RESUMO
Single-arm trial refers to a clinical trial design that does not set up parallel control group, adopts open design, and does not involve randomization and blind method. These features, on the one hand, speed up the process of clinical trials, significantly shorten the time to market and meet the needs of patients with advanced malignancies, but also lead to the uncertainty of single-arm clinical trials themselves. Recently, the US Food and Drug Administration held a meeting of the oncologic drug advisory committee to discuss six tumor indications that have been accelerated approved, which once again triggered the discussion of single-arm trials. The basis of accelerated approval by single-arm trial is actually a compromise on the level of evidence-based medical evidence requirements after assessing the benefit risk. Therefore, the sponsor should strictly grasp the applicable conditions of single-arm trial in anti-tumor drugs and conduct single-arm trial scientifically. Post-marketing clinical trial should be implement as early as possible to ensure the benefit of patients. Based on the characteristics of single-arm trial, combined with two guidance relevant to single-arm trial issued by National Medical Products Administration recently, this article is supposed to propose and summarize the strategy of single-arm trial supporting the marketing of anti-tumor drugs.
Assuntos
Humanos , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Marketing , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Projetos de Pesquisa , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug AdministrationRESUMO
The intention to treat (ITT) principle is widely applied in the randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which is based on the intention to treat a subject (i.e. the planned treatment regimen) rather than the actual treatment given. With the development and progress of clinical trials, ITT principle needs to be reinterpreted. In the standard definition of ITT principle, the intentional grouping of subjects does not specifically refer to randomization, but rather to planned treatment regimen. In non-randomized clinical trials, that subjects agree to be included in a certain treatment regimen is also a type of intention. ITT principles can be applied to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment regimens under patient/doctor determined intentionality in single-arm clinical trials and non-randomized RWS (real world study, RWS). In the practical application, the grouping strategy based on ITT principle should be considered comprehensively according to the research purpose.
RESUMO
Single arm trial (SAT) was widely used for new drug application (NDA) of novel anti-cancer drugs in recent years. The listing time was greatly shortened by SAT while comparing with randomized controlled trials (RCT). Thus, the companies intended to get NDA through SAT. To encourage innovation and accelerate the developments of anti-cancer agents, we summarize the background and key issues of SAT, discuss the conditions of accepting SAT for NDA, and systematically elaborate the design and principles of SAT in this review.