RESUMO
PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to compare the initial micromotion and stress shielding of a "fit and fill" stem to a "proximal fitting and distal tapered" stem in the early postoperative period using the load simulating single leg stance and stair climbing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the data from 3-D human CT scan, authors developed two types of 3-dimensional finite element total hip replacement model of proximal femur, which were inserted with a "fit and fill" stem and a "proximal fitting and distal tapered" stem. The constructions of stems were based on the OmnifitTM stem (about 13,000 element & 20,000 nodes). We compared micromotion, maximal principal stress and strain energy of each stems. RESULTS: The results indicate that micromotion in a fit and fill stem were slightly lower than that of a tapered stem, especially in stair climbing over that in the single leg stance. The maximum principal stress on the cortex of femur was slightly higher in a tapered stem in the case of single leg stance, and 2 times higher in the case of stair climbing. Strain energy also was much higher in a tapered stem in both single leg stance and stair climbing gait. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that a tapered stem design could provide more favorable biomechanical benefits rather than a fit & fill stem after cementless total hip replacement.