Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Archives of Orofacial Sciences ; : 69-75, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-962205

RESUMO

ABSTRACT@#Implant prosthesis is a popular treatment modality but it is not complication free. This article discussed the management of a cemented, all-ceramic implant crown in the maxillary anterior region that had veneering ceramic fracture after three years in function. A screw-retained prosthesis was prescribed to avoid the show of the screw access channel on the incisal edge of the crown. This was achieved by changing the location of the screw hole using the angle screw channel that overcame the angulation issue.


Assuntos
Facetas Dentárias
2.
Rev. Fac. Odontol. Univ. Antioq ; 30(2): 264-271, Jan.-June 2019. graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-1092027

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Rehabilitation of the partially edentulous anterior maxilla is considered one of the most difficult challenges for the restorative dentist due to the esthetic, functional and psychological implications. Implant-supported restorations provide an appealing treatment alternative that responds to today's patient expectations. The gold standard for this scenario has been the use of an implant-supported fixed partial denture with pontics that masks the soft tissue deficiencies, with acceptable esthetic results. However, nowadays patients are looking for individual single crowns since they believe that this type of restorations resemble the natural dentition, are easy to clean and floss. From the dentist perspective, they are easy to maintain and in case of prosthetic complications they can be repaired or changed without compromising the adjacent restorations. Three parameters have been identified that could guide the decision-making process when multiple adjacent implant supported restorations (MAISR) are selected as the treatment of choice: 1) Smile line 2) Inter-implant distance and tooth-implant distance 3) Patient's expectations and ability to clean.


RESUMEN La rehabilitación del maxilar anterior parcialmente edéntulo se considera uno de los retos más difíciles para el dentista restaurador debido a las implicaciones estéticas, funcionales y psicológicas. Las restauraciones apoyadas por implantes proporcionan una alternativa de tratamiento atractiva que responde a las expectativas actuales de los pacientes. El patrón de referencia en este contexto ha sido el uso de una prótesis parcial fija con implantes con pónticos para enmascarar las deficiencias de tejido blando, el cual ha tenido resultados estéticos aceptables. Sin embargo, hoy en día los pacientes están buscando coronas individuales ya que creen que este tipo de restauraciones se asemejan a la dentición natural y son fáciles de limpiar con cepillado e hilo dental. Desde la perspectiva del dentista, son fáciles de mantener y en caso de complicaciones protésicas pueden ser reparadas o cambiadas sin comprometer las restauraciones adyacentes. Se han identificado tres parámetros que podrían guiar el proceso de toma de decisiones cuando se seleccionan varias restauraciones compatibles con implantes adyacentes como el tratamiento de elección: 1) Línea de sonrisa 2) Distancia entre implantes y distancia de implante dental 3) Las expectativas del paciente y la facilidad de limpieza.


Assuntos
Reabilitação Bucal , Implantes Dentários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA