Alternativa factible para la neuroestimulación intraoperatoria durante la cirugía del plexo braquial / Feasible alternative for intraoperative neurostimulation during brachial plexus surgery

Introducción: La neuroestimulación intraoperatoria constituye una técnica esencial durante la cirugía del plexo braquial, pues permite la identificación específica de las estructuras neurales. En determinadas circunstancias, la intensidad precisa de la estimulación nerviosa y la respuesta motora evocada, las cuales son fundamentales para la toma de decisiones críticas durante el acto quirúrgico. Objetivo: Describir la utilización de un neuroestimulador de anestesia regional para la localización neural intraoperatoria durante la cirugía del plexo braquial en dos pacientes. Presentación de casos: Caso 1: paciente con diagnóstico de lesión del fascículo lateral del plexo braquial derecho y lesión alta del nervio radial homolateral. La estimulación neural, con estímulos graduales y progresivos, permite la diferenciación adecuada de los nervios mediano, cubital, musculocutáneo y cutáneo braquial lateral, el fascículo motor del nervio cubital que inerva el músculo cubital anterior, y el fascículo motor del nervio musculocutáneo que inerva el bíceps, lo que posibilita la neurotización entre ambos fascículos. Caso 2: paciente con diagnóstico de lesión total del plexo braquial izquierdo, posganglionar. Luego de la exploración y neurólisis, se identificó el tronco superior, se efectuó la estimulación eléctrica gradual, lo que requirió una elevada intensidad, y se registó, únicamente, como respuesta motora evocada la contracción débil del músculo pectoral mayor ipsilateral. Conclusiones: La utilización de un neuroestimulador de anestesia regional para la localización neural durante la cirugía del plexo braquial, presenta ventajas prácticas relevantes en relación con los neuroestimuladores desechables, así como una relación costo-beneficio apropiada para su implementación en entornos y naciones de recursos limitados(AU)

Introduction: Intraoperative neurostimulation is an essential technique during brachial plexus surgery, as it allows the specific identification of neural structures. In certain circumstances, the precise intensity of nerve stimulation and the evoked motor response are fundamental for making critical decisions during the surgical act. Objective: Describe the use of a neurostimulator of regional anaesthesia for intraoperative neural localization during brachial plexus surgery in two patients. Case presentation: Case 1: patient diagnosed with lesion of the lateral fasciculus of the right brachial plexus and high lesion of the homolateral radial nerve. Neural stimulation, with gradual and progressive stimuli, allows the adequate differentiation of the median, ulnar, musculocutaneous and lateral brachial cutaneous nerves, the motor fasciculus of the ulnar nerve that innervates the anterior ulnar muscle, and the motor fasciculus of the musculocutaneous nerve that innervates the biceps, which enables neurotization between both fascicles. Case 2: patient diagnosed with total lesion of the left brachial plexus, postganglionic. After the exploration and neurolysis, the upper trunk was identified, the gradual electrical stimulation was carried out, which required a high intensity, and the weak contraction of the ipsilateral pectoralis major muscle was recorded only as an evoked motor response. Conclusions: The use of a neurostimulator of regional anesthesia for neural localization during brachial plexus surgery presents relevant practical advantages in relation to disposable neurostimulators, as well as an appropriate cost-benefit ratio for their implementation in environments and nations of limited resources(AU)

Survey of neuromuscular monitoring and assessment of postoperative residual neuromuscular block in a postoperative anaesthetic care unit

INTRODUCTION@#The use of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) is common during general anaesthesia. Neuromuscular monitoring with a peripheral nerve stimulator (PNS) is essential to prevent postoperative residual neuromuscular block (PRNB), defined as a train-of-four (TOF) ratio < 0.9. PRNB remains a common complication and may contribute to morbidity in the postoperative anaesthetic care unit (PACU).@*METHODS@#An online survey was sent to anaesthesiologists in our department to assess their knowledge and clinical practices related to neuromuscular blockade. Next, a study was conducted on adult patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia requiring NMBAs. Upon admission to the PACU, TOF monitoring was performed.@*RESULTS@#A large proportion of anaesthesiologists showed a lack of knowledge of neuromuscular blockade or non-adherence to the best clinical practices associated with it. The majority (98.7%) stated that they did not routinely use PNS monitoring. In the clinical study, TOF monitoring was only used in 17.9% of the 335 patients who were assessed. The prevalence of PRNB was 33.4% and was associated with the elderly (age ≥ 65 years), a higher dose of NMBA used, a shorter duration of surgery, and a shorter duration between the last dose of NMBA and measurement of PRNB in the PACU. The incidence of adverse symptoms in the PACU was observed to be higher in patients with PRNB.@*CONCLUSION@#PRNB remains a clinically significant problem, but routine PNS monitoring is rare in our institution. This is compounded by inadequate knowledge and poor adherence to best clinical guidelines related to neuromuscular blockade.

Comparative study between dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine in supraclavicular block

Background: With the addition of adjuvants to local anaesthetics the onset, duration and quality of brachial plexus block improves to a marked extent. The intent of this study was to compare onset, duration of sensory and motor block along with duration of analgesia when an ?-2 agonist dexmedetomidine or a steroid dexamethasone was added to a mixture of 2% lignocaine with adrenaline and 0.5% bupivacaine.Methods: 100 patients belonging to ASAI and ASAII were included in the study scheduled for upper limb surgeries after taking informed consent. These patients were divided in to two groups having 50 patients in each group. Group D received 20ml of 2% lignocaine with adrenaline plus 18ml of 0.5% bupivacaine plus 50?g of dexmedetomidine and group X received 20ml of 2% lignocaine with adrenaline plus 18ml of 0.5% bupivacaine plus 8mg of dexamethasone. Onset of sensory and motor block, duration of block, quality of intraoperative analgesia and duration of analgesia were recorded.Results: Our study revealed similar onset of sensory block in group D and X. Group D showed early onset and longer duration of motor block compared to group X. Intraoperative haemodynamics were similar in both groups.Conclusions: Our study concludes that using dexmedetomidine as adjuvant prolongs the duration of block and postoperative analgesia compared to dexamethasone with minimal or negligible adverse events.

Bloqueo del nervio femoral con estimulador de nervio periférico en la artroscopia de rodilla / Femoral nerve block with peripheral nerve stimulator in knee arthroscopy

Introducción: el bloqueo del nervio femoral es una de las técnicas básicas del bloqueo nervioso. Objetivo: describir los resultados del bloqueo del nervio femoral con estimulador de nervio periférico en pacientes intervenidos de artroscopia de rodilla. Método: estudio observacional, descriptivo, prospectivo de corte longitudinal. La muestra estuvo integrada por 84 pacientes intervenidos de artroscopia de rodilla en los cuales se utilizó el bloqueo del nervio femoral como técnica anestésica. Se incluyeron pacientes mayores de 18 años, con estado físico I-III según la Sociedad Americana de Anestesiología (ASA), sin alergia conocida a los anestésicos locales y sin contraindicaciones para las técnicas regionales; se excluyeron del estudio aquellos pacientes con intervención quirúrgica ilioinguinal previa, con tumoraciones en región inguinal o neuropatía femoral. Resultados: la calidad del bloqueo fue buena en 90,5 por ciento, de los pacientes, regular en 7,1 por ciento y mala en el 2,4 por ciento. La media del tiempo de analgesia al movimiento fue de 15,17 h (DE 10,52), con un mínimo de 4,17 y un máximo de 28,40 h. Las complicaciones fueron escasas (9,52 por ciento). La más frecuente resultó la parestesia y el bloqueo insatisfactorio en 4,8 y 2,4 por ciento respectivamente. El grado de pacientes satisfechos fue el 95,2 por ciento del total. Conclusiones: el tiempo de analgesia en más de la mitad de los pacientes fue mayor de 12 h y la intensidad del dolor en el rango de dolor leve-moderado, tanto en reposo como al realizar algún movimiento. Las complicaciones fueron escasas, la más frecuente fue la parestesia. La técnica se asocia con elevados niveles de satisfacción por parte de los pacientes(AU)

Introduction: The femoral nerve block is one of the basic nerve block techniques. Objective: To describe the results of femoral nerve block with peripheral nerve stimulator in patients undergoing knee arthroscopy. Method: Observational, descriptive, prospective and longitudinal study. The sample consisted of 84 patients undergoing knee arthroscopy, in whom femoral nerve block was used as an anesthetic technique. Patients older than 18 years were included, with physical status I-III according to the American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA), without known allergy to local anesthetics and without contraindications for regional techniques; patients with previous ilioinguinal surgery, and with tumors in the inguinal region or femoral neuropathy, were excluded from the study. Results: The block quality was good in 90.5 percent of the patients, regular in 7.1 percent, and poor in 2.4 percent. The average time of analgesia to movement was 15.17 hours (SD 10.52), with a minimum of 4.17 and a maximum of 28.40 hours. Complications were minimal (9.52 percent). The most frequent was paresthesia and the unsatisfactory block, in 4.8 and 2.4 percent, respectively. The degree of satisfied patients was 95.2 percent of the total. Conclusions: The analgesic time in more than half of the patients was greater than 12 hours, while the pain intensity was in the range of mild to moderate, both at rest and when performing some movement. Complications were minimal, the most frequent was paresthesia. The technique is associated with high levels of satisfaction as expressed by the patients(AU)

Comparison of the effects between the modified and classic coracoid approach in infraclavicular brachial plexus nerve block / 中国医师进修杂志

Objective To investigate the effects between the modified and classic coracoid approach in infraclavicular brachial plexus nerve block.Methods Sixty patients scheduled for elective surgical procedures under infraclavicular brachial plexus block were divided into observation group and control group by table of random digit method with 30 cases each.The puncture point of control group was approach via the point 2 cm medial and caudal to the coracoid process.The puncture point of observation group was modified by surface projection of the brachial plexus.Peripheral nerve stimulator was used to confirm the proper localization of the plexus.The performance time,number of puncture,anesthesia success rate,incidence of complications and 24 h patient satisfaction were recorded.Results The performance time in observation group was less than that in control group [(3.2 ± 1.1) min vs.(4.3 ± 1.4) min](P＜ 0.05).The chance of locating the brachial plexus in a single puncture without adjusting the block needle in observation group was significantly higher than that in control group [73.3％ (22/30) vs.50.0％ (15/30)] (P ＜ 0.05).There were no statistical differences in anesthesia success rate,incidence of complications and 24 h patient satisfaction between two groups (P ＞ 0.05).Conclusions The modified coracoid approach can significantly improve the probability of locating the nerve in one puncture that reduces the performance time.It can improve the accuracy of puncture point position on the body surface.