Euthanasia revisited: The aruna shanbaug verdict.

Euthanasia and its procedure have long history of locking horns as a vexed issue with laws of countries across the world. Every human being of adult years and sound mind has a right to determine what shall be done with his/her own body. It is unlawful to administer treatment to an adult who is conscious and of sound mind, without his consent. In patients with Permanently Vegetative State (PVS) and no hope of improvement, the distinction between refusing life saving medical treatment (passive euthanasia) and giving lethal medication is logical, rational, and well established. It is ultimately for the Court to decide, as parens patriae, as to what is in the best interest of the patient. An erroneous decision not to terminate results in maintenance of the status quo; the possibility of subsequent developments such as advancements in medical science, the discovery of new evidence regarding the patient’s intent, changes in the law, or simply the unexpected death of the patient despite the administration of life-sustaining treatment, at least create the potential that a wrong decision will eventually be corrected or its impact mitigated.

Terminalidad de la vida: aspectos médico-legales de la eutanasia / End of life: medical and legal aspects of the euthanasia

El progreso de la ciencia médica y sus efectos sobre el ser humano encuentran en la muerte un límite ético a sus posibilidades. El progreso médico, en ocasiones, se opone a los derechos de los pacientes, apareciendo la eutanasia como uno de sus principales conflictos. La discusión bioética debe resolver el dilema sobre permitir o no la muerte de todo paciente terminal que así lo desee. Algunas legislaciones han permitido la eutanasia, basadas en la autonomía del paciente, cuando aparecen situaciones que no permiten una buena calidad de vida en pacientes que padecen enfermedades terminales. El propósito de este artículo es realizar un análisis acerca de la eutanasia con el objetivo de clarificar los conceptos, sus aspectos bioéticos y realizar un análisis del proyecto de ley que pretende aprobar la eutanasia en Chile, encontrándose en dicho proyecto muchas contradicciones dentro del mismo y en relación con la legislación chilena en general.

The progress of medical science and their effect on the human being find in the death the ethical limits to their possibilities. The medical science, sometimes, opposes to the patients rights, so appear the euthanasia like one of these principals' troubles. The bioethics discussion must to resolve the question about to permit the possibilities of death to all terminals patients who don't want to continue with their lives. Some legislation has permitted the euthanasia based on autonomy of the patients when some situation doesn't permit one well quality of life in patients with terminal illness. The purpose of this paper is to make an analysis about the euthanasia with the object to clarify some concepts, their bioethical aspects and to analyze the Chilean project of law which pretends to regulate the euthanasia, finding many contradictions inside the project and in their relation with the Chilean legislation in general.

An Analysis of Attitudes on Euthanasia between Residents and Judicial Apprentices

BACKGROUND: Recently, the legal and ethical issues relative to euthanasia are becoming controversial in Korea. This study was designed to verify the differences of the attitudes on euthanasia between judicial apprentices and residents. METHODS: The questionnaire was conducted on the 35th-group of the judicial apprentices on March 24, 2004, and on the residents from April 2 to May 22, 2004. The respondents were 636 in total consisting of 460 judicial apprentices and 176 residents. RESULTS: Of the total 636 subjects, 373 (81.1%) of the judicial apprentices and 149 (84.7%) of residents agreed that allowing euthanasia is moral, without any significant difference (P>0.05). The number of residents was greater (59 people, 33.5%) than that of judicial apprentices (112 people, 24.4%) who agreed with active euthanasia (P0.05). But, among these supporters, the respondents who agreed on active euthanasia were significantly different in number between judicial apprentices (n=93, 23.4%) and residents (n=54, 33.8%) (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: This study did not find any significant differences between the two groups in the necessity of the law for euthanasia, but the rate of agreement on active euthanasia was higher in residents group than in judicial apprentices group.

Discussion on Withdrawing Treatment and Passive Euthanasia of Patients with Malignant Tumors / 中国医学伦理学

Withdrawing medical treatment is quite common among patients with malignant tumors in present clinical practice in China,which is considered as a form of passive euthanasia and serious violation against social ethics and medical purposes.In this paper,the behaviors and reasons for withdrawing treatment of patients with malignant tumors are analyzed,and concerned solutions are explored as well.