RESUMO
Objetivo: Comparar el rendimiento y seguridad de las colonoscopías de screening en el diagnóstico del cáncer colorrectal en dos grupos de pacientes añosos. Materiales y Método: Un análisis retrospectivo de pacientes sometidos a colonoscopías de screening en Clínica INDISA, desde noviembre de 2017 hasta marzo de 2019. Se excluyeron pacientes con síntomas de alarma según criterios de Roma IV, colonoscopías de urgencia y terapéuticas. Se compararon 2 grupos de pacientes: Grupo I entre 70-79 años y Grupo II mayores de 80 años. El objetivo primario fue el rendimiento diagnóstico de la colonoscopía de screening, definida como su capacidad para identificar hallazgos significativos definidos como la presencia de adenomas, displasia de alto grado y cáncer colorrectal. Los resultados secundarios consideraron la morbilidad y mortalidad del procedimiento. Análisis estadístico descriptivo e inferencial. Resultados: Un total de 125 pacientes cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión; Grupo I: 70 pacientes y Grupo II: 55 pacientes. Los hallazgos significativos se presentaron en un 27,1% en el Grupo I y en 30,9% en el Grupo II (p = 0,675). No se observaron diferencias en la calidad de la preparación intestinal o las complicaciones relacionadas con el procedimiento. Discusión y Conclusión: Las colonoscopías de screening en el diagnóstico de cáncer colorrectal son bien toleradas en pacientes mayores de 80 años, con un rendimiento equivalente en comparación al grupo más joven. Dado el aumento de la esperanza de vida, se recomienda realizar colonoscopías en octogenarios, especialmente en aquellos con buen estado de salud.
Aim: To compare diagnostic yield of significant findings rate and safety of screening colonoscopies in two groups of elderly patients. Materials and Method: A retrospective analysis was performed on patients who underwent screening colonoscopies at INDISA Clinic, from November 2017 to March 2019. Exclusion criteria were those with "alarm" symptoms according to Rome IV criteria, emergencies and therapeutic colonoscopies were excluded. Comparison groups were patients between 70-79 years old (Grupo I), and those over 80 years old (Grupo II). The primary outcome was the diagnostic yield of screening colonoscopy, defined as its capacity to identify adenomas, high-grade dysplasia, and colorectal cancer. Secondary outcomes were morbidity and mortality of the procedure. Statistical analysis was descriptive and inferential. Results: A total of 125 patients met our inclusion criteria; Grupo I: 70 and Grupo II 55 patients. Significant findings were observed in 27.1% in Grupo I and 30.9% in Grupo II (p = 0.675). No differences in bowel prep quality or procedure-related complications were observed between both groups. Discussion and Conclusion: Screening colonoscopies for colorectal cancer are well tolerated in patients over 80 years of age, with equivalent diagnostic rates compared with the younger patient group. Given the increasing life expectancy worldwide, it is recommended to continue checking for colorectal cancer with screening colonoscopies in octogenarians, particularly healthy ones.
RESUMO
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major cause of cancer mortality worldwide, and this has led to an increased use of screening colonoscopy. This screening has resulted in long-term risk reduction in asymptomatic individuals. However, endoscopists may fail to detect advanced adenomas or colon cancer during screening. The reasons that adenomas or cancers are missed are thought to be associated with the location of the lesions or the skills of the endoscopist. To address the limitations of white light endoscopy (WLE) for adenoma detection, advanced endoscopic images have recently been used. Image-enhanced endoscopies (IEEs), including the use of topical dyes, optical filtering, and ultramagnification, allow for gastrointestinal lesion analysis. Many studies have compared the adenoma detection rate (ADR) obtained by using WLE and IEE, but with different results. IEE can be used to help the endoscopist to improve their ADR in screening colonoscopy. This review examines the possible roles of image-enhanced colonoscopy in CRC screening.