Conhecimentos dos estudantes de pós-graduação em enfermagem sobre má conduta em pesquisa / Knowledge of nursing postgraduate students about misconduct in research / Conocimiento de estudiantes de postgrado en enfermería sobre la mala conducta en la investigación

Objetivo: analisar os conhecimentos dos estudantes de pós-graduação em enfermagem sobre má conduta em pesquisa. Método: estudo qualitativo, descritivo e exploratório, norteado pelos critérios do Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research: a synthesis of recommendations, realizada com 40 estudantes de mestrado e doutorado, de uma universidade pública situada no Sul do Brasil. Os dados foram coletados por intermédio de entrevistas semiestruturadas, em outubro de 2020, com a utilização de aplicativo síncrono, os quais foram submetidos à análise textual discursiva. O protocolo de pesquisa foi aprovado pelo Comitê de Ética em Pesquisa. Resultados: emergiram duas categorias: Integridade científica versus má conduta: fatores determinantes e Tipos e definições de má conduta. Conclusão: Os pós-graduandos possuem conhecimento coeso relacionado à gravidade dos comportamentos inadequados nas pesquisas científicas, bem como as consequências nocivas advindas dessa conduta, contemplando um domínio abstrato quando relacionado às questões de moralidade e integridade e sua absoluta inversão.

Objective: to examine postgraduate nursing students' knowledge of research misconduct. Method: this exploratory, qualitative, descriptive study, guided by the criteria of the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research: a synthesis of recommendations, considered 40 master's and doctoral students at a public university in southern Brazil. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, in October 2020, using a synchronous application, and treated by textual discourse analysis. The study was approved by the research ethics committee. Results: two categories emerged: "Scientific integrity versus misconduct: determining factors" and "Types and definitions of misconduct". Conclusion: postgraduate students have cohesive knowledge of the severity of inappropriate behavior in scientific research and of the harmful consequences of such conduct, contemplating an abstract domain when related to questions of morality and integrity and their absolute inversion.

Objetivo: analizar el conocimiento de los estudiantes de postgrado en enfermería sobre la mala conducta en investigación. Método: investigación cualitativa, descriptiva y exploratoria, guiada por los criterios de los Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research: a synthesis of recommendations, realizada junto a 40 estudiantes de máster y doctorado de una universidad pública ubicada en el sur de Brasil. Los datos fueron recolectados a través de entrevistas semiestructuradas, en octubre de 2020, utilizando una aplicación síncrona, y después sometidos a análisis textual discursivo. El Comité de Ética en Investigación aprobó el protocolo de investigación. Resultados: surgieron dos categorías: Integridad científica versus mala conducta: factores determinantes y Tipos y definiciones de mala conducta. Conclusión: Los estudiantes de postgrado tienen conocimientos cohesionados con respecto a la gravedad de las conductas inadecuadas en la investigación científica, así como las consecuencias nocivas derivadas de esas conductas, contemplando un dominio abstracto cuando relacionado con cuestiones de moralidad e integridad y su inversión absoluta.

Trayectorias del pensamiento crítico social y ambiental en la investigación. Caso Maestría de Desarrollo Sostenible y Medio Ambiente / Trajectories of critical social and environmental thinking from the investigation. Master's case of Sustainable Development and Environment / Trajetórias de pensamento social e ambiental crítico na pesquisa. Caso do Mestrado em Desenvolvimento Sustentável e Meio Ambiente

RESUMEN Se presentan los resultados del estudio documental que tuvo como objetivo interpretar las trayectorias del pensamiento crítico social y ambiental en las tesis de la Maestría en Desarrollo Sostenible y Medio Ambiente de la Universidad de Manizales. La metodología utilizada fue cualitativa con alcance interpretativo, para lo cual se empleó la revisión sistemática de literatura y el análisis categorial como recursos metodológicos; las fases de la investigación fueron la exploración y el análisis documental de 76 tesis desarrolladas entre 2007 y 2018, con una organización en dos categorías: la racionalidad social y la racionalidad ambiental. Respecto a la racionalidad social se encontró un enfoque del desarrollo humano a partir de la postura de los investigadores para el examen crítico de sí mismo y de las propias tradiciones, la habilidad para un pensamiento desde la diversidad y la pluralidad y la necesidad de entender los sufrimientos ajenos. Y en la racionalidad ambiental, los investigadores demuestran su postura en torno a la racionalidad sustantiva, teórica, técnica y cultural para identificar y reducir las problemáticas ambientales. Se idéntico la línea del pensamiento lógico disciplinar para posteriores estudios.

ABSTRACT The results of the documentary study that aimed to interpret the trajectories of critical social and environmental thought in the theses of the Master's Degree in Sustainable Development and Environment at the University of Manizales are presented. The methodology used was qualitative with an interpretative scope, for which the systematic literature review and categorical analysis were used as methodological resources; the phases of the research were the exploration and documentary analysis of 76 theses developed between 2007 to 2018; with an organization in two categories: social rationality and environmental rationality. Regarding social rationality, an approach to human development was found from the position of researchers for the critical examination of themselves and their own traditions, the ability to think from diversity and plurality and the need to understand the sufferings of others. And in environmental rationality, researchers show their position around substantive, theoretical, technical and cultural rationality to identify and reduce environmental problems. The line of disciplinary logical thought was identical for later studies.

RESUMO Apresentamos os resultados do estudo documental que visou interpretar as trajetórias do pensamento crítico social e ambiental nas teses do Mestrado em Desenvolvimento Sustentável e Meio Ambiente da Universidade de Manizales. A metodologia utilizada foi qualitativa com escopo interpretativo, para a qual a revisão sistemática da literatura e a análise categórica foram utilizadas como recursos metodológicos; as fases da pesquisa foram a exploração e análise documental de 76 teses desenvolvidas entre 2007 e 2018, com uma organização em duas categorias: racionalidade social e racionalidade ambiental. Com relação à racionalidade social, encontramos uma abordagem do desenvolvimento humano baseada na postura dos pesquisadores para o exame crítico de si mesmos e de suas próprias tradições, a capacidade de pensar a partir da diversidade e pluralidade e a necessidade de compreender o sofrimento dos outros. E na racionalidade ambiental, os pesquisadores demonstram sua posição sobre a racionalidade substantiva, teórica, técnica e cultural para identificar e reduzir as questões ambientais. A linha de pensamento lógico disciplinar é identificada para estudos futuros.

Publication Rates for Abstracts Presented by Korean Investigators at Major Radiology Meetings

OBJECTIVE: To determine the publication rate of abstracts presented by Korean investigators at national and international radiological meetings, and to identify predictive factors of publication. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Abstracts presented at the annual meetings of the Korean Radiological Society (KRS), and abstracts presented by Korean investigators at the annual meetings of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) and European Congress of Radiology (ECR) from 2001 to 2002 were searched for subsequent publication, using PubMed and the Korean Medical Database. The following variables were evaluated. 1) The overall publication rate; 2) the publication rates according to the radiological subspecialty, presentation type (oral or poster), sample size ( 50), study design (prospective or retrospective), statistical analysis (present or absent), and study outcome (positive or negative); 3) the time to publication; 4) the journal where the study was published; 5) consistency between the abstract and the final publication. RESULTS: Of 1,097 abstracts, 301 (27.4%) were subsequently published, at an average of 15.8 +/- 13.8 months after presentation in 48 journals. The publication rates for studies presented at the RSNA (35.4%) and ECR (50.5%) conferences were significantly higher than that for the KRS conference (23.6%, p < 0.05). Vascular/interventional radiology studies had the highest publication rate (33.1%), whereas musculoskeletal radiology studies had the lowest publication rate (17.1%). Other factors associated with subsequent publication were prospective design, use of statistical testing, and a positive study outcome. CONCLUSION: The publication rate is significantly lower for the KRS (23.6%) meeting abstracts as compared to those of the RSNA (35.4%) and ECR (50.5%). Prospective design, use of statistical testing, and positive study outcome have a statistically significant effect on the publication rate.

Scientific writing and publishing: its importance to radiologists

Scientific writing and publication marks the endpoint of research that has been performed, completed, peer reviewed and accepted, and complements teaching and training, clinical service and patient care. Writing has numerous benefits, one of the most important ones being the inherent training undertaken to better appreciate and evaluate the published work of others. Effective scientific writing is an important component of a radiologist’s practice, and should be cultivated at an early stage of the career.