Reflexões sobre a unidade teoria/prática no serviço social brasileiro: a essência do método de Marx / Reflections on the unit theory/practice in the brazilian Social Work: the essence of Marx's method

Este artigo reforça no tempo presente, onde se intensifica a dinâmica ampliada do capital financeiro, a importância do método do materialismo histórico dialético a partir do rigor teórico da teoria social de Marx, e sua incorporação e aprofundamento pelo Serviço Social brasileiro. Neste sentido, o artigo propõe, por meio de uma revisão de literatura nessa tradição teórico-cultural, adensar a discussão entre os fundamentos do marxismo e a consolidação do Projeto Ético Político do Serviço Social, na apreensão da unidade teoria/prática fundamentada na razão dialética

This article reinforces in the present time, the expanded dynamics of financial capital is intensified, the importance of the method of historical dialectical materialism based on the theoretical rigor of Marx's social theory, and its incorporation and deepening by the Brazilian Social Service. In this sense, the article proposes, through a literature review in this theoretical-cultural tradition, to deepen the discussion between the fundamentals of Marxism and the consolidation of the Project Political Ethical of Social Service, in the apprehension of the theory / practice unit based on dialectical reason

Reflexões sobre a prática profissional do assistente social: relação teoria-prática, historicidade e materialização cotidiana / Reflections on the professional practice of social workers: theory-practice relationship, historicity and materializing everyday

Este ensaio traz um estudo exploratório de cunho bibliográfico acerca do debate em torno da prática profissional dos assistentes sociais. O objetivo é refletir sobre o conceito de prática profissional tratando especificamente de três características: sua historicidade; a relação teoria/prática; sua materialização no cotidiano, as três ancoradas, sobretudo, em autores como: Heller (1992), em relação ao cotidiano; Iamamoto (2007), sobre a historicidade; e Santos (2006) no debate em torno da relação teoria. Neste âmbito, busca-se refletir sobre as potencialidades profissionais almejando contribuir para o debate da categoria e a produção de conhecimento.

This essay reports an exploratory study of bibliographical character concerning the debate on the professional practice of social workers. The goal here is to reflect about the concept of professional practice dealing specifically with three characteristics: it's historicity; the relationship between theory/practice; it's materialization on daily. The three were anchored, mainly, on authors such as Heller (1992), in relation to daily life; Iamamoto (2007), about the historicity; and Santos (2006) on the debate about the theory's relationship. On this context, it was sought to reflect on the professional potentialities, aiming to contribute to the debate on the category and the knowledge's production.

Analysis of the theory-practice integration teaching reform of oral medicine / 中华医学教育探索杂志

Oral medicine is an important clinical subject of Stomatology for higher vocational education. By combining theory-practice integration teaching pattern,and the teaching practice for more than one year and the teaching examples,this article makes an analysis of regarding the complete teaching system such as supporting the teaching outline,notes and textbook,perfect teaching condition,a high quality of Double-professionally-titled Teachers,scientific and effective teaching evaluation system to sum up some teaching rules of the theory-practice integration teaching of oral medicine.

Modelos para pensar: modelos para aplicar Articulación entre la teoría y la práctica / Models for Thinking: Models for Implementing. Articulating Theory and Practice

Objetivo: Este artículo busca establecer las difi cultades y posibilidades para establecer articulaciones entre la teoría y la técnica psicoanalíticas. Desarrollo: Esta articulación se ve difi cultada por los siguientes factores: falta de acuerdo sobre la ubicación del psicoanálisis como ciencia, falta de acuerdo sobre las bases comunes del psicoanálisis, tanto de la técnica como de la teoría, crecimiento exagerado de la teoría respecto de la técnica, falta de acuerdo en la necesidad o no de validar la teoría y métodos para ello, diferentes tipos de modelos teóricos unos comprensivos y otros explicativos, variadas infl uencias sobre la técnica, que no dependen de la teoría. A todo ello se agrega, el giro metodológico y epistémico que se ha producido en el tránsito de una psicología básicamente unipersonal (meta psicología) a una intersubjetiva o interpersonal. Resultado: Se hacen algunas propuestas en relación con la ubicación del psicoanálisis como ciencia, la validación de la teoría analítica, los elementos comunes (common ground) y la articulación entre la técnica y la teoría. Conclusiones: La tan anhelada articulación entre la técnica y la teoría no es posible en la amplitud esperada y los modelos teóricos deben diferenciarse, por lo tanto, en modelos para aplicar (a la práctica) y modelos para pensar.

Objective: This paper aims to describe the diffi culties and possibilities of forging links between psychoanalytical theory and practice. Development: Some of the aspects that diffi cult the establishment of those links are: Lack of agreement about the place of psychoanalysis as a science, lack of agreement about psychoanalysis’ common ground among psychoanalysts regarding technique as well as theory, exaggerated increase of theory compared with technique, lack of agreement about the need to validate theory and the methods for such task, different theoretical models -some comprehensive, some explanatory, and diverse infl uences on technique not stemming from theory. Besides, there is the methodological and epistemological bias produced by the passage from a unipersonal psychology (metapsychology) to an intersubjective or interpersonal one. Results: Proposals are made related to psychoanalysis’ location as a science, validity of the analytical theory, the common ground and linking technique and theory. Conclusions: The longed for linkage between technique and theory is not possible to the expected degree and theoretical models must be differentiated between models for implementing (in practice) and models for thinking.