A comparison of the sealing abilities between Biodentine and MTA as root-end filling materials and their effects on bone healing in dogs after periradicular surgery

ABSTRACT Objectives: To compare the sealing ability and biocompatibility of Biodentine with mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) when used as root-end filling materials. Methodology: The Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assay was used to compare the cytotoxicity of MTA and Biodentine. Twenty-one extracted teeth with a single canal were immersed in an acidic silver nitrate solution after root-end filling. Then, the volume and depth of silver nitrate that infiltrated the apical portion of the teeth were analyzed using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). Seventy-two roots from 3 female beagle dogs were randomly distributed into 3 groups and apical surgery was performed. After six months, the volume of the bone defect surrounding these roots was analyzed using micro-CT. Results: Based on the results of the CCK-8 assay, MTA and Biodentine did not show statistically significant differences in cytotoxicity (P>0.05). The volume and the depth of the infiltrated nitrate solution were greater in the MTA group than in the Biodentine group (P<0.05). The volume of the bone defect was larger in the MTA group than in the Biodentine group. However, the difference was not significant (P>0.05). The volumes of the bone defects in the MTA and Biodentine groups were smaller than the group without any filling materials (P<0.05). Conclusions: MTA and Biodentine exhibited comparable cellular biocompatibility. Biodentine showed a superior sealing ability to MTA in root-end filling. Both Biodentine and MTA promoted periradicular bone healing in beagle dog periradicular surgery models.

Comparison of isthmus detection methods in the apical third of mesial roots of maxillary and mandibular first molars: macroscopic observation versus operating microscope

The aims of this study were to assess the presence and the frequency of isthmuses in the mesial roots of the maxillary and mandibular first molars (at two resection levels from the apex), and to compare the findings obtained by macroscopic observation (MO) and operating microscope (OM). Forty maxillary and 40 mandibular mesial roots were observed at 3 and 5 mm from the apex initially macroscopically and then with the use of an OM. The presence of an isthmus and the number of root canals detected were recorded. Data were analyzed statistically by Fisher's exact test for isthmus evaluation and Wilcoxon signed rank-test for number of root canals at a confidence interval of 95 percent. Comparison between MO and OM regarding the number of roots with isthmuses provided the following results: Mandibular group: At 3 mm level: MO 19 ?s. OM 27; at 5 mm level: MO 31 ?s. OM 32. Maxillary group: At 3 mm level: MO 9 ?s. OM 14; at 5 mm level: MO 19 ?s. OM 21. Significant differences (p<0.05) were found concerning the accuracy of the isthmus detection methods at both resection levels (3 and 5 mm) and both types of roots, as well as for the number of the canals inspected under the OM between the two resection levels of the mesial roots of the maxillary first molars. Under the tested conditions, OM increased the diagnostic accuracy of isthmus detection at both resection levels and root types.

Os objetivos deste estudo foram avaliar a presença e a freqüência de istmos nas raízes mesiais de primeiros molares superiores e inferiores (em dois níveis de ressecção a partir do ápice), e comparar os achados obtidos por observação macroscópica (OM) e microscópio operativo (MO). Quarenta raízes mesiais superiores e inferiores foram examinadas a 3 e 5 mm do ápice, inicialmente macroscopicamente e em seguida com o uso do MO. A presença de istmo e o número de canais radiculares detectado foram registrados. Os dados foram analisados estatisticamente usando o teste exato de Fisher para avaliação do istmo e o teste de Wilcoxon (signed rank-test) para o número de canais radiculares, com um intervalo de confiança de 95 por cento. A comparação entre OM e MO com relação ao número de raízes com istmos forneceu os seguintes resultados: Grupo mandibular: 3 mm: OM 19 vs. MO 27; 5 mm: OM 31 vs. MO 32. Grupo maxilar: 3 mm: OM 9 vs. MO 14; 5 mm: OM 19 vs. MO 21. Diferenças significantes (p<0,05) foram encontradas com relação à precisão dos métodos de detecção de istmos em ambos os níveis de ressecção (3 e 5 mm), e ambos os tipos de raízes, bem como quanto ao número de canais radiculares inspecionados sob MO entre os dois níveis de ressecção das raízes mesiais dos primeiros molares superiores. Nas condições testadas, MO aumentou a precisão diagnóstica na detecção de istmos em ambos os níveis de ressecção e tipos de raízes.

Effect of resorbable membrane on immediate placement of implant in extraction socket during periradicular surgery / 대한치주과학회지

PURPOSE: The guided bone regeneration (GBR) technique is widely used in periradicular surgery. However, there is still some controversy regarding the effectiveness of GBR in promoting bone healing after periradicular surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the resorbable membrane on the osteointegration of immediate implants in sites with periradicular lesion that had been removed by periradicular surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six roots of lower second premolars and 15 roots of lower third and fourth premolars of dogs were used as control and experimental teeth, respectively. Periradicular lesions were induced only in the experimental teeth. Twelve weeks later, the control and experimental teeth were extracted and implants were placed immediately. Periradicular lesions were removed with osteotomy, curettage and saline irrigation. Resorbable membranes were used in experimental group 1 but not in experimental group 2. After 12 week of healing period, the implants were clinically not mobile and showed no signs of infection. Data obtained by histomorphometric analysis were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: The control group showed a significantly higher bone to implant contact (BIC) (74.14+/-16.18) than experimental group 1 (40.28+/-15.96) and 2 (48.70+/-17.75)(p<0.05). However, there was no significant difference between experimental group 1 and 2. CONCLUSION: Although BIC in experimental groups were lower than in control group, immediate implant can be successfully placed at extraction socket with periradicular lesion and osseous defect. However, the use of resorbable membrane in bony defect created during periradicular surgery was questioned.