Normative values and its clinical significance of the anorectal manometry in Chinese from multi-center study / 中华消化杂志

Objective To acquire normative values of anorectal manometry and sensation in population of our country with different gender and age.Methods Healthy individuals from four medical centers were collected and divided into three group according to their age,group Ⅰ 18 - 39 years old, group Ⅱ 40-59 years old and group Ⅲ ≥60 years old.The parameters of anal of subjects at resting status was examined by pneumohydraulic capillary perfusion system and high resolution PC Polygraf HR desktop gastrointestinal dynamic monitoring system.Subjects were asked to simulate defecation and then the defecation related indexes were recorded.In the end rectoanal inhibitory reflexes (RAIR)and rectal sensation were assessed by aired balloon.One-way analysis of variance and independent sample test were performed to compare indexes among three groups with different age and between different genders. Results A total of 166 healthy subjects were enrolled,79 in group Ⅰ with 40 male,68 in group Ⅱ with 29 male and 19 in group Ⅲ with 11 male.There was no significant difference in anal sphincter length (ASL),valid anal sphincter length (VASL),resting anal sphincter pressure (RASP),squeeze anal sphincter pressure (SASP)and duration of valid squeeze anal sphincter pressure (VSASP)among three groups with different age (all P > 0.05 ).Compared between male and female,only SASP of male ((180.13±8.10)mmHg,1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)was significantly higher than that of female ((143.93± 6.59)mmHg,t = -3.489,P 0.05 ). There was no significant difference in rectal pressure (RP),rectoanal pressure gradient (RAPG),anal sphincter relaxation rate (ASRR),and rectoanal coordination (RAC)among three groups (all P >0.05). During simulated defecation,RP and RAPG of men ((61 .23±3.46)mmHg and (40.04±4.08)mmHg) were significantly higher than those of women ((44.47 ± 2.32)mmHg and (24.00 ± 2.59 )mmHg, t=-4.075 ,-3.367,both P 0.05).All participants had RAIR,and there was no significant difference neither among three groups nor between men and women (both P >0.05).There was no significant difference in first rectal sensation (FRS)and constant rectal sensation (CRS)among three groups with different age (all P >0.05).However,the maximum rectal tolerable sensation (MRTS)of group Ⅱ and group Ⅲ was significantly higher than that of group Ⅰ ((194.41 ±6.32)mL and (200.00±12.75)mL vs (167.80 ± 5 .00)mL,F = 6.698,P = 0.002).There was no significant difference in rectal sensation between different gender (all P >0.05 ).Conclusions In our country,SASP,RP and RAPG during simulated defecation of male are higher than those of female.The value of MRTS increases along with the age.

Effect of Electrical Stimulation and Biofeedback Therapy for Constipated Patients with Impaired Rectal Sensation

PURPOSE: Biofeedback therapy is widely used for the management of constipation associated with pelvic outlet obstruction. Some patients have shown poor outcome after biofeedback alone. A subgroup of patients complains of absence of desire to defecate. The main pathophysiology of constipation may be impaired rectal sensation or compliance. This study evaluated the effect of electrical stimulation and biofeedback therapy (EST-BF) for this subgroup of constipated patients with impaired rectal sensation. METHODS: Of the 37 patients diagnosed with pelvic outlet obstruction by using cinedefecography, 9 patients (M:F=2:7, age=22~77 years, median=57 years) who had impaired rectal sensation (rectal desire threshold > or =100 ml) on anorectal manometry were selected. These patients were treated with EST-BF therapy 2~6 (median: 5) sessions, Kontinece, Multichannel system, HMT, Inc, Seoul, Korea). Treatment consisted of 20 minutes of variant-mode electrical stimulation and 20 minutes of EMG biofeedback therapy per week administered by a specialized colorectal surgeon. All patients were evaluated by using a standardized questionnaire and a threshold for rectal sensation based on balloon distention before and after treatment. RESULTS: At post EST-BF, six (67%) patients had experienced an improvement in symptoms, including five (56%) patients with complete symptom relief. Significant improvement in rectal sensation, especially the rectal defecation desire threshold (pre-EST-BF vs. post- EST-BF: 181.0+/-38.7 vs. 88.3+/-29.1) was achieved. CONCLUSIONS: EST- BF may be an effective option for use in the treatment of functional constipation with impaired rectal sensation.

Electrical Stimulation Effect in Constipated Patients with Impaired Rectal Sensation / 대한소화관운동학회지

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Among constipated patients, there is a subgroup of patients who complain about an absent or diminished sense of desire to defecate, suggesting that one of the causes of functional constipation may be impaired rectal sensation. Recently, electrical stimulation therapy (EST) has been used for the treatment of patients with urinary/fecal incontinence. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of EST for a subgroup of constipated patients with impaired rectal sensation. METHODS: Of the 130 patients with functional constipation as defined by Rome II criteria, 22 patients who had impaired rectal sensation (rectal desire threshold volume = 90 ml) were selected. Twelve patients were treated with EST and 10 patients with biofeedback therapy (BFT). RESULTS: The overall symptoms of the patients significantly improved after therapy in both groups (p<0.05). Interestingly, the sense of desire to defecate improved only after EST (p<0.05). Moreover, there was significant improvement in anal residual pressure after BFT solely (p<0.05). On the other hand, rectal sensory threshold volumes improved significantly after EST exclusively (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study has revealed that the efficacy of EST can be comparable to BFT in a subgroup of constipated patients, especially with impaired rectal sensation. EST could be considered an adjunctive therapeutic modality for the management of functional constipation with impaired rectal sensation.

Electrical Stimulation Effect in Constipated Patients with Impaired Rectal Sensation / 대한소화관운동학회지

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Among constipated patients, there is a subgroup of patients who complain about an absent or diminished sense of desire to defecate, suggesting that one of the causes of functional constipation may be impaired rectal sensation. Recently, electrical stimulation therapy (EST) has been used for the treatment of patients with urinary/fecal incontinence. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of EST for a subgroup of constipated patients with impaired rectal sensation. METHODS: Of the 130 patients with functional constipation as defined by Rome II criteria, 22 patients who had impaired rectal sensation (rectal desire threshold volume = 90 ml) were selected. Twelve patients were treated with EST and 10 patients with biofeedback therapy (BFT). RESULTS: The overall symptoms of the patients significantly improved after therapy in both groups (p<0.05). Interestingly, the sense of desire to defecate improved only after EST (p<0.05). Moreover, there was significant improvement in anal residual pressure after BFT solely (p<0.05). On the other hand, rectal sensory threshold volumes improved significantly after EST exclusively (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study has revealed that the efficacy of EST can be comparable to BFT in a subgroup of constipated patients, especially with impaired rectal sensation. EST could be considered an adjunctive therapeutic modality for the management of functional constipation with impaired rectal sensation.

The changes of anorectal motility and rectal sensation in patients with constipation-predominant and diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome / 中国实用内科杂志

0.05).When abdominal pressure was increased,the net increased pressure of anal sphincter in DIBS was lower than that in HS (P

A Case of Constipation with Decreased Rectal Sensation Improved by Electrical Stimulation Therapy Alone / 대한소화관운동학회지

Patients with intractable constipation often complain of social, physical and psychological stress. Recently, biofeedback therapy is widely used in the management of intractable constipation and improve the defecation act, particularly in cases of constipation associated with pelvic floor dyssynergia. However, some of constipated patients show only decreased rectal sensation and increased rectal compliance on the anorectal function tests. It is unclear whether the decreased rectal sensation is a cause or outcome of constipation and not known how to treat such cases. We recently experienced a 25-year-old female patient who complained of constipation. She had intractable constipation, which made her attempt a suicide. Colon transit time study and defecogram showed nonspecific findings. Her anorectal manometric findings were within normal ranges except rectal sensation and compliance. Rectal volume for desire and urge to defecate, and maximal tolerable volume were markedly increased and compliance was impossible to measure. She was treated by electrical stimulation therapy. After electrical stimulation therapy, her constipation symptoms improved dramatically. Furthermore, the desire and urge volume were decreased and the compliance became calculated. We report this constipation case with decreased rectal sensation and increased rectal compliance possibly treated by electrical stimulation therapy.