Abdominal perineal resection surgery: case report

Colorectal cancer in known to be the most diagnosed cancer in the world, the set gold standard for the treatment of colorectal cancer is excision of the tumor via surgery. There is different type of surgeries that tend to be performed depending on the location, size and extent of the mass in order to avoid recurrence. The main aim of this paper is to discuss the abdominal perineal resection surgery together with the complications faced and criteria in managing these complications intraoperatively.

Estudio comparativo de los resultados del tratamiento del carcinoma anal escamoso en los pacientes HIV positivos y negativos / Comparative study of the results of the treatment of squamous anal carcinoma in HIV positive and negative patients

Introducción: El tratamiento del carcinoma anal escamoso (CAE) en los pacientes HIV positivos resulta controvertido. Si bien las guías actuales recomiendan realizar en los pacientes con buen estado inmunológico la quimiorradioterapia (QRT) concurrente estándar, algunos autores consideran que estos pacientes presentan mayor toxicidad y peores resultados a largo plazo, por lo que requerirían un abordaje diferente. El objetivo de este trabajo es comparar los resultados del tratamiento del CAE en los pacientes VIH positivos y negativos. Diseño: Estudio retrospectivo comparativo. Pacientes y métodos: Se revisaron retrospectivamente las historias clínicas de los pacientes tratados en el Sector Coloproctología, Hospital Fernández, entre 01/2007 y 10/2018. Los del conducto anal se dividieron en: Grupo I: VIH negativos y Grupo II: VIH positivos. Se compararon variables demográficas, factores de riesgo específicos, estadificación, QRT (drogas, toxicidad y respuesta), tratamiento quirúrgico curativo/paliativo, persistencia/recurrencia y supervivencia específica y global. Resultados: Se incluyeron 28 pacientes (18 mujeres); margen: 2, conducto: 26 (Grupo I: 15. Grupo II: 11). Los VIH positivos eran en su mayoría hombres que tienen sexo con hombres vs. 100% de mujeres VIH negativas (p<0,01), más jóvenes (45,2±0,9 vs. 63,6±8; p<0,01) y tabaquistas (82% vs. 27%; p=0,005). No hubo diferencia significativa en la estadificación, aunque el Grupo II tuvo tumores con complicaciones más severas. Pudieron completar el tratamiento: Grupo I: 93%, Grupo II: 64% (p<0,05). Tuvieron respuesta completa a la QRT 13/14 (93%) pacientes del Grupo I y 3/7 (43%) del Grupo II (p<0,01). Hubo 3 recurrencias, 2 locorregionales y 1 a distancia (p=NS). Los VIH positivos requirieron más cirugías (82% vs. 27%; p<0,01). A 5 pacientes (4 del Grupo II) se les realizó una resección abdominoperineal (RAP). Tuvieron colostomía definitiva, con o sin RAP, el 46% de los pacientes, la mayoría VIH positivos (82% vs. 27%; p=0,002). En los VIH positivos el RR de mortalidad por cáncer fue 4 (IC95%: 1,01-16,5; p=0,02) y el RR de mortalidad global fue 5,45 (IC95%: 1,42-20,8; p=0,002). Tuvieron menor supervivencia, tanto global (p=0,001) como libre de enfermedad (p=0,01). Mediana de seguimiento: 27 meses (4-216).Conclusiones: Los pacientes VIH positivos con CAE se diferenciaron de los VIH negativos en una menor tasa de respuesta completa a la QRT y una mayor necesidad de tratamiento quirúrgico. Además, tuvieron una supervivencia global y libre de enfermedad significativamente menor que los VIH negativos. (AU)

INTRODUCTION: The treatment of anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in HIV-positive patients is controversial. Although current guidelines recommend performing standard concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with good immune status, some authors believe that these patients have greater toxicity and worse long-term results, so they would require a different approach. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of SCC treatment in HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients.DESIGN: Comparative retrospective study.PATIENTS AND METHODS: The records of patients treated in the Coloproctology Section, Hospital Fernández, between 01/2007 and 10/2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Those of the anal canal were divided into: Group I: HIV-negative and Group II: HIV-positive. Demographic variables, specific risk factors, staging, CRT (drugs, toxicity, and response), curative/palliative surgical treatment, persistence/recurrence, and cancer-specific and global survival were compared.RESULTS: 28 patients (18 women), margin: 2, conduit: 26 (Group I: 15. Group II: 11). The HIV-positive were mostly men who have sex with men (vs. 100% HIV-negative women; p<0.01), younger (45.2 ± 0.9 vs. 63.6 ± 8; p<0.01) and smokers (82% vs. 27%; p=0.005). There was no significant difference in staging, although Group II had tumors with more severe complications. Completed the treatment: Group I: 93%, Group II: 64% of patients (p<0,05). Thirteen out of 14 (93%) patients in Group I, and 3/7 (43%) patients in Group II had a complete response to CRT (p<0.01). There were 3 recurrences, 2 loco-regional and 1 distance (p=NS). HIV-positive required more surgery (82% vs. 27%; p<0.01). 5 patients (4 of Group II) underwent an abdominal-perineal resection (APR). Forty six percent of patients had permanent colostomy, with or without APR, most of them were HIV-positive (82% vs. 27%; p=0.002). In HIV-positive patients, the RR of cancer mortality was 4 (95% CI: 1.01-16.5; p=0.02) and the RR of overall mortality was 5.45 (95% CI: 1.42-20, 8; p=0.002). They also had lower overall (p=0.001) and disease-free survival (p=0.01). Median follow-up: 27 months (4 - 216).CONCLUSION: HIV-positive patients with anal SCC were different from HIV-negative patients in that they had a lower complete response rate to CRT, and a greater need for surgical treatment. They had a significantly lower overall and disease-free survival than HIV-negative patients. (AU)

Surgical treatment of anorectal malignant melanoma from single tertiary center: A retrospective analysis of 91 cases / 中国实用外科杂志

OBJECTIVE:To investigate the surgical treatment of anorectal malignant melanoma(ARMM) and the prognostic factors that affect patients' overall survival(OS).METHODS:Theclinical and pathological data of 91 patients diagnosed as ARMM, who underwent surgery in the Gastrointestinal Cancer Center of Peking University Cancer Hospital from January 2003 to January 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The effects of different clinicopathological factors on OS of the patients, and difference surgery, abdominal-perineal resection(APR) and wide local excision(WLE) on patients' survival were compared.RESULTS:Of the 91 patients with ARMM, 35(38.5%) were male, 56(61.5%) were female, and the ratio of male to female was 1:1.6. 12 patients(13.2%) underwent wide local excision and 79 patients underwent abdominal-perineal resection(86.8%); there were 19 cases(20.9%) diagnosed with distant metastasis and 72 cases(79.1%)without distant metastasis. The of 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of ARMM patients in this cohort were 74%, 23% and9%; and the median survival of the patients was 18.7 months. The univariate analysis of the clinicopathological features of the patients demonstrated that the preoperative distant metastases, tumor diameters(>2 cm), tumor invasion depth(>2 mm) and lymph node metastasis were the prognostic factors of OS; multivariate analysis showed that preoperative distant metastasis and lymph node metastasis were independent factors affecting OS.The median survival of the patients admitted APR and WLE were both 21 months. There was no significant difference in survival between the WLE and APR group(P=0.94).CONCLUSION:Preoperative distant metastasis and lymph node metastasis are independent prognostic factors for overall survival of ARMM patients.Comparing with WLE, APR could not bring survival benefits.

Rectosigmoidectomía perineal para el tratamiento del prolapso rectal completo / Perineal rectosigmoidectomy for the treatment of rectal prolapse

Objetivo: Presentamos nuestra experiencia en el tratamiento quirúrgico de esta patología con la técnica de la rectosigmoidectomía perineal. Material y método: Se trata de una serie retrospectiva, consecutiva de 17 pacientes. Resultados: Predomina el género femenino y el promedio de edad es de 62 años. La morbilidad alcanza el 23%, aunque casi toda de menor gravedad, con solo un paciente reoperado. La recidiva es del 6%, con mejoría de los síntomas en un 88%. Conclusión: Concluimos que es una técnica segura, con una morbilidad controlada y con buenos resultados a mediano plazo con un adecuado control de la recidiva y mejoría de la continencia en un alto porcentaje de los pacientes.

Aim: We present our experience with perineal rectosigmoidectomy for the treatment of rectal prolapse. Material and method: It is a retrospective, consecutive series of 17 patients. Results: Predominantly female and the average age is 62 years. Morbidity reached 23%, but almost all less serious, with only one reoperation. Recurrence is 6%, and the improvement in continence is 88%. Conclusion: We conclude that it is a safe technique with a controlled morbidity and good results with low recurrence and improvement of continence in a high percentage of patients.

The study of cylindrical abdominal perineal resection for rectal cancer and pelvic floor reconstruction improvement / 重庆医学

Objective To study the abdominal perineal resection for rectal cancer and clinical application of pelvic floor recon-struction .Methods 30 cases of rectal cancer patients from 2008-2011 were randomly divided into experimental group and the con-trol group ,30 cases in each group .Experimental group patients by columnar abdominal perineal resection of rectal cancer treatment , postoperative pelvic floor defect for dermal matrix reconstruction .The control group patients for colorectal cancer resection by lapa-rotomy .Results Compared with the traditional open resection ,the operation time ,intraoperative blood loss ,postoperative patholog-ical column T3 N0 M0 positive rate ,incidence of complications and incision aspect of cylindrical abdominal perineal resection were ob-vious advantages ,the difference was statistically significant (P< 0 .05) .Conclusion Compared with Miles surgery ,cylindrical ab-dominal perineal resection for rectal cancer can reduce the incidence of postoperative incisal edge positive rate and bowel perfora -tion .Human decellularized dermal matrix basin redevelopment can significantly reduce the surgical risk and difficulty of surgical op-erations .