Anestesia espinal con morfina y bupivacaína en la cirugía de próstata / Spinal anesthesia with morphine and bupivacaine in prostate surgery

Introducción: El dolor posoperatorio constituye la principal causa de dolor agudo en el mundo. Brindar analgesia adecuada en el posquirúrgico garantiza la disminución de la estadía hospitalaria y tiene un impacto positivo en el resultado final de las intervenciones. Objetivo: Evaluar la efectividad de la analgesia posoperatoria con bupivacaína más morfina intratecal en la cirugía de próstata. Métodos: Se realizó una investigación cuasiexperimental, entre enero de 2015 y enero de 2018. La muestra quedó conformada de manera no probabilística por los pacientes que dieron su consentimiento informado y reunieron criterios para entrar en el estudio. Quedaron distribuidos de manera aleatoria en dos grupos denominados bupivacaína (B) y morfina-bupivacaína (MB). Para recolectar la información se emplearon las historias clínicas anestésicas y un formulario elaborado al efecto. Los resultados se mostraron en tablas y gráficos, se expresaron en frecuencias absolutas y en porcientos, se determinaron algunas medidas descriptivas de interés que mostraron el comportamiento de las variables que lo requirieron. Resultados: El resultado más relevante fue el efecto analgésico muy significativo en el grupo MB en las primeras 24 h del posoperatorio. La reacción adversa más frecuente fue el prurito y solo se presentó en el grupo que recibió morfina. Conclusiones: La anestesia espinal con morfina y bupivacaína es efectiva y segura, proporcionando mejor analgesia en el posoperatorio inmediato cuando se compara con bupivacaína sola(AU)

Introduction: Postoperative pain is the main cause of acute pain worldwide. Providing suitable analgesia in the postoperative period guarantees the reduction of hospital stay and has a positive impact on the final outcome of the interventions. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of postoperative analgesia with intrathecal administration of bupivacaine plus morphine in prostate surgery. Methods: A quasiexperimental research was carried out between January 2015 and January 2018. The sample was nonprobabilistic and made up by the patients who gave their informed consent and met criteria to enter the study. They were randomly distributed into two groups called bupivacaine (B) and morphine-bupivacaine (MB). To collect the information, the anesthetic medical records and a form prepared for this purpose were used. The results were shown in tables and graphs, expressed in absolute frequencies and percentages, some descriptive measures of interest were determined which showed the behavior of the variables that required it. Results: The most relevant result was the very significant analgesic effect in the MB group in the first 24 hours after surgery. The most frequent adverse reaction was pruritus and only occurred in the group that received morphine. Conclusions: Spinal anesthesia with morphine and bupivacaine is effective and safe, providing better analgesia in the immediate postoperative period when compared with bupivacaine alone(AU)

Efectividad de la anestesia espinal con morfina y bupivacaína en la cirugía de próstata / Effectiveness of spinal anesthesia with morphine and bupivacaine in prostate surgery

Introducción: El dolor posoperatorio constituye la principal causa de dolor agudo en el mundo. Brindar analgesia adecuada en el posquirúrgico garantiza la disminución del tiempo de estancia hospitalaria y tiene un impacto positivo en el resultado final de los pacientes. Objetivo: Evaluar la calidad de la analgesia posoperatoria con bupivacaína más morfina intratecal en la cirugía electiva de próstata, así como la incidencia de efectos adversos. Métodos: Se realizó una investigación cuasiexperimental, entre enero de 2014 y julio de 2017. La muestra quedó conformada de manera no probabilística por los pacientes que dieron su consentimiento informado y reunieron criterios para entrar en el estudio. Quedaron distribuidos de manera aleatoria en dos grupos denominados bupivacaína (B) y morfina-bupivacaína (MB). Para recolectar la información se emplearon las historias clínicas anestésicas y un formulario elaborado al efecto. Los datos se mostraron en tablas y gráficos, los resultados se expresaron numéricamente y en porcientos, se determinaron algunas medidas descriptivas de interés que mostraron el comportamiento de las variables que lo requirieron. Resultados: El resultado más relevante fue el efecto analgésico muy significativo en el grupo MB en las primeras 24 h del posoperatorio. La reacción adversa más frecuente fue el prurito y solo se presentó en el grupo que recibió morfina. Conclusiones: La anestesia espinal con morfina y bupivacaína es efectiva y segura, proporcionando mejor analgesia en el posoperatorio inmediato cuando se compara con bupivacaína sola(AU)

Introduction: Postoperative pain is the main cause of acute pain worldwide. Providing adequate analgesia postoperatively guarantees hospital stay reduction and positively affects patient outcome. Objective: To evaluate the quality of postoperative analgesia with bupivacaine plus intrathecal morphine in elective prostate surgery, as well as the incidence of adverse effects. Methods: A quasiexperimental research was carried out between January 2014 and July 2017. The sample was chosen in a non-probabilistic way and made up by the patients who gave their informed consent and met the inclusion criteria to enter the study. They were randomly distributed into two groups identified as bupivacaine (B) and morphine-bupivacaine (MB). To collect the information, the anesthetic medical records were used, together with a form prepared for such purpose. The data were shown in charts and graphs, the results were expressed numerically and in percentages, some descriptive measures of interest were determined that showed the behavior of the variables that required it. Results: The most relevant outcome was the very significant analgesic effect in the MB group in the first 24 hours after surgery. The most common adverse reaction was pruritus and only occurred in the group that received morphine. Conclusions: Spinal anesthesia with morphine and bupivacaine is effective and safe because it provides better analgesia in the immediate postoperative period in comparison to bupivacaine alone(AU)

Radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer with pelvic lymph node metastasis / 中华男科学杂志

Objective@#To investigate the safety and effectiveness of radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) with adjuvant androgen deprivation or external radiotherapy in the treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) with pelvic lymph node metastasis (PLNM).@*METHODS@#Twenty PCa patients underwent bilateral pedal lymphangiography (PLG) preoperatively, and 11 of them received lymph node aspiration for examination of the mRNA expressions of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) in the lymph fluid by real-time RT-PCR. All the patients were treated by RRP with extended dissection of pelvic lymph nodes, and 3 of them by external radiotherapy in addition after recovery from urinary incontinence because of positive surgical margins, followed by adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy.@*RESULTS@#Real-time RT-PCR showed positive mRNA expressions of PSA and PSMA in the lymph fluid of the 11 patients, all pathologically confirmed with PLNM. The median intraoperative blood loss was 575 ml, with blood transfusion for 5 cases. Positive surgical margin was found in 3 cases, lymphorrhagia in 2 and urinary leakage in another 2 each. There were no such severe complications as vascular injury and rectum perforation. The patients were followed up for 6－48 (mean 42) months, during which, biochemical recurrence was observed in 12 cases at a median of 12 months postoperatively and 2 patients died at 12 and 48 months respectively.@*CONCLUSIONS@#Bilateral PLG and lymph node aspiration for examination of the mRNA expressions of PSA and PSMA in the lymph fluid help to confirm PLNM preoperatively. Radical retropubic prostatectomy with adjuvant androgen deprivation or external radiotherapy is safe and effective for the treatment of PCa with PLNM, but it should be chosen cautiously for those with Gleason 5+5.

Significance of Neoadjuvant Hormonal Therapy in Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy: A Retrospective Single-Surgeon Study

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether neo-adjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) prior to radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) for prostate cancer (PCa) is beneficial in terms of surgical outcomes and for preventing or delaying biochemical recurrence via single-surgeon case series study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-three men underwent RRP by a single surgeon. The patients were divided into two groups according to whether or not NHT was performed prior to RRP. The study was analyzed retrospectively. We evaluated clinical parameters, surgical parameters, and biochemical recurrence rate. Group 1 (n=34) was treated with RRP only, while Group 2 (n=19) underwent RRP along with NHT. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in clinical, operation-related and pathological factors between the two groups (p>0.05). There was also no significant difference in biochemical recurrence rate between the two groups at the last follow-up, although Group 2 tended to have a lower PCa recurrence rate than Group 1 and the initial prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was significantly higher in Group 2 than Group 1 (p=0.0496). CONCLUSION: The present single-surgeon case series study revealed a trend toward a lower rate of PCa recurrence in NHT+RRP treated patients compared to those treated with RRP alone, but this did not reach statistical significance, despite the fact that NHT+RRP patients exhibited higher serum PSA levels preoperatively. Prospective studies with a longer duration of observation and a greater number of patients would be helpful in evaluating NHT more definitively.

Is there any evidence of superiority between retropubic, laparoscopic or robot-assisted radical prostatectomy?

PURPOSE: To compare the perioperative, short-term and long-term postoperative results of radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP), laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) in the most recent studies evaluable. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using PubMed we have undertaken a search based on references from major and recent articles with considerable sample sizes. RESULTS: The operative blood loss and the risk of transfusion were lower in the laparoscopic and robotic-assisted approaches. The surgical duration was shorter in the open and robotic group. Regarding the positive margins, continence and potency no substantial differences between the RRP, LRP, and RALP were found. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that no one surgical approach is superior in terms of functional and early oncologic outcomes. Potential advantages of any surgical approach have to be confirmed through longer-term follow-up and adequately designed clinical studies.

Radical prostatectomy outcomes at the university hospital of the West Indies: 2000-2007 / Evolución clínica de la prostatectomía radical en el hospital universitario de West Indies: 2000-2007

OBJECTIVES: Prostate cancer is the commonest cancer in Jamaican men with an age-specific incidence of 65.5 per 100 000 and also the commonest cause of male cancer death. This study reports on the oncological outcome and morbidity after radical retropubic prostatectomy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The records of 116 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer (cT1c-T2) who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy at the University Hospital of the West Indies from January 2000 to December 2007 were examined. Preoperative Prostate specific antigen (PSA), clinical stage and Gleason score were recorded. Operative time, blood loss, hospital stay and complications were assessed. Oncological outcome was assessed using biochemical progression. Disease progression was defined by PSA value of 0.4 ng/ml or greater. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 61 (43-75) years. The mean presenting PSA was 10.1 (2-25.1) ng/ml. Mean Gleason score on preoperative biopsy was 6. The commonest clinical stage was T1c (68%). Nodal involvement was seen in only one patient. The positive surgical margin rate was 15.5%. Mean operating time was 246 minutes and mean estimated blood loss was 1.44 L. The mean hospital stay was 6.9 days and 17% of patients developed minor complications, with no treatment or disease related deaths. Five-year biochemical-free survival was 78.4%. CONCLUSIONS: Oncological outcomes after radical retropubic prostatectomy in Jamaica appear to meet global standards with acceptable morbidity.

OBJETIVOS: El cáncer de la próstata es el cáncer más común entre los hombres jamaicanos con una incidencia específica por edad de 65.5 por 100 000, y es también la causa más común de la muerte por cáncer entre los hombres. Este estudio reporta la evolución clínica oncológica y la morbilidad tras la prostatectomía radical retropúbica. MÉTODOS: Se examinaron las historias clínicas de 116 pacientes con cáncer de próstata clínicamente localizado (cT1c - T2), sometidos a prostatectomía radical retropúbica en el Hospital Universitario de West Indies de enero de 2000 a diciembre 2007. Se registraron el antígeno específico de próstata (AEP) preoperativo, la etapa clínica y la puntuación de Gleason. Se evaluaron el tiempo operativo, la pérdida de sangre, la estadía hospitalaria, y las complicaciones. Se evaluó la evolución clínica oncológica usando la progresión bioquímica. La progresión de la enfermedad se definió por el valor del AEP de 0.4 ng/ml o mayor. RESULTADOS: La edad promedio de los pacientes fue 61 (43-75) años. El AEP promedio fue PSA 10.1 (2-25.1) ng/ml. La puntuación promedio Gleason en la biopsia preoperativa fue 6. La etapa clínica más común fue T1c (68%). Se observó compromiso de nódulos en sólo un paciente. La tasa de márgenes quirúrgicos positivos fue 15.5%. El tiempo promedio de operación fue 246 minutos y la pérdida de sangre promedio estimada fue 1.44 L. La estadía hospitalaria promedio fue de 6.9 días y 17% de los pacientes desarrollaron complicaciones menores, sin tratamiento o enfermedad relacionados con muertes. La supervivencia quinquenal libre del uso de productos bioquímicos fue 78.4%. CONCLUSIONES: Los resultados oncológicos después de la prostatectomía retropúbica radical en Jamaica muestran estar en correspondencia con los estándares globales con una morbilidad aceptable.

The Factor Affecting Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy: The Bony Pelvic Shape Imaged by Magnetic Resonance Imaging / 대한비뇨기과학회지

PURPOSE: We investigated how the bony pelvic shape, as imaged by preoperative magnetic resonance imaging(MRI), affects radical retropubic prostatectomy(RRP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We investigated 27 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy between January 2004 and December 2006 in our hospital. We obtained images of their pelvic bone size on the sagittal plane by performing pelvic MRI. We measured the true conjugate diameter, the obstetric conjugate diameter and the difference between the former and the latter. In addition, we examined the age, body mass index(BMI), prostate-specific antigen(PSA), prostate volume, Gleason's score, pathologic stage, operative time, the estimated blood loss and the surgical margin involvement. We analyzed the factors that affected the estimated blood loss, operative time and surgical margin involvement by multiple linear regression analysis and multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 66.7+/-5.3 years, the true conjugate diameter and obsteric conjugate diameter were 105+/-8.9mm and 94.5+/-9.2 mm respectively, the difference of the diameters was 10.7+/-4.3mm, the BMI was 24.1+/-2.6kg/m(2), the PSA was 22.9+/-34.2ng/ml and the prostate volume was 33.7+/-14g. The estimated blood loss was 1,152.2+/-356.4cc, the operation time was 144.4+/-28.6 minutes and 8 patients had positive surgical margins. On the multiple linear regression analysis, the estimated blood loss increased 66cc in proportion to a 1mm difference between the true conjugate diameter and the obstetric conjugate diameter(p<0.001). The BMI was associated with the operative time on the multiple linear regression analysis(p=0.048). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with RRP, the BMI was associated with the operative time. The estimated blood loss increased in proportion to the difference between the true conjugate diameter and the obstetric conjugate diameter, as measured by pelvic MRI before operation. We suggest that the symphyseal surface variability can be the one of the factors that affects the degree of operative difficulty.

The Incidence and Risk Factors for Inguinal Hernia after Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy / 대한비뇨기과학회지

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the risk factors for developing an inguinal hernia after undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy(RRP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively investigated the hospital records of 382 patients who underwent RRP and who were followed over 12 month periods at our institute between January 2000 and December 2006. All the operations were performed by a single surgeon. The clinical and pathological parameters were compared between the patients with and without inguinal hernia, and the risk factors were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 64.6 years(range, 40 to 83). 32(8.3%) of the 382 patients developed an inguinal hernia at a mean time of 14 months. 8(25.8%) of 32 patients developed an inguinal hernia within 6 months, 23(61.8%) within 1 year, 26(83.9%) within 2 years and 28 (90.3%) developed an inguinal hernia within 3 years. 25(78.1%) developed an inguinal hernia in the right side, 3(9.4%) in left and 4(12.5%) developed an inguinal hernia in both sides. The operative time(p50cc, p=0.012) were independent predictors for post-prostatectomy inguinal hernia. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study show that the duration of surgery, pelvic lymph node dissection, the presence of transfusion and the prostate volume all increase the risk of post-radical retropubic prostatectomy inguinal hernia.

The Role of Retrograde Urethrography as a Predictor of Early Recovery of Urinary Continence after Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy

PURPOSE: This study is designed to explore the role of retrograde urethrography as a predictor of recovery of urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 40 patients who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy from January 2005 to April 2007 were investigated. Among them one neurogenic bladder patient and one follow up loss patient were excluded. Voiding pattern and urinary incontinence were investigated with voiding diary monthly after Foley catheter removal. Recovery of urinary continence was defined as usage of less than 1 diaper per day. Pericatheter urethrography was conducted 2 weeks after operation. If definite bladder-urethral extravasation was not detected, an retrograde urethrography was performed immediately. 30 patients with sufficient length of urethra, regular margin of urethra and beaky appearance were defined as Group A, and 8 patients without above mentioned characteristics were marked as Group B. Differences between two groups were compared in terms of age, prostate volume, prostate specific antigen, urodynamic parameters, and duration of urinary incontinence. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in age, prostate volume, PSA between two groups. In group A, recovery rates of urinary continence were 70% (21 persons), 100% (30 persons) at 1,3 months after removal of catheter, respectively. In group B, rates of urinary continence recovery were 16.6% (1 person), 37.5% (3 persons), 75% (6 persons) at 1,3,4 months, respectively and 1 person regained continence at 7 months. CONCLUSION: A catheter free retrograde urethrography can be easily added after confirmation of bladder urethra anastomosis site healing. It gives us some valuable informations about external sphincter. The characteristics of retrograde urethrography can be used as a predictor of early recovery of postoperative incontinence.

The Results of Retropubic Prostatectomy and Transu- rethral Resection of Prostate; Compare Both Results, and then Investigate the Cause of Different Results / 대한비뇨기과학회지

PURPOSE: To retrospectively compare the results of a retropubic prostatectomy to that of a transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and investigated the causes of the different results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients were retrospectively included in each group, who were operated on by one experienced urologist. The direct outcomes, such as max flow rate (Qmax), prostate and transitional zone (TZ) volumes, proximal prostatic urethral width, and transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) and urethroscopic findings, and intermediate outcomes, such as International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and Quality of Life (QOL), were measured both before and after the operation. The adenoma resection rates (resected volume/preoperative TZ volume) were compared and its value investigated. RESULTS: In the retropubic prostatectomy group, the IPSS and QOL decreased from 24.5+/-4.9 and 4.3+/-1.0 to 4.8+/-3.3 and 1.2+/-0.9, respectively, and the Qmax increased from 6.3+/-2.6 to 23.1+/-6.6ml/sec. In the TURP group, the IPSS and QOL decreased from 23.5+/-6.0 and 3.9+/-1.3 to 12.0+/-9.0 and 1.6+/-1.4, respectively, and the Qmax increased from 8.2+/-3.6 to 16.6+/-7.7ml/sec. The adenoma resection rate and proximal prostatic urethra width were 0.98 (mean, max=1.63, min=0.30) and 8.5+/-3.7mm, respectively, in the retropubic prostatectomy group, compared with 0.61 (mean, max=1.41, min=0.35), 4.3+/-1.9mm in the TURP group. In the retropubic prostatectomy group, the proximal prostatic urethra was wider and more symmetrical and its surface more even (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A retropubic prostatectomy achieved a better result than the TURP, because the proximal prostatic urethra was more symmetrical and its surface more even.

Early Catheter Removal after Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy / 대한비뇨기과학회지

PURPOSE: There is a trend towards early catheter removal after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP). Therefore, the feasibility of early catheter removal after RRP was explored. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four consecutive patients having undergone a RRP performed by one surgeon were divided into two groups. Groups A and B comprised the patients who had their cystography taken either 6 or 14 days after surgery, respectively. Voiding symptoms in the immediate (after catheter removal) and late postoperative (1 month after catheter removal) periods were assessed. The mean patient ages were 68.8, ranging from 59 to 76 and 66.8, ranging from 61 to 73 years in groups A and B (p=0.37), respectively. The Mean follow-up was 4.3 months (1-9). RESULTS: One patient in each group showed significant urine leakage on cystography, which required a further week of catheter indwelling. In group A, 8 patients (72.7%) needed pads for their incontinence immediately after catheter removal and 3 (27.3%) required pads continuously 1 month after catheter removal. In group B, incontinence that required pads developed in 9 patients (81.8%) immediately after catheter removal, and in 3 (27.3%) 1 month after catheter removal. One patient in group A required a 3-day Foley catheter indwelling for urinary retention. There were 4 (36.4%) and 2 (18.2%) patients in groups A and B, respectively, with weak urinary stream (Qmax<15ml/sec). CONCLUSIONS: A catheter can be safely removed, with caution, 6 days after a radical retropubic prostatectomy for the development of urinary retention and weak stream, which might be caused by anastomotic edema and transiently decreased bladder contractility.

Initial Experience of Three Cases of Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy / 대한비뇨기과학회지

From December 1986 to August 1988, three patients with early prostatic cancer diagnosed primarily by fine needle aspriation cytology and/or Tru-cut needle biopsy underwent potency preserving radical retropubic prostatectomy. Herin we report the results and associated problems. Most difficulty was the diagnosis of the early prostatic cancer. We used fine needle aspiration cytology to diagnose the prostatic cancer primarily. One case of class V on the preoperative cytologic examination has proved to be BPH with chronic prostatitis postoperatively. Another problem was possibility of major bleeding intraoperatively, and complications were uncommon and not serious.

Initial Experience of Three Cases of Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy / 대한비뇨기과학회지

From December 1986 to August 1988, three patients with early prostatic cancer diagnosed primarily by fine needle aspriation cytology and/or Tru-cut needle biopsy underwent potency preserving radical retropubic prostatectomy. Herin we report the results and associated problems. Most difficulty was the diagnosis of the early prostatic cancer. We used fine needle aspiration cytology to diagnose the prostatic cancer primarily. One case of class V on the preoperative cytologic examination has proved to be BPH with chronic prostatitis postoperatively. Another problem was possibility of major bleeding intraoperatively, and complications were uncommon and not serious.

Clinical Observation of Retropubic Prostatectomy in Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia / 대한비뇨기과학회지

A clinical observation was made on twenty cases of retropubic prostatectomy from June, 30 1978 to June 30, 1981. The results were summerized as follows. 1. The mean operation time was 92 minutes in retropubic prostatectomy. 2. The mean amount of blood transfusion was 1.2 pint. Transfusion was done in 75% of retropubic prostatectomy. 3. The mean duration of the urethral catheter indwelling was 8.85 days. 4. The mean duration of hospitalization was 9.6 days. 5. The weight of adenomatous tissue enucleated ranged from 20 to 52gm. 6. Postoperative complications were urinary infections in 12 cases, temporary incontinence in 5 cases, urethral strictures, wound abscesses and pyrexia. The mortality rate was 0%.

Hemostatic Retropubic Prostatectomy / 대한비뇨기과학회지

A method of bleeding control of the retropubic prostatectomy has been described and our experience with 10 cases underwent this method in recent 2 years has been presented. The results the summarized as follows: 1. Operating time required between 70 and 120 minutes, mean operating time 90. 5 minutes. 2. Blood loss attributable to operating manipulation was 225cc in average and none required blood transfusion during surgery except one patient received one pint blood postoperatively. 3. The duration of gross hematuria persisted postoperatively was between 2 and 5 days, 2.9 days in average. The shortest hospital stay was 9 days and the longest 15 days in patient with wound dehiscence, 11 days in average. Postoperative indwelling catheter was left in plate between 7 and 10 days, 8.3 days in average. 4. No severe complications other than temporary incontinence developed in a case and wound dehiscence in 2 was observed postoperatively.