The effect of local anesthetic solution volume applied in retrobulbar block in cataract surgery on the duration of anesthesia and patient comfort / Efeito do volume da solução anestésica local aplicada no bloqueio retrobulbar na cirurgia de catarata na duração da anestesia e no conforto do paciente

Abstract Objective: To compare the use of 2 different local anesthetic solution (LAS) volumes of 1.5 mL and 3 mL in retrobulbar block in patients undergoing cataract surgery in terms of anesthesia, akinesia, and pain levels. Methods: 80 patients between 18-90 years old, ASA I-II-III, were included in the study. For retrobulbar anesthesia, 1.5 mL LAS was applied to one group (Group LV), and 3 mL LAS to the other group (Group HV). The patients' ocular and eyelid motion scores were evaluated and recorded in the first, third, fifth, and tenth minutes after the block, and at 30-minute intervals for 4 hours post-operatively. One day later, the first hour of analgesic need and the number of times they took analgesic agents were asked and recorded. In addition, side effects were questioned and recorded. Results: The 39 (48.75%) patients were male and 41 (51.25%) patients were female. The criteria determined in terms of ocular motor score after the retrobulbar block (ocular motor score≤4) were met in 92.5% of patients in Group LV in all patients in Group HV, and the time to fulfill the determined criteria in Group HV was found to be significantly lower compared to Group LV (p=0.004). The movements of the eye in all direction except the inward movement recovered in Group LV in a significantly shorter time than Group HV (p=0.004). There was no significant difference in pain levels and side effects between the groups (p=0.34). Conclusions: After 1.5 mL LAS administration in retrobulbar block, adequate akinesia was not achieved in about one tenth of patients, but no significant difference was found between 1.5 mL and 3 mL LAS volumes in analgesic efficacy and side effects.

Resumo Objetivo: Comparar o uso de 2 volumes diferentes de solução anestésica local (LAS) de 1,5 mL e 3 mL no bloqueio retrobulbar em pacientes submetidos à cirurgia de catarata em termos de anestesia, acinesia e níveis de dor. Métodos: 80 pacientes entre 18 e 90 anos, ASA I-II-III, foram incluídos no estudo. Para anestesia retrobulbar, 1,5 mL de LAS foi aplicado em um grupo (Grupo LV) e 3 mL de LAS no outro grupo (Grupo HV). Os escores de movimento ocular e palpebral dos pacientes foram avaliados e registrados no primeiro, terceiro, quinto e décimo minutos após o bloqueio e em intervalos de 30 minutos por 4 horas no pós-operatório. Um dia depois, a primeira hora de necessidade de analgésico e o número de vezes que eles tomaram analgésicos foram solicitados e registrados. Além disso, os efeitos colaterais foram questionados e registrados. Resultados: 39 (48,75%) pacientes eram do sexo masculino e 41 (51,25%) do sexo feminino. Os critérios determinados em termos de escore motor ocular após o bloqueio retrobulbar (escore motor ocular≤4) foram atendidos em 92,5% dos pacientes do Grupo LV em todos os pacientes do Grupo HV, e foi encontrado o tempo para atender aos critérios determinados no Grupo HV ser significativamente menor em comparação ao grupo LV (p = 0,004). Os movimentos do olho em todas as direções, exceto o movimento interior, se recuperaram no Grupo LV em um tempo significativamente menor que o Grupo HV (p = 0,004). Não houve diferença significativa nos níveis de dor e efeitos colaterais entre os grupos (p = 0,34). Conclusões: Após administração de 1,5 mL de LAS no bloqueio retrobulbar, não foi alcançada acinesia adequada em cerca de um décimo dos pacientes, mas não foi encontrada diferença significativa entre os volumes de 1,5 mL e 3 mL de LAS na eficácia analgésica e efeitos colaterais.

Amaurosis and contralateral cranial nerve pairs III and VI paralysis after peribulbar block - Case report / Amaurose e paralisia do III e do VI pares cranianos contralaterais após bloqueio peribulbar - relato de caso

Abstract Background and objectives: Peribulbar anesthesia has emerged as a safer option compared with intraconal retrobulbar block. Still, peribulbar anesthesia may not be considered without risk. Numerous complications have been described when performing this technique. This report aims to describe a rare case of amaurosis and contralateral paralysis while attempting to perform a peribulbar anesthesia. Case report: Male patient, 75-year old, physical status ASA II, undergoing cataract surgery by phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation. Sedated with fentanyl and midazolam and subjected to peribulbar anesthesia. There were no complications during surgery. After finishing the procedure, the patient reported lack of vision in the contralateral eye. Akinesia of the muscles innervated by the cranial nerve pairs III and VI, ptosis, and medium-sized pupils unresponsive to light stimulus were observed. Four hours after anesthesia, complete recovery of vision and eyelid and eyeball movements was seen in the non-operated eye. Conclusions: During peribulbar anesthesia, structures located in the intraconal space can be accidentally hit leading to complications such as described in the above report. Following the technical guidelines and using appropriate size needles may reduce the risk of such complication, but not completely.

Resumo Justificativa e objetivos: A anestesia peribulbar surgiu como uma opção mais segura quando comparada com o bloqueio retrobulbar intraconal. Ainda assim, a anestesia peribulbar não pode ser considerada isenta de riscos. Inúmeras complicações foram descritas quando da aplicação dessa técnica. O presente relato tem como objetivo descrever um caso raro caracterizado por amaurose e paralisia contralaterais quando da tentativa de se fazer a anestesia peribulbar. Relato de caso: Paciente masculino, 75 anos, estado físico ASA II, submetido à facectomia por facoemulsificação com implante de lente intraocular. Sedado com fentanil e midazolam e submetido a APB. Não houve intercorrências durante a cirurgia. Após o término do procedimento o paciente relatou ausência de visão no olho contralateral. Foram observadas acinesia da musculatura inervada pelo III e VI pares cranianos, ptose palpebral e pupilas de tamanho médio, não responsivas ao estímulo luminoso. Após quatro horas da anestesia, houve recuperação completa da visão, da movimentação das pálpebras e do globo ocular não operado. Conclusões: Durante a APB, estruturas localizadas no espaço intraconal podem ser atingidas acidentalmente levando a complicações como a descrita no relato acima. O respeito às diretrizes técnicas e o uso de agulhas com o tamanho adequado podem reduzir o risco de tal complicação, mas não de forma completa.

Effects of dexmedetomidine for retrobulbar anesthesia in orbital ball implants after enucleation surgery.

Background: Dexmedetomidine (DEX) can prolong the duration of local anesthetics, but the use of retrobulbar DEX has not been fully elucidated. This study was designed to determine the effects of adding DEX to lidocaine‑bupivacaine for retrobulbar block in orbital ball implants after enucleation surgery. Materials and Methods: A total of 200 patients of both sexes aged 30–60 years of American Society of Anesthesiologists I and II, scheduled for orbital ball implants after enucleation surgery, were enrolled for the study. Patients were randomly assigned into one of the two groups: Control (n = 100) received lidocaine‑bupivacaine retrobulbar block, DEX (n = 100) received lidocaine‑bupivacaine plus 1 ug/kg DEX retrobulbar block. Hemodynamic data, duration of motor and sensory blocks, pain by visual analog scale, bispectral index (BIS), side effects, consumption of dezocine as a rescue analgesic, patient and surgeon satisfaction were recorded. Results: Duration of analgesia was prolonged in the DEX, compared with the control group ([258.35 ± 66.82 min] as [130.75 ± 29.52 min], [P < 0.05]). The median number of postoperative analgesic requests per patient during the first 24 h was decreased in the DEX group (P < 0.05). In the first 24 postoperative hours, DEX group consumed significantly less dezocine (P < 0.05). BIS values and mean arterial pressure remained lower in the DEX group, but within the safe range (P < 0.05). The side effect profile was similar between the two groups. Patients and surgeon satisfaction were higher in the DEX group (P < 0.05). Demographic characteristics were comparable in both groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Retrobulbar DEX reduces consumption of rescue analgesic, prolonged the duration of retrobulbar block, improved postoperative pain, provided better sedation effects, and increased patient and surgeon satisfaction after orbital ball implants after enucleation surgery.

The Effect of Remifentanil, Alfentanil, and Fentanyl on the Hemodynamic Changes, Analgesia, and Sedation during Retrobulbar Block in Cataract Surgery / 대한마취과학회지

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to compare the effects of remifentanil, alfentanil, and fentanyl on the hemodynamic changes, sedation, and analgesia when administered with small doses of midazolam in patients undergoing a retrobulbar block for cataract surgery. METHODS: Sixty patients scheduled for cataract surgery were divided into 4 groups (n = 15 for each group). Firstly, group C received 5 ml of a normal saline solution, 3 min before a retrobulbar block. Next, group R received remifentanil 0.3g/kg. Furthermore, group A received a 4.5g/kg dose of alfentanil, 90 s before a retrobulbar block, and group F received fentanyl 0.6g/kg, 210 s before a retrobulbar block. All solutions were mixed with normal saline to a 5 ml volume. In group R, A, and F, midazolam (0.5 mg for patients over the age of 65 years; 1.0 mg in patients under the age of 65 years) was injected 3 min before the retrobulbar block. RESULTS: The systolic blood pressure in patients significantly increased at 1 or 2 minutes after a retrobulbar block in group C and at 1 minute in group F. For group R, the systolic blood pressure decreased significantly at 3, 4, 5, and 10 minutes, and at 2, 3, 4, 5, and 10 minute in group A. The mean OAA/S scale during a retrobulbar block significantly declined in groups R and A. The VAS score for pain was significantly lower in groups R and A, whereas the VAS anxiety index was significantly lower in groups R, A, F compared to group C (P 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We found that the combination of remifentanil or alfentanil with midazolam showed better hemodynamic stability, sedative, and analgesic effects compared to fentanyl with midazolam in the retrobulbar block for cataract surgery.

Comparison of Midazolam-Ketamine with Midazolam for Sedation during Retrobulbar Block in Cataract Surgery / 대한마취과학회지

BACKGROUND: Many ophthalmic procedures can be performed using a retrobulbar regional anesthetic technique. However, retrobulbar block is painful and most of patients express anxiety about the procedure. In addition, several life-threatening complications may occur. We compared the effects of midazolam and midazolam-ketamine as a sedative during retrobulbar block in cataract surgery. METHODS: Thirty patients undergoing cataract surgery were randomly allocated into two groups, group I (n=15) was received midazolam and group II (n=15), midazolam-ketamine. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) were compared before administration of drugs and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 20, and 30 min after administration of drugs. Patients' movement requiring restraint were also checked. In the recovery room, postoperative nausea and vomiting, recall, delirium and/or hallucinations, and ocular complications were recorded. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in MAP and SpO2 between groups but heart rates were significantly increased at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 min than baseline in group II. Movement score was significantly lower in Group II than in Group I during the block (p<0.05). Recall during performance of the nerve block occured more often in Group I than in Group II (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Low-dose midazolam-ketamine sedation sequence was superior to a midazolam technique regarding patients' movement and recall.

Combination of Low Dose Intravenous Sufentanil and Midazolam for Pretreatment of Retrobulbar Block in Outpatient Cataract Surgery / 대한마취과학회지

Midazolam, rather than diazepam does provide relatively more rapid recovery and more effective amnesia when used to supplement regional anesthesia for ambulatory case. In this study, low dose sufentanil, relatively new synthetic narcotic was administered supplementarily to potentiate the other agent. In human volunteers, depression of respiratory center sensitivity to carbon dioxide from sufentanil is of shorter duration than equipotent doses of fentanyl. Sufentanil has a potency about ten times that of fentanyl, and its duration of action is about one half as long. Concomitant use of low dose of sufentanil and midazolam intravenously for the pretreatment for retrobulbar block in outpatient cataract surgery produced satisfactory analgesia, anxiolysis, sedation, anterograde amnesia and hypnotic effects while preserving the maximal hemodynamic stability with minimal respiratory suppression and rapid recovery in a serverely compromised senile patient population.

Combination of Low Dose Intravenous Sufentanil and Midazolam for Pretreatment of Retrobulbar Block in Outpatient Cataract Surgery / 대한마취과학회지

Midazolam, rather than diazepam does provide relatively more rapid recovery and more effective amnesia when used to supplement regional anesthesia for ambulatory case. In this study, low dose sufentanil, relatively new synthetic narcotic was administered supplementarily to potentiate the other agent. In human volunteers, depression of respiratory center sensitivity to carbon dioxide from sufentanil is of shorter duration than equipotent doses of fentanyl. Sufentanil has a potency about ten times that of fentanyl, and its duration of action is about one half as long. Concomitant use of low dose of sufentanil and midazolam intravenously for the pretreatment for retrobulbar block in outpatient cataract surgery produced satisfactory analgesia, anxiolysis, sedation, anterograde amnesia and hypnotic effects while preserving the maximal hemodynamic stability with minimal respiratory suppression and rapid recovery in a serverely compromised senile patient population.