RESUMO
【Objective】 To study the relationship between quality of life and clinical symptoms of patients with the first-episode depression. 【Methods】 The untreated patients (n=36) with the first-episode depression and the depression patients (n=71) on drug treatment were included according to the strict screening and exclusion criteria. Subjects in control group (n=59), who matched in age, gender and education, were included according to the corresponding enrollment criteria. World Health Organization Quality of Life—Brief (WHOQOL-BREF) and The Social Adaptation Self-evaluation Scale (SASS) were used to evaluate all the subjects. The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD), The Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) were used to evaluate the depressive patients. 【Results】 There was no significant difference in age or education level between all the groups. The quality of life was significantly lower in the first group and the treatment group than in the control group; no significant difference was found between patients in the two depression groups. Correlation analysis showed that the total scores of physiology, environment and quality of life in the first group and the treatment group were negatively correlated with HAMD, HAMA and MADRS. SASS was positively correlated with the total scores of physiology, psychology, environment and quality of life. 【Conclusion】 The quality of life and social adaptation of patients with the first-episode depression and those with depression after treatment were significantly reduced. More serious depression symptoms are linked to the worse quality of life, while better social adaptation is linked to the better quality of life.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Previous studies have reported that symptoms of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) are different according to age groups, and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) is the most widely used measure to evaluate the symptoms of MDD. However, few previous studies have compared the symptoms of HDRS between the elderly and non-elderly groups. METHODS: The study population consisted of 574 subjects with MDD who were > or =18 years old, evaluated using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview and 17 items of HDRS. Differences between two groups were analyzed using independent t-test. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to evaluate associations between age and 17 items from HDRS after controlling for gender, years of education, marital status, and employment status. RESULTS: Among 574 patients with MDD, there were 80 elderly patients (age> or =65) and 494 non-elderly patients (age between 18 and 64). Elderly patients had higher scores on item 5 (middle insomnia) (t=-2.271, p=0.024) and item 6 (late insomnia) (t=-2.280, p=0.023), whereas they had lower scores on item 1 (depressed mood) (t=2.860, p=0.004), item 3 (suicide) (t=2.258, p=0.024), and item 9 (agitation) (t=2.031, p=0.043), although no significant difference in the total HDRS scores was observed between elderly and non-elderly. Multivariate logistic regression showed significant association of elderly with hypochondriasis [adjusted odds ratio (AOR)=1.894, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-3.56] and agitation (AOR=0.50, 95% CI 0.29-0.87). CONCLUSION: Elderly MDD patients showed more insomnia and hypochondriasis and less depressed mood, suicidal ideation, and agitation than non-elderly.