Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Acta Medica Philippina ; : 63-68, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-1006817

RESUMO

Background@#Surgical correction of aphakia without capsular support continues to be a challenge. Improvements in the technology of cataract surgery have provided advancements in techniques in surgical management of aphakia. Locally, we have limited data on the outcomes of the different intraocular lenses used in aphakia.@*Objective@#This study aimed to determine visual outcomes and complications associated with different techniques of intraocular lens implantation in the absence of capsular support.@*Methods@#We reviewed the medical charts of 207 patients who underwent intraocular lens implantation without capsular support. Excluded were patients with incomplete follow up, pediatric patients, and lost records. Best corrected visual acuity at day 1, 1st month, 3rd month and 6th month postoperatively, and the complications were noted.@*Results@#Mean age was 60 and 51% (n=105) were females. The mean follow-up time was 9.33 ± 0.71 months. Loss of capsular support was most frequently caused by intraoperative complication (n=146, 70%) and trauma. Retropupillary fixation iris claw intraocular lens was frequently used (n=93, 44.9%). Across all patients, visual acuities showed excellent outcomes with 20/50 or better. Across IOL types, the most frequent postoperative complication was increase in IOP. Statistically significant results were set at P <0.05. @*Conclusion@#There is a notable preference towards iris claw retropupillary lenses through time. Iris claw lenses showed the shortest operative time. All intraocular lenses used in aphakia showed comparably good postoperative visual acuities, except for the superior visual acuity trend seen among retropupillary iris claw and anterior chamber IOL groups. Complications included elevated intraocular pressures, corneal edema, and pigment dispersion.


Assuntos
Afacia , Filipinas
2.
International Eye Science ; (12): 2130-2136, 2021.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-904688

RESUMO

@#AIM: To compare the curative effect of retropupillary iris claw intraocular lens(IOL)implantation and posterior chamber ciliary scleral suture fixed IOL in the aphakic eyes without capsular support.<p>METHODS: The present retrospective study included 70 aphakic eyes without capsular support. According to the different surgical methods, the patients were divided into two groups, including group A(35 eyes)with treatment of retropupillary iris claw IOL implantation, group B(35 eyes)with treatment of posterior chamber ciliary scleral suture fixed IOL. The uncorrected visual acuity(UCVA), best corrected visual acuity(BCVA), intraocular pressure(IOP)and corneal endothelial cell density(CECD)of the two groups were documented and compared before operation and 3d, 1, 3, 6mo and 1a after operation. Furthermore, the stability of IOL in both groups, as well as the intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded.<p>RESULTS: The patients in the present study were followed up for 12 to 14mo. 3d after surgery, UCVA in group A was significantly improved compared with that before surgery(<i>P</i><0.01), while BCVA had no difference compared with that before surgery(<i>P</i>=0.073).UCVA in group B showed no difference(<i>P</i>=0.097), while BCVA was worse(<i>P</i>=0.002). UCVA and BCVA in both groups were significantly elevated 1mo after surgery(<i>P</i><0.05), and remained stable 6, 3mo later,respectively. Furthermore, IOP in both groups remained in normal level during the follow up period, 0.7% and 2.3% reduction of CECD in A group and B gruop was observed at 1a after operation respectively(<i>P</i><0.05). Both IOP and CECD between the two groups have no significant differenc at each time point during the follow up period(<i>P</i>>0.05).There was no significant difference between whole eye astigmatism and corneal astigmatism in A group and B gruop at 1 and 6mo after operation(<i>P</i>>0.05). Additionally, There was 1 case of IOL dislocation in each group after operation, which was further recovered by operation. Significant tilt and deviation of IOL were not observed in the rest of the patients during the follow up period. The other postoperative complications were mild with no difference in complications between the two groups(<i>P</i>>0.05).<p>CONCLUSION: For aphakic eyes without capsular support, both retropupillary iris claw IOL implantation and posterior chamber ciliary scleral suture fixed IOL are safe and effective surgical methods. Retropupillary iris claw IOL implantation has relatively simple operation, lower damage to the eyeball tissue, the shorter operation time, and the quicker recovery of postoperative visual acuity, which is one of the effective clinical treatments.

3.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 2016 Oct; 64(10): 743-746
Artigo em Inglês | IMSEAR | ID: sea-181287

RESUMO

Context: Surgical outcome of retropupillary fixation of iris claw lens. Aims: To evaluate the various indications, intra and post‑operative complications, and visual outcome of retropupillary fixation of iris claw lens in aphakic eyes. Settings and Design: The study design is a retrospective study at a tertiary eye care center. Methods: Review of medical records of 61 aphakic eyes of 61 patients, who were rehabilitated with retropupillary fixation of an iris claw lens, with a follow‑up duration of at least 1 year. Statistical Analysis Used: Data analysis was performed using paired t‑test and Chi‑square test. Results: Mean preoperative uncorrected visual acuity was 1.66 ± 0.3 LogMAR and postoperative acuity at 1 year was 0.53 ± 0.5 LogMAR (P = 0.00001). Preoperative distant best‑corrected visual acuity was 0.30 ± 0.48 LogMAR and postoperative acuity at 1 year was 0.27 ± 0.46 LogMAR (P = 0.07). Mean preoperative astigmatism was 1.43 ± 1.94 D and postoperatively was 1.85 ± 2.16 D (P = 0.0127). Mean endothelial cell count was 2353.52 ± 614 cells/mm² preoperatively which decreased to 2200 ± 728 cells/mm² at 1 year follow‑up (P = 0.006). There was no significant difference in central macular thickness and intraocular pressure pre and post-surgery. Complications included ovalization of pupil in 9.83%, hypotony in 1.63%, toxic anterior segment syndrome in 1.63%, cystoid macular edema in 11.47%, epiretinal membrane in 3.27%, and iris atrophy in 6.55%. Conclusion: Iris claw is a safe and an effective method of rehabilitating aphakic eyes.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA