Donor Safety in Living Donor Liver Transplantation Using Right Lobe / 대한이식학회지

PURPOSE: Right lobe donation is technically more difficult and need to define surgical technique and has more risk for surgical complication. Right lobe donation usually matched graft size but safety of donor is major concern. In this paper, we reviewed our experience of donor hepatectomy using right lobe in regarding to safe of our donor operations, retrospectively. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 42 donor operations for adult LDLT using right lobe was performed. We observed the patient characteristics, the operative findings, peak liver enzymes (AST, ALT, bilirubin) as donor risk and mortality, morbidity. RESULTS: The peak value of liver enzymes in the group of less the 30% of remained liver were significantly higher than the group of more than 30% of remained liver and these values could induced the risk on donor. The postoperative peak value of liver enzymes were increased according to degree of fatty change especially in case of more than 10% fatty change even without significance. We observed the liver regeneration on postoperative 3 months and the regeneration of liver volume on postoperative 3 months was about two times compare to preoperative value and the regenerative activity was more increased in the group of less amount of remained volume. There was no donor mortality and most important complication was biliary complication, in which were biliary injury, bile leakage and biliary stricture. CONCLUSION: Right lobectomy for donor operation requires a meticulous surgical technique to minimize donor morbidity. Right lobectomy can be performed safely with minimal risk in case of careful donor selection that the remained liver volume exceed 30% of the total liver volume and the liver of minimal fatty change.

Safety of Donor in Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation

PURPOSE: Right lobe donation was advocated to overcome size-mismatch between left lobe and larger-size recipient in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), however, safety of donor is a major concern. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety of donor in adult-to-adult LDLT. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 104 adult-to-adult LDLT was performed by comparison of left lobectomy (n=50) and right lobectomy (n=54) groups. RESULTS: The median age of donors was 28 years and offsprings were most common donors (33.7%). The right lobe graft provided larger mass by 60% than left lobe. The ratio of residual liver volume to total liver volume, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative ICU stay showed significant differences in both groups. Recovery of liver profiles was delayed by several days in right lobectomy group, but all donors recovered uneventfully. There was no mortality nor sequela in both groups. Severe postoperative complications occured more frequently in right lobectomy group, and they were bile leakage (n=3), postoperative bleeding (n=5), and portal vein thrombosis (n=1). All complications were controlled with safety. CONCLUSION: Right lobe harvesting can be safe but should be performed only by expert operators because there is potential operative risk. To minimize operative complications, attention should be paid to every step of procedures and to postoperative surveillance.

Right Hepatic Lobectomy for Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Safety, anatomical points, and technical points

BACKGROUND: Living related liver transplantation (LRLT) has gained acceptance as treatment modality for children with end-stage liver disease. The left lobe used in LRLT doesn't provide adequate parenchymal mass for its application to adults. We have used right lobe for LRLT in adults. Some criticism has been aroused becuase of the potential significant risk to the donors. METHODS: We analyzed the surgical risk and the stress to 20 donors in a right lobectomy for LRLT. We also analyzed anatomical points for safe harvest, and we describe techincal points based on anatomical variations. RESULTS: There were no deaths, and 6 major complications (3 bleeding, 1 perihepatic fluid collection, 1 pleural effusion, and 1 bile peritonitis after removal of the T-tube) occurred in 6 patients. Liver function was normalized within 2 weeks. There were anatomical variations in the hepatic vein, the portal vein, and the bile duct, especially the right inferior hepatic vein (55%), trifurcation of the portal vein (10%), low inserion of the right posterior bile duct into the common hepatic duct (10%), and separate insertion of the right anterior bile duct and right posterior bile duct into the hepatic duct (10%). We made a vena cava patch for the right inferior hepatic vein. In cases of the low insertion of the right posterior hepatic duct into the common hepatic duct, the cholecystectomy should be done carefully so as not to injure the right posterior hepatic duct. We ligated and divided the right posterior bile duct before dissection of the hepatic artery and the portal vein. In cases of trifurcation of the portal vein, closure of the left portal vein should be done to prevent the narrowing of the left portal vein lumen. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that a right lobectomy for LRLT is safe for donors. However, anatomical variations in the bile duct, the hepatic vein, and the portal vein should be kept in mind to ensure a safe and successful operation.

A Case of Biliary Papillomatosis which Underwent Curative Resection / 대한소화기내시경학회지

Biliary Papillomatosis is an extremely rare pathologic entity. Only about 40 cases of intrahepatic or diffuse intra- and extrahepatic papillomatosis have been described since the first report in 1959 by Caroli. Although this is a histologically benign lesion, its course is unfavaurable because of its tendency to extend to the entire biliary tract, high recurrence rate following local excision and the probability of progression to malignancy. We described herein a case of biliary papillomatosis associated with diffuse bile duct dilatation. The patient, a 59-year-old male, was admitted to our hospital because of right upper abdominal pain and weight loss. Cholangiogram revealed multiple round filling defects in common hepatic duct with intrahepatic bile duct dilatation. The patient underwent Whipple's operation with right lobectomy. Grossly, multiple small pin-head sized polypoid masses were seen in common bile duct, common hepatic duct and right intrahepatic duct. Microscapically, papillary epithelial hyperplasia with moderate cellular atypia was seen and there was no evidence of stromal invasion. He is healthy with a follow-up for 7 months.