Comparison between Conventional Radiography, Radiovisiography and Raypex 5 Electronic Apexlocator in Determining the Root Canal Length in Posterior Teeth- An Invitro Study

The determination of working length and its maintenance during cleaning and shaping procedures is a key factor for successful endodontic treatment. The aim of this in- vitro study was to evaluate the utility and accuracy of Raypex5 electronic apex locator in determining the working length in comparison to conventional radiography and radiovisiography in posterior teeth. Methods: In this study sixty extracted mandibular first and second molars were used. Diagnostic images were obtained both by conventional radiography and radiovisiography (RVG) and tentative working length was obtained and recorded. After access opening actual root canal length was determined by both conventional radiography and RVG and recorded. Four blinded observers determined the working length in all samples with Raypex5 electronic apex locator. Then at that length file position was checked using RVG. Results: All the data collected was statistically analyzed using one way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Cronbach’s alpha reability analysis and student paired t-test. Conclusion: In this study it was found that Electronic apexlocator Raypex 92 %, RVG 74% and conventional radiograph was 70% accurate in measuring root canal length in posterior teeth.

Effectiveness of three electronic apex locators to determine root canal working length / Efectividad de tres localizadores apicales electrónicos para determinar la longitud radicular de trabajo

This study was to evaluate in vivo the accuracy of three electronic apex locators (EALs) in determining working length (WL) using hand files and a wear technique. Thirty two premolars that were completely formed apically and that were scheduled for extraction for orthodontic reasons from patients between ages of 15 and 20 years old were included. Electronic measurement of WL was performed using the EAL according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The following three EAL were used: A. Root ZX II; B. Raypex 5, and C. Propex II. There were significant difference (p=0.0002) when comparing median differences among the three EAL. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences between Root ZX II vs. Raypex 5 and Root ZX II vs. Propex II (p=0.0044; p=0.0002), while between aypex 5 and Propex II, there were no statistically significant differences with respect to the accuracy of the EAL in determining WL (p=0.1087). The present findings suggest that Root ZX II presented the highest agreement rate for determining the final WL...

Estudio fue evaluar in vivo la exactitud de tres localizadores apicales electrónicos(LAEs) para determinar la longitud de trabajo (LT) usando instrumentos manuales y una técnica de desgaste. Treinta y dos premolares con formación apical completa e indicados para extracción por razones ortodóncicas de pacientes de edad entre 15 y 20 años fueron incluidos en el estudio. Seusaron tres LAE; A. Root ZX II; B. Raypex 5, y C. Propex II. Se encontraron diferencias significativas (p=0.0002) cuando se compararon las medianas entre los tres LAE. El análisismostró diferencias entre Root ZX II vs. Raypex 5 y Root ZX II vs. Propex II (p=0.0044; p=0,0002), mientras queentre Raypex 5 y Propex II, no se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en la determinación de la LT (p=0.1087). Los presentes hallazgos sugieren que Root ZX II mostró la mayor exactitud para determinar la LT final...

A clinical evaluation on accuracy of RayPex5 apex locator for measuring root canal working length / 实用口腔医学杂志

In order to evaluate the accuracy of RayPex5 apex locator in measuring root canal working length in clinical practice and to analyze the possible factor resulting in deviation, the working length of total 211 root canals were measured by handing method and electronic method respectively. The exact working length of those root canals were determined by X-ray method. The accuracy rate of electronic method and handing method was 96.21% and 78.2% respectively, with significant difference(P<0.001). The accuracy rate of front teeth group and molar group measured by electronic method was 100% and 92.5% respectively, with significant difference(P<0.05), while the apical paradentitis group and the apical non-paradentitis group, the front teeth group and the premolar group, and the premolar group and the molar group didn' t differ from each other, respectively. The study showed that the accuracy rate of electronic method was high for determining root canal working length, and Raypex 5 apex locator could define apical seat to measure root canal working length accurately.