RESUMO
Objective To compare the effects of standard decompressive craniectomy (DC) vs.combined cisternostomy on severe traumatic brain injury (STBI).Methods Seventy-two patients with severe brain injury were divided into standard decompressive craniectomy group (control group,n=34) and DC combined cisternostomy group (treatment group,n=38).The clinical parameters from pre-and post-surgery were compared between the two groups.Results There was no statistical difference in clinical data including gander,age,injury causes,GSC score,Helsinki CT score and operative opportunity between two groups before surgery (P＞0.05).The treatment group was inferior in the duration of decompression (2.8±0.4 h vs.2.5±0.3 h,P＜0.05) relative to control treatment group.However,treatment group were superior to control group in the mean time of admission in neuro-intensive care unit (5.54±3.09 d vs.7.24±2.74 d,P＜0.01),the cumulative time of intracranial pressure (ICP) more than 20 nmHg within seven days after surgery(23.2±4.4 h vs.56.8±8.3 h,P＜0.01),Helsinki CT scores at postoperative day (3(2,5) vs.5(2,9),P＜ 0.01)and Glasgow Outcome Scores (GOS) at 3 month after surgery (P＜0.01).Conclusion DC combined with cisternostomy for STBI is significantly better than standard decompressive craniectomy,which is worth further study by multicenter clinical trials.