Comparison of Two Methods of Laparoscopic Single Port Appendectomy and Conventional Three Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy

PURPOSE: Acute appendicitis is a type of abdominal disease that requires emergency surgery. Over the past three decades, laparoscopic appendectomy has become the standard operation for acute appendicitis. The aim of this paper is to compare the methods of single port appendectomy and conventional appendectomy and to illustrate the advantages of single port appendectomy. METHODS: The first group of patients underwent single port appendectomy using a surgical glove (Group 1), and those in the second group underwent surgery using the TriPort system (Group 2). The third group of patients underwent conventional three port surgery (Group 3). Questionnaires regarding patient satisfaction with scars were administered via telephone interview. Patient characteristics, histopathological data, postoperative data, and satisfaction score were analyzed by t-test and Pearson chi2 test. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference in satisfaction scores was observed among the three groups. Overall, patients in the single port group using a surgical glove would be more likely to recommend the procedure to friends and family than would patients in the other two groups. Better cosmetic results were achieved for both groups of patients who underwent laparoscopic single port appendectomy, compared to those who underwent conventional three port laparoscopic appendectomy, with statistically significant difference. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic single port appendectomy using a surgical glove is a feasible and safe procedure and shows no differences in terms of risk, such as postoperative complication, compared to a conventional three-trocar technique. Use of this method resulted in better satisfaction compared with the other two groups, illustrating its cosmetic improvement.

The Initial Experience with a Single Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy

PURPOSE: A laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is becoming popular for the treatment of acute and perforated appendicitis. Since it was first described, the LA has been modified many times. We present the result for a new technique of LA, in which the LA is conducted through a single umbilical incision without exteriorizing the appendix to perform the operation. METHODS: A single incision laparoscopic appendectomy was attempted in 25 patients (17 men, 8 women). Under general anesthesia, a wound retractor was inserted through the umbilicus. The appendix was grasped and dissected from surrounding tissues with a single flexible dissector or grasper. After mesenteric dissection with ultrasonic shear, the base of the appendix was ligated with an Endoloop. The appendix was withdrawn into the wound protector and extracted from the abdomen. RESULTS: A single incision laparoscopic appendectomy was completed in 25 patients. No major intraoperative or postoperative complications were encountered. The average duration of the procedure was 50.3+/-21.3 min. The average hospital stay was 4.1+/-2.4 days. CONCLUSION: This new technique, a single incision laparoscopic appendectomy, further improves the minimal invasiveness of a LA because a single incision is used. This procedure is a safe, very minimally invasive procedure with excellent cosmetic results.