Outcomes of surgical sperm retrieval for non-obstructive azoospermia: A single-center experience

INTRODUCTION@#To evaluate the sperm retrieval rate and factors influencing its success among patients who undergo conventional or microsurgical testicular sperm extraction (TESE) for non-obstructive azoospermia.@*METHODS@#Data were from 223 consecutive patients who underwent conventional or microsurgical TESE from August 2011 to January 2021 under two urologists of the center. Data regarding age, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), testosterone, estradiol, testicular size, histopathology, surgical technique, and sperm retrieval were collected. Patients with obstructive azoospermia, repeated TESE procedure, and those who underwent TESE for oncofertility were excluded. Using simple logistic regression analysis, the relationship of the different factors to successful sperm retrieval was computed as odds ratio.@*RESULTS@#The overall surgical sperm retrieval rate was found to be 65.71%. The odds ratio of successful sperm retrieval were 1.04 (95% CI 1.00-1.09) for age, 0.94 (95% CI 0.91-0.97) for FSH, 0.93 (95% CI 0.87-0.99) for LH, 1.24 (95% CI 0.99-1.55) for testosterone, and 0.93 (95% CI 0.88-0.98) for estradiol. Decreased testicular size was also associated significantly with lower sperm retrieval rate (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.09-0.56). Histopathologic pattern and surgical technique were also significantly associated with successful sperm retrieval.@*CONCLUSION@#The surgical sperm retrieval rate in this institution is comparable to the global surgical sperm retrieval rate. Age, FSH, LH, estradiol, testicular size, histopathologic pattern and surgical technique were found to have significant association to successful surgical sperm retrieval.

Evaluación de la eficacia de los laboratorios de embriología y anatomía patológica en el análisis de las biopsias testiculares de pacientes azoospérmicos / Evaluation of the Efficacy of the Laboratories of Embryology and Pathological Anatomy in the Analysis of Testicular Biopsies of Patients with Azoospermia

Objetivos: El propósito de este estudio es evaluar la eficacia de los laboratorios de embriología y de anatomía patológica para hallar espermatozoides en las muestras de tejido testicular obtenido por biopsia testicular (testicular sperm extraction, TESE) en pacientes con azoospermia no obstructiva. Materiales y métodos: Se realizó un análisis retrospectivo y prospectivo de todos los pacientes con azoospermia no obstructiva atendidos en CRECER y en la Clínica Privada Pueyrredón, entre enero de 2006 y diciembre de 2016. En este estudio solo se incluyeron aquellos pacientes en los que la muestra obtenida con TESE fue enviada simultáneamente al anatomopatólogo y al laboratorio de embriología. Para el análisis de los resultados de las biopsias el estudio se detuvo a fines de 2016, pero el seguimiento de los pacientes continuó hasta el mes de octubre de 2017, registrándose todos aquellos casos que realizaron procedimientos de inyección intracitoplasmática de espermatozoides (intracytoplasmic sperm injection, ICSI) con muestras obtenidas de TESE y se anotó la obtención de embriones, embarazos y nacimientos. Resultados: El laboratorio de embriología halló espermatozoides en 36 de los 68 pacientes (52,9%), mientras que el laboratorio de patología solo informó presencia en 21 pacientes (30,88%). Hubo acuerdo en el hallazgo de espermatozoides entre ambos laboratorios en 20 de los 68 casos (29,41%), mientras que en 16 pacientes el laboratorio de embriología encontró espermatozoides donde el de patología no pudo hacerlo (23,53%). Al mismo tiempo, el laboratorio de patología halló espermatozoides solo en un caso en el que el de embriología informó su ausencia para la misma muestra analizada (1,47%) (p=0,0003). Conclusiones: El laboratorio de embriología es significativamente más eficaz para determinar la presencia de espermatozoides en las muestras de TESE, teniendo mejor rendimiento que el de patología, por lo que consideramos que, si las muestras fueran analizadas solo por el patólogo, se perdería la posibilidad de lograr muchos embarazos realizando ICSI más TESE.(AU)

Objectives: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of embryology and pathological anatomy laboratories to find spermatozoa in testicular tissue samples obtained by testicular sperm extraction (TESE) in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia. Materials and methods: It was carried out a retrospective and prospective analysis of all the patients with non-obstructive azoospermia treated at CRECER and at Clínica Privada Pueyrredón, between January 2006 and December 2016. This study only includes patients in whom the sample obtained with TESE was sent at the same time to the pathology and embryology laboratory. For the analysis of the results of the biopsies, the study was stopped at the end of 2016, but the follow-up of the patients continued until October 2017, registering all those cases that performed intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with samples obtained from TESE and wrote down the patients who´ve got embryos, pregnancies, and births. Results: The embryology laboratory found sperm in 36 of the 68 patients (52.9%), while the pathology laboratory only reported presence in 21 patients (30.88%). There was agreement in the finding of sperm between both laboratories in 20 of the 68 cases (29.41%), while in 16 patients the embryology laboratory found sperm where the pathology department could not do so (23.53%). At the same time, the pathology laboratory found sperm only in one case in which the embryology department reported its absence for the same sample analyzed (1.47%) (p=0.0003). Conclusions: The embryology laboratory is significantly more efficient to determine the presence of sperm in the samples of TESE, having better performance than the pathology one. Taking into account that, we believe that if the samples are only analyzed by the pathologist, the possibility of getting many pregnancies performing ICSI plus TESE would be lost. (AU)

Meaning Touch Imprint and Testicular Sperm Extraction(TEST) in Azoospermia Patients during Testis Biopsy / 대한비뇨기과학회지

PURPOSE: Because testicular biopsy traditionally has been performed as a separate operation, there are some needs for immediate interpretation of the testicular biopsy specimen in obstructive azoospermia patients. The realization that a proportion of patients with nonobstructive azoospermia harbor spermatozoa in their testicular parenchyma, combined with the ability of intracytoplasmic sperm injection(ICSI) to effect pregnancy with single sperm, has prompted clinicians to explore testicular sperm extraction(TESE) in these patients. We performed this study to investigate the meaning of touch imprint and TESE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-two patients with azoospermia underwent touch imprint, TESE and simultaneous formal testicular biopsy. Testicular biopsy tissue was touched on a slide and stained using a Diff-Quik method. Tissue obtained from TESE was analyzed by intensive searching to find spermatozoa. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were determined as obstructive azoospermia including two cases of hypospermatogenesis, all patients had sperm seen on touch imprint and TESE. The other patients were diagnosed as nonobstructive azoospermia, testicular histology was divided into two main patterns: Sertoli cell only syndrome, spermatocytic arrest. Touch imprint failed to show sperm, but three of twenty patients(15%) with Sertoli cell only syndrome had sperm present during TESE. CONCLUSIONS: Touch imprint provides high quality cellular detail for immediate review, which can minimize the intraoperative time required to decide upon the appropriateness of correcting the ductal obstruction in obstructive azoospermia patients. Men with nonobstructive azoospermia may have mature spermatozoa present within their testicular parenchyma. Therefore intensive searching for presence of spermatozoa should be performed in tissue obtained from TESE by trained specialist.