Pazopanib for the Treatment of Non-clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Single-Arm, Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase II Study / Journal of the Korean Cancer Association, 대한암학회지

PURPOSE: The optimal treatment strategy for patients with metastatic non-clear cell type renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) remains unclear. Although several inhibitors of vascular endothelial growth factor have recently shown efficacy against nccRCC, the clinical benefit of pazopanib in nccRCC has not been analyzed. We therefore designed a single-arm, open-label, phase II study to determine the efficacy and safety of pazopanib in patients with nccRCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic nccRCC, exceptfor collecting duct or sarcomatoid type, received 800 mg/day of pazopanib daily until progression of disease or intolerable toxicity. One cyclewas defined as 4 weeks and tumor response was evaluated every two cycles. The primary objective was overall response rate (ORR). RESULTS: A total of 29 eligible patients were enrolled at nine centers in Korea from December 2012 and September 2014. The median age of the patients was 58 years (range, 27 to 76 years) and 21 patients (72%) were male. Regarding histology type, 19 patients had papillary, three had chromophobe, two had unclassified and five had unknown non-clear cell type. Of 28 evaluable patients, eight achieved a confirmed partial response with ORR of 28%. The median progression-free survival was 16.5 months (95% confidence interval, 10.9 to 22.1) and median overall survival was not reached. Sixteen patients (55%) experienced treatment-related toxicity of grade 3 or more, but most adverse events were overcome through dose reduction and delay. CONCLUSION: In this prospective phase II study, pazopanib demonstrated promising activity and tolerable safety profile in patients with metastatic nccRCC.

A Multicenter, Open-label Study of Tapentadol Extended-release Tablets in Opioid-naïve and Opioid-switching Subjects with Moderate to Severe Cancer Pain

The present multicenter, open-label study evaluated the efficacy and safety of tapentadol ER administered at 50 mg/day to 500 mg/day in opioid-naive and opioid-switching subjects with moderate to severe cancer pain. For opioid-naive subjects, the initial dose was tapentadol ER 50 mg/day. For opioid-switching subjects, the initial dose was determined depending on previously used opioid and was dose-adjusted for each subject. The study design consists of two parts of titration period and maintenance period to which a patient who achieves dose adjustment can proceed. The percentage of subjects achieving dose adjustment in the titration period was 93.3% for opioid-naive subjects and 80.6% for opioid-switching subjects. The percentage of subjects who maintained adequate analgesia throughout the maintenance period (primary endpoint) was 89.7% for opioid-naive subjects and 92.9% for opioid-switching subjects. The most frequent adverse events were were nausea, vomiting, somnolence, and constipation, all of which were commonly reported with the use of opioids. These findings showed that tapentadol ER was well tolerated in the dose range of 50 mg/day to 500 mg/day.

A prospective, multicenter, phase II clinical study of three-dimensional radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy for stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer-PPRA-RTOG003 / 中华放射肿瘤学杂志

Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of three?dimensional radiotherapy (3DRT) with concurrent chemotherapy for stage IV non?small?cell lung cancer ( NSCLC). Methods A total of 198 eligible patients from 2008 to 2012 were enrolled as subjects. With an age ranging between 18 and 80 years and a Karnofsky Performance Status ( KPS) score of 70 or more, those patients had no contraindication for radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and were newly diagnosed with stage IV NSCLC confirmed by histology or cytology, as well as limited metastatic disease (≤3 organs). Survival rates and acute toxicities in those patients were evaluated. Results The 3?year follow?up rate was 98?? 5% and the 3?year sample size was 165. The median overall survival (OS) and progression?free survival (PFS) were 13?? 0 months (95% CI,11?? 7 ?14?? 3 months) and 9?? 0 months (95% CI,7?? 7 ?10?? 3 months), respectively, while the 1?, 2?, and 3?year OS rates were 53?? 5%, 15?? 8%, and 9?? 2%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that a primary tumor volume smaller than 134 cm3 , a stable or increased KPS score after treatment, and a radiation dose of 63 Gy or more were independent prognostic factors for longer survival time ( P=0?? 008;P= 0?? 010;P= 0?? 014). The incidence rates of grade 3?4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, grade 3 radiation esophagitis, and grade 3 radiation pneumonitis were 37?? 9%, 10?? 1%, 6?? 9%, 2?? 5%, and 6?? 6%, respectively. The main cause of death was distant metastasis, and only 10% of the patients died of recurrence alone. Conclusions 3DRT with concurrent chemotherapy achieves satisfactory treatment outcomes with tolerable toxicities for stage IV NSCLC. Primary tumor volume, change in the KPS score after treatment, and radiation dose are independent prognostic factors for OS.Clinical Trial Registry Chinese Clinical Reistry,registration number:ChiCTRC10001026.

A phase II study of oxaliplatin with 5-FU/folinic acid and concomitant radiotherapy as a preoperative treatment in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

Objective: To evaluate the activity and safety of adding oxaliplatin to a standard chemoradiotherapy schema, including 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/folinic acid (FA), in locally-advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Methods: Two cycles of oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 plus FA 20 mg/m2 bolus for 5 days and 5-FU 350 mg/m2 continuous infusion for 5 days were given during week 1 and 4 of pelvic radiotherapy 46 Gy. Patients with a T3/4 and/or node-positive rectal tumour were eligible. Surgery was performed 4–6 weeks after radiotherapy. The primary endpoint was to determine the rate of pathological response. Secondary endpoints were to assess the rate of clinical response and the safety profile. Results: Between March 2005 and January 2009, a total of 35 patients were enrolled. The pathological downstaging rate was 79% with a pathological complete response rate of 17%. The overall clinical response rate (assessed by computed tomography or transrectal ultrasound) was 77%. Grade 3 diarrhoea and Grade 3 neutropaenia were reported in 14% and 11% of the patients, respectively. Eleven patients did not undergo surgery: four of them refused the operation, and seven patients were inoperable due to disease progression. In 24 patients who had surgery, a sphincter-preserving procedure could be performed in 29%. At the median follow-up time of 28.1 months, 25 patients (71%) survived with no evidence of disease. Conclusion: The promising results in terms of pathological response, and the associated good safety profile of a regimen of oxaliplatin plus 5-FU/FA with concomitant radiotherapy, suggest that the regimen could be used in LARC.

Phase II Study of Gemcitabine and Vinorelbine as a Combination Chemotherapy for the Second-Line Treatment of Nonsmall Cell Lung Carcinoma / 결핵및호흡기질환

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths in Korea and the number of lung cancer deaths is increasing. The higher response rates, decreased toxicity and improved performance status of the first-line treatments have resulted in an increased number of patients becoming candidates for second-line therapy. Several new anti??neoplastic agents, including gemcitabine, docetaxel and paclitaxel, have recently demonstrated second-line activity. This phase II study evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine and vinorelbine as combination chemotherapy for Korean patients with NSCLC as a second-line treatment. METHODS: Sixty response-evaluable patients were enrolled from December 2000 to July 2003. We conducted a phase II study of a combination gemcitabine and vinorelbine chemotherapy for patients with histologically confirmed NSCLC that was stage IIIB and IV disease at the time of diagnosis, and the disease had progressed onward or the patients had relapsed after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. They were treated with intravenous gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 and intravenous vinorelbine 25mg/m2 on days 1 and 8. This chemotherapy regimen was repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 215 cycles of treatment were given and the mean number of cycles was 3.6 cycles. All the patients were evaluable for the toxicity profile. The response rate was 10% according to the WHO criteria.?The median progression free survival was 3.8 months and the median survival time was 10.1 months. The 1-year survival rate was 32.9%. Grade III and IV neutropenia were seen in 20 (33.3%) and 7 (11.7%) patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: The combination of gemcitabine and vinorelbine is active and well tolerated as a second-line therapy for patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma.

A Phase II Study of Genexol(R) (paclitaxel) in Metastatic Breast Cancer / Journal of the Korean Cancer Association, 대한암학회지

PURPOSE: Paclitaxel is a very effective agent in the treatment of breast cancer. Samyang Corporation has developed its own process to produce paclitaxel in a large volume using plant cell culture technology. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Genexol(R) in patients with metastatic breast cancer who have failed to respond to standard therapy, we performed a prospective, multi- center phase II clinical trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic breast cancer were included in this study. Enrollees were required to have histologically confirmed breast cancer with bidimensionally measurable metastatic disease. Genexol(R) was administered at 175 mg/m2 as a 3-hour intravenous infusion every 3 weeks. All patients were premedicated with hydrocortisone, pheniramine maleate, and H2 blocker 30 minutes prior to paclitaxel. We planned to administer at least 4 courses of paclitaxel unless there was disease progression or unacceptable toxicity and to continue treatment up to a total of 6 courses in cases of objective response following 4 courses. RESULTS: The median duration of follow-up was 8.9 (2.07~13.7) months. Forty-five patients were registered and 43 were eligible. The performance status of patients was ECOG 0~1 in 39 patients (90.7%) and 2 in 4 (9.3%). The location of metastases at the start of the study were the lung (15 patients), liver (8 patients), lymph nodes (22 patients), and other (7 patients). Among the 40 evaluable patients, 15 patients obtained partial responses (PRs) (37.5%, 95% CI: 22.5~52.5%). The median duration of response was 11.67 (4.1~11.7) months and the median time to progression was 7.73 (2.8~11.7) months. The median survival time was not reached at 13.7 months, and the overall survival rate at 13.7 months was 70.1%. The hematologic toxicity was primarily neutropenia with grade 3 or 4 in 10 patients (23.3%). The grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicities included alopecia (17, 39.5%), myalgia (2, 4.7%), neuropathy (2, 4.7%), and pruritus (1, 2.3%). Mild hypersensitivity reaction was observed in 2 patients, although it did not cause withdrawal of the test drug. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the Genexol injection is an effective anticancer formulation for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer and toxicity is acceptable.