônica, entretanto, poucos estudos têm utilizado mobilizações-sham como grupo de comparação. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar os efeitos da mobilização articular lombar sobre os seguintes desfechos: intensidade da dor e incapacidade em pacientes com dor lombar crônica. MÉTODOS: Foram selecionados 60 indivíduos de ambos os sexos com os seguintes critérios de elegibilidade: idade entre 18 e 55 anos, que apresentassem dor lombar crônica não específica há pelo menos três meses. Os voluntários selecionados foram distribuídos aleatoriamente em três grupos de 20 indivíduos: grupo mobilização articular GM: 39,15±11,45 anos, grupo mobilização sham GS: 37,10±12,57 anos e grupo controle GC: 30,60±8,97 anos. Todos os grupos foram avaliados por um mesmo pesquisador encoberto e responderam os seguintes instrumentos pré e imediatamente após as 10 sessões de intervenção: escala numérica de dor para avaliação da intensidade da dor, Oswestry Disability Index para avaliação da incapacidade relacionada à dor lombar e Escala de Pensamentos Catastróficos para avaliação da catastrofização relacionada à dor. RESULTADOS: Foram observadas diferenças significativas pré e pós-tratamento para a variável de intensidade de dor nos GM (p<0,001) e GS (p<0,001). Na comparação entre os grupos de intervenção, foi verificada diferença significativa no valor médio de intensidade de dor entre GM versus GC (-2,55). CONCLUSÃO: Os presentes resultados sugerem efeito sham relacionado à aplicação de mobilizações em pacientes com dor lombar crônica.

Psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale for acute low back pain / Propriedades psicométricas da versão brasileira da Escala de Catastrofização da Dor para dor lombar aguda

Measurement instruments of pain catastrophizing for middle-aged and elderly individuals are needed to understand its impact on low back pain. The goals were to cross-culturally adapt the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, assess the construct validity through Rasch analysis, and verify reliability and convergent validity of pain catastrophizing with psychosocial factors. 131 individuals aged 55 years and older with acute low back pain were interviewed . The intra-rater reliability was Kp = 0.80 and interrater Kp = 0.75. The Rasch analysis found adequate reliability coefficients (0.95 for items and 0.90 for individuals ). The separation index for the elderly was 2.95 and 4.59 items. Of the 13 items, one did not fit the model, which was justified in the sample evaluated. The pain catastrophizing correlated with most psychosocial factors. The instrument proved to be clinically useful. Subsequent studies should carry out the same analysis in different populations.

Instrumentos de medida da catastrofização da dor para indivíduos de meia-idade e idosos são necessários para compreensão do impacto na dor lombar nessa população. Os objetivos foram adaptar transculturalmente a Escala de Catastrofização da Dor, avaliar a validade de construto pela análise Rasch, verificar a confiabilidade e a validade convergente da catastrofização da dor com fatores psicossociais. Participaram 131 indivíduos comunitários com 55 anos e mais com dor lombar aguda. A confiabilidade intra-examinadores foi de Kp = 0,80 e inter-examinadores Kp = 0,75. A análise Rasch, detectou adequados coeficientes de confiabilidade (0,95 para itens e 0,90 para indivíduos). O índice de separação dos idosos foi de 2,95 e dos itens 4,59. Dos 13 itens, um não se enquadrou no modelo, o que se justificou na amostra avaliada. A catastrofização da dor se correlacionou com a maioria dos fatores psicossociais. O instrumento mostrou-se clinicamente útil. Estudos subsequentes devem proceder às mesmas análises em diferentes populações.

The Impact of Dry Needling on Patients with Neck Pain in a Tertiary Hospital

Neck pain presents as a symptom of dull pain or discomfort mainly along the trapezius muscle. Dry needling is an invasive procedure which uses acupuncture needle directed at myofascial trigger points. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of dry needling in managing patients with neck pain. A pre-test-post-test interventional study design was used. Patient education package was provided to 32 respondents who fulfilled the inclusion criteria. A 13-item Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) questionnaire was used to assess Rumination, Magnification and Helplessness. Subjective pain intensity was measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). These questionnaires were given before and after the dry needling intervention. The findings reported that respondents scored high in pre-test total PCS score (27.41±13.652). Post-test result revealed a significant improvement in total PCS score (23.06±13.938) (p = 0.000). Post-test VAS score (4.78±1.237) was also significantly better than pre-test (6.47±1.414) (p = 0.000). There was no significant difference in pre-test PCS in terms of marital status (p > 0.05) whereas there was significant difference between marital status and rumination in post-test (Z = -2.303, p = 0.021). There was significant difference between pre-test magnification in terms of respondents’ occupation (p = 0.008) and race (p = 0.035) but no significant difference in post-test. Respondents’ age group showed no significant differences between pre-test and post-test PCS and VAS (p > 0.05). In conclusion, patients who received dry needling showed improvement in pain intensity and catastrophizing towards neck pain.

Salivary cortisol response to electrical stimulation in TMD cases and its relation with pain catastrophizing / 实用口腔医学杂志

Objective:To analyse the salivary cortisol changes in patients with temporomandibular disorders(TMD)after electrical stimulation,and the relationship between cortisol and pain catastrophizing.Methods:1 1 TMD and 1 1 healthy subjects were evoked by electrical stimulation.The saliva samples were collested before test,50 s and 1 00 s of stimulation after test seperately.Salivary cortisol was analysed by ELISA kit.The pain catastrophizing scale(PCS)was answered by all the subjects before stimulation.Data were statis-tically analysed.Results:The salivary cortisol concentration in TMD patients was higher than that in the controls(P <0.05).After stimulation,it showed a downward trend.No interaction between time and groups.The total scores of PCS including three indexes(ru-mination,magnification,helpless)were positively correlated with salivary cortisol concentration.Conclusion:The unpredictable stress causes high level of cortisol.which is related to pain catastrophizing.