Percepciones de los médicos en formación en Cirugía General en la fase inicial de la pandemia por COVID-19 / Perceptions of general surgeons in training in the initial phase of COVID-19 pandemic

RESUMEN Objetivo: describir las percepciones de los cirujanos en formación durante la fase inicial de la pandemia por COVID-19. Material y métodos: se realizó el análisis transversal de una encuesta de 51 preguntas a médicos en formación de un Servicio de Cirugía General en un hospital de la Argentina. Se abarcaron 5 ámbitos: institucional, asistencial, académico, doméstico y emocional. Resultados: en total 55 médicos completaron la encuesta (91,7%): 35 residentes y 20 becarios de perfeccionamiento; 56,4% eran hombres. El 98,1% consideró suficiente la información brindada por el hospital y el servicio sobre las medidas tomadas con respecto al COVID-19. Si bien el 98,1% consideró satisfactorios los instructivos sobre los equipos de protección personal, el 38% informó inconvenientes en su utilización. El 92,5% de los residentes estuvo de acuerdo con el esquema de guardias implementado. El 94,5% incrementó el tiempo dedicado a actividades académicas. El 75% consideró útil el cronograma de clases virtuales implementado. El 72,7% de los encuestados consideró que contaba con espacios donde manifestar sus preocupaciones. El 60% consideró adecuada la supervisión. El 81,81% manifestó preocupación por perder habilidad manual. El 53% dijo sentirse frustrado y el 54% manifestó temor de contagiar a su familia/pareja. Conclusión: conocer las percepciones de los cirujanos en formación en la fase inicial de la pandemia por COVID-19 permitió detectar oportunidades de mejora e incorporar nuevas estrategias educativas para afrontar las fases siguientes, asegurando el aprendizaje y priorizando su bienestar físico y psicosocial.

ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study is to describe the perceptions of surgeons in training during the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. Material and methods: A 51-question survey was conducted among physicians in training from a department of surgery in an Argentine hospital. Five domains were explored: institutional, healthcare, academic, domestic and emotional. Results: The survey was completed by 55 physicians (91.7%): 35 residents and 20 fellows. Among the respondents, 98.1% considered the information provided by the hospital and the department about the measures implemented in the COVID-19 stetting was sufficient. 98.1% considered that the instructions about personal protective equipment were satisfactory, but 38% reported difficulties to use them. 92.5% of the residents agreed with the system implemented for on-call shifts, 94.5% increased the time dedicated to academic activities, 75% considered the virtual class schedule implemented as very useful and 72.72% perceived that they had spaces to express their concerns. The supervision was considered adequate by 60%; 81.81% were worried to lose manual dexterity; 53% felt frustrated and 54% were afraid of infecting their family/partner. Conclusion: Understanding the perceptions of surgeons in training in the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic made it possible to detect opportunities for improvement and incorporate modifications to address the following phases, ensuring learning and prioritizing their physical and psychosocial well-being.

Assessing the impact of a physician resiliency and wellness program to physician burnout levels in a pediatric department of a tertiary hospital: A pilot study of the I-CARE program

@#<p><strong>Background:</strong> Physician burnout is a growing problem worldwide. Several interventions aimed at lowering burnout rates among physicians have been implemented. To date, there is no established structured program to combat burnout in the Philippine General Hospital. This study evaluated the effectiveness of the I-CARE program, a physician resilience and wellness program which adapted the different components of the international programs for the Philippine setting.</p><p><strong>Objective:</strong> To evaluate the effectiveness of the I-CARE program in reducing medical residents' burnout level.</p><p><strong>Methods:</strong> After key components of the I-CARE program were identified, the program was implemented in 2 phases. The first phase involved training of consultants to hone their facilitation skills. The second phase was a before-and-after study of the I-CARE program. The participants' burnout level was measured before and after the program using the Maslach Burnout Inventory.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> The I-CARE program was implemented in the Department of Pediatrics from March to August 2020. There was no significant change in the overall burnout levels of 59 pediatric residents after the I-CARE implementation (p=0.32). This may be due to several challenges encountered during the implementation, such as time constraints, the increased workload caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, and the lack of physical meetings due to the restrictions of the pandemic. However, the feedback of the administrators, facilitators and residents was generally positive. All the interviewed participants recommended the continuation of the I-CARE program in the Department of Pediatrics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> The I-CARE program shows potential in promoting mental health and emotional wellness among physicians in training.</p>