RESUMO
RESUMEN: Dentro del daño estético, las cicatrices son las secuelas más frecuentes. Al momento de su valoración médicolegal, hay que considerar las distintas formas en que se pueden presentar, además de su visibilidad a distancia. El objetivo de esta revisión es conocer los distintos métodos existentes usados para la valoración del perjuicio estético causado por cicatrices faciales. Se realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica en PubMed y Scielo, obteniéndose cuatro artículos atingentes al tema. Llama la atención la escasez de métodos estandarizados para su valoración, advirtiendo, además, que los pocos baremos existentes son para valorar el daño en el ámbito civil o laboral. Para estandarizar los criterios clínicos y medicolega les es recomendable el uso de métodos cuantitativos. Finalmente, al momento de evaluar las secuelas de las lesiones, es importante considerar no sólo el compromiso estético y funcional, sino también las implicancias biopsicosociales en la vida del individuo.
ABSTRACT: In relating to facial aesthetic damage, scars are the most frequently observed. When these scars are assessed for medico-legal purpose, it is necessary to consider the different ways in which they can be presented, and their visibility from distance. This review has as objective to evaluate the different existing methods used for the assessment of cosmetic damage caused by facial scars. The bibliographic search was carried out in PubMed and Scielo, where four articles related to the topic were found. The shortage of standardized methods for their assessment is striking, in addition, draws attention that the few existing scales are used to assess the damage in civil and labour affairs. To standardize clinical and medico-legal criteria, the use of quantitative methods is recommended. Finally, to evaluate the result of the injuries, it is important to consider not only the aesthetic and functional consequences, but also the biopsychosocial implications in the life of an individual.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare the scar formation and hand function between moist exposed burn ointment (MEBO) treatment and conventional skin graft in full thickness hand burns. METHOD: Prospective comparative study was done between MEBO treatment group and conventional skin graft group. Full thickness burn wound scars on dorsal hand were compared. Scars were assessed with the Vancouver scar scale and other objective measurement tools such as pigmentation, erythema, pliability, transepideramal water loss, thickness and perfusion. Hand function was evaluated by the Jebsen hand function test and Michigan Hand Function Questionnaire. RESULTS: Vancouver Scar scale showed significantly better scores in the MEBO group than in the conventional skin graft group. Scar thickness and transepidermal water loss were greater in the MEBO treatment group whereas pigmentation value was greater in the conventional skin graft group. There was no significant difference in the hand function between the two groups. CONCLUSION: MEBO application could be an alternative treatment to conventional skin graft treatment in full thickness hand burn wounds. In the future, more studies are yet to come how MEBO treatment may affect the skin condition of the burn injuries.