Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Rev. odontol. UNESP (Online) ; 51: e20220047, 2022. tab, ilus
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-1424238

RESUMO

Introduction: Primary stability is one of the goals of modern implant dentistry and if achieved, reduces treatment time for prosthetic rehabilitation and the number of interventions made in patients mouth. Several companies state as protocol for connical conection implants, a subcrestally positioning. Objective: This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the effect of placing a conical connection implant equicrestally and subcrestally on static and loading condition in two types of bone density. Material and method: A total of 200 bone cylinders were extracted from femur of pigs, standardized by means of x-rays and computerized microtomography scan (microCT) and separated in low and high density specimens. The implants were placed on the center of the bone cylinders and were evaluated before and after loading by means of microCT and histomorphometry. Result: The results showed that placing the evaluated implant subcrestally provided better primary stability and performance on static and loading situations on low and high density bone. Conclusion: Placing implant subcrestally improve primary stability outcomes under loading and static situations.


Introdução: A estabilidade primária é um dos objetivos da implantodontia moderna e, caso atingida, reduz o tempo de tratamento para a reabilitação protéticas e o número de intervenções realizadas. Diversas empresas preconizam a posição subcrestal no uso de implantes com conexão cônica interna. Objetivo: Este estudo in vitro avaliou o efeito do posicionamento de implantes de conexão conica interna sub e equicrestal sob condições estáticas e em função, considerando dois tipos de densidades ósseas. Material e método: um total de 200 espécimes de osso extraído do femur de suínos e padronizados por meio de radiografias e microtomografias computadorizadas foram separados em densidade alta e baixa. Implantes foram instalados no centro dos especimes e for a avaliados por meio de microCT e histomorfometria. Resultado: Os resultados demonstraram que a colocação de implante subcrestalmente promoveu melhor estabilidade primária e performance em todas as situações, irrespectivamente à densidade óssea. Conclusão: A colocação de implantes subcrestalmente melhora a estabilidade primária em todas as situações, sendo indicada quando da utilização de conexões cônicas internas.


Assuntos
Técnicas In Vitro , Densidade Óssea , Implantes Dentários , Microtomografia por Raio-X , Carga Imediata em Implante Dentário
2.
Braz. j. oral sci ; 9(4): 464-469, Oct.-Dec. 2010. ilus, tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS, BBO | ID: lil-582279

RESUMO

Aim: To test the hypothesis that bone quality may affect the stability of anchorage devices implanted in a rat model. Methods: Twenty male Wistar rats were divided into 2 groups: Group 1 (rats treated with FK506) and Group 2(rats treated with saline solution vehicle). The immunosuppressant tacrolimus was used with the intention of causing a condition of osteopenia in Group 1. A total of 20 orthodontic mini-implants were used. One mini-implant was inserted in the right femur of each rat. After sacrificing the animals, blocks of bone tissue containing the mini-implants were removed for mechanical pull-out tests to be performed in a universal test machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/s. The maximum insertion force values and pull-out test were recorded and submitted the nonparametric analyses including the Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney tests (p<0.05). The test for Pearson’s correlation was used to verify the correlation between bone mineral density and the pull-out test. The dose of FK506 was 2 mg/kg/day. Densitometric analysis was performed to observe the effect of FK506 on the bone mineral density. Results: The mean insertion force values were similar in both groups, with no statistically significant difference between them (P > 0.05). The mean pull-out force values were higher in Group 2 than in Group 1, with statistically significant difference between the groups (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Bone quality may affect the stability of mini-implants. Orthodontic mini-implants did not present good primary stability in a rat model with osteopenia.


Assuntos
Animais , Ratos , Densidade Óssea , Parafusos Ósseos , Miniaturização , Procedimentos de Ancoragem Ortodôntica/métodos , Fêmur/cirurgia , Implantes Experimentais , Modelos Animais
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA