Spino-Pelvic Parameters in Adult Spinal Deformities / 대한정형외과학회잡지

In the recent 10 to 15 years, the most popular issue in the spine field is evaluation and treatment of the sagittal alignment and sagittal balance of the spine. Adult spine deformity (ASD) includes not only coronal deformity, such as degenerative scoliosis, but also sagittal deformity. Degenerative scoliosis is also associated with sagittal deformity of the spine. Even in degenerative scoliosis, accompanying sagittal deformity is more important to clinical symptoms than coronal deformity. Sagittal deformity of the spine is significantly correlated with health-related quality of life score, such as visual analogue scale and Oswestry disability index, short form-36 health survey. For the appropriate evaluation and treatment of ASD, understanding the normal and abnormal sagittal alignment and sagittal balance of the spine is very important. Various compensatory mechanisms should be applied in order to maintain the balanced upright posture. Assessment of the compensatory mechanism is also mandatory for proper surgical planning. Some spinopelvic parameters show particularly high correlation with clinical symptoms in case of sagittal imbalance. Therefore, assessment of these parameters is necessary for evaluation of surgical outcomes.

Clinical Implications of Spino-pelvic Parameters for the Outcome of Spinal Surgery for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases

STUDY DESIGN: A review of the literature. OBJECTIVES: To discuss how to evaluate, interpret, and utilize measurements of spino-pelvic alignment before and after spinal surgery in patients with lumbar degenerative disease. SUMMARY OF LITERATURE REVIEW: Various spino-pelvic parameters are currently utilized in the evaluation of spinal patients; however, interpretation of these parameters is not easy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Each spino-pelvic parameter and factors affecting its value, and how to interpret and utilize the spino-pelvic parameters before and after spinal surgery were discussed for patients with lumbar degenerative disease with and without sagittal spinal deformity. RESULTS: Sagittal modifiers in the SRS-Schwab classification including pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and pelvic tilt (PT) are widely accepted in the evaluation of lumbar degenerative disease with sagittal deformity. Surgery for sagittal realignment is meant to restore both the SVA and PT by restoring the LL in reference to the PI. However, patients with an extremely high SVA and PT or those with a high SVA and low PT can end up with postoperative residual malalignment. In patients without deformity, PI-LL mismatch (> 10°) should be highlighted and should be actively corrected by restoring the lordosis of the pathologic segment. CONCLUSIONS: Sagittal modifiers are beneficial for their simplicity and comprehensibility; however, they are insufficient for evaluating sub-regional spinal deformity. Spino-pelvic parameters can be useful for evaluating spinal patients in a clinical setting, but the measurements are greatly affected by confounding factors such as poor patient posture, unqualified testers, and manual measurement techniques.

Correlation of Pelvic Parameters with Isthmic Spondylolisthesis

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective radiological evaluation. PURPOSE: To verify that PI is related with progression of IS as well as development of IS and to assess the differences of pelvic parameters between the L4 & L5 IS, as well as between single & two level IS. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: High pelvic incidence (PI) has been known to be related with development of IS. However, the previous studies were limited to just L5 spondylolisthesis or there was no differentiation between L4 & L5 spondylolisthesis METHODS: Sixty five IS patients and 30 persons as a control group participated the study. Among the 65 patients, 30 had L4 IS, 30 had L5 IS and 5 had bi-level IS. We used the whole spine lateral radiographs to measure the slip percentage, the pelvic tilt (PT) and the pelvic incidence (PI), and we compared them between the normal control group and the IS patients, as well as between single-level and bi-level spondylolisthesis, and we investigated the correlation between the degree of slip of spondylolisthesis and the pelvic parameters. RESULTS: The averages of the PT, PI and lumbar lordosis (LL) in the control group and the IS group were 11.0degrees vs 21.4degrees (p0.05). On comparison between the single-level IS group and the bilevel IS group, there was a significant difference of the PT and PI (p<0.05), and the slip percentage had a correlation with only the PI among all the pelvic parameters (Spearman's r=0.293, p=0.023). There was a significant correlation of the degree of slip with the PI for the L5 single level IS, but not with the L4 single level IS (r=0.362, p=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The high pelvic incidence can be a factor of L4 & L5 spondylolysis and it may have an influence on the slip progression in patients with L5 isthmic spondylolisthesis, but not on the slip progression in patients with L4 IS. Yet other factors seem to have an influence on the slip progression in patients with L4 isthmic spondylolisthesis.