Value of Transperineal Ultrasound in Short-term Evaluation of Pelvic Organ Prolapse after Transvaginal Mesh Implantation / 中国医学科学院学报

Objective To observe the patients after transvaginal mesh(TVM)implantation surgery by using transperineal ultrasound(TPUS),compare the diagnosis of pelvic organ prolapse(POP)by TPUS and clinical examination[according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification(POP-Q)system published by the International Continence Society],and to explore the role of ultrasound in postoperative evaluation as well as the high-risk factors of post-surgery POP recurrence. Methods This is a retrospective study based on the POP-Q records and TPUS data sets of patients within 6 months after TVM surgery during September 2013 and November 2019.The diagnostic results of TPUS and POP-Q were compared.The incidences of hiatal ballooning and levator avulsion were separately compared between the TPUS group and the control group. Results A total of 147 patients were enrolled.The Kappa values between TPUS and POP-Q in the diagnosis of anterior and posterior compartment POP were 0.268(

Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy Plus Colporrhaphy With an Small Intestine Submucosa Graft Versus Total Pelvic Floor Reconstruction for Advanced Prolapse: A Retrospective Cohort Study / 대한배뇨장애요실금학회지

PURPOSE: Transvaginal mesh (TVM) results in a greater anatomic cure but more complications. We aimed to compare laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) plus colporrhaphy with the small intestine submucosa (SIS) graft versus TVM for advanced pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

Experiencia en el tratamiento del prolapso de órganos pélvicos con mallas vaginales en el Hospital Universitario de Caracas

Objetivo: Describir la experiencia en el tratamiento del prolapso de órganos pélvicos con materiales protésicos en la Unidad de Patología de Piso Pélvico del Hospital Universitario de Caracas. Métodos: Estudio retrospectivo, descriptivo. Se incluyeron pacientes con diagnóstico de prolapso, intervenidas con mallas transvaginales entre enero de 2010 y diciembre de 2011, con seguimiento durante 12 meses (N = 49). Resultados: La edad promedio fue 57 ± 5 años. El índice de masa corporal promedio fue 27 kg/m². El 50,9 % de los prolapsos fueron grado II, 37,7 % grado III y 9,4 % grado IV. De los grados II, el 90 % fueron anteriores el 7 % posteriores y 3 % apicales. De los grados III el 58 % fueron anteriores, 37 % apicales y 5 % posteriores. Se observó 66,8 % de complicaciones. La complicación más frecuente fue la extrusión (25 %), seguido de la dispareunia y el acortamiento vaginal mayor de 1 cm, (10,4 % en ambos). Se presentó 6,3 % de urgencia de novo y 4,2 % de incontinencia urinaria de esfuerzo de novo. El hematoma, la obstrucción infravesical y la fístula vesico-vaginal se presentaron en 2,1 % de los casos. La cura objetiva fue de 95,7 % al año de seguimiento. Se observó 4,3 % de recidiva y 12,5 % de prolapso de novo. Conclusión: Las mallas vaginales representan una alternativa quirúrgica segura y eficiente para la corrección del prolapso genital. Las complicaciones son frecuentes, pero de poca gravedad. Sin embargo, la alta incidencia de erosiones puede afectar la calidad de vida de las pacientes. Palabras clave: Prolapso de órganos pélvicos. Mallas transvaginales. Erosión vaginal.

Objective: To describe the experience of pelvic organ prolapse treatment with transvaginal mesh in the Pelvic Floor Pathology Unit at the Hospital Universitario de Caracas. Methods: Retrospective and descriptive study. We included patients with pelvic organ prolapse treated with transvagynal mesh between January 2010 and December 2011, and with a follow up of 12 months (N=49). Results: The mean age was 57 ± 5 years, and the mean body mass index was 27 kg/m². A 50,9 % of pelvic organ prolapse were grade II, 37,7 % were grade III, and 9,4 % were grade IV. Among grade II prolapse, 90 % were anterior, 7 % posterior and 3 % apical. Among grade III prolapse, 58 % were anterior, 37.% posterior and 5 % apical. Complications were observed in 66,8 % of the cases. The most common complication was vaginal erosion (25 %), followed by dyspareunia and vaginal shortening (10,4 % both of them). The novo urgency was observed in 6,3 % of the cases, and de novo urinary stress incontinence in 4,2.%. Hematoma, vesicovaginal fistula, and voiding dysfunction were observed in 2,1 %. The objective cure was 95,7 % at 1 year of follow-up. A 4,3 % of recurrence and 12,5 % of de novo prolapse were observed. Conclusion: Vaginal meshes are a safe and effective alternative in pelvic organ prolapse treatment. Complications are frequent, but most of them are mild. However, the high incidence of vaginal erosion can affect the quality of life of most patients.

Outcome of posterior transvaginal mesh kit / 대한산부인과내시경학회지

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to report outcomes of apical and posterior pelvic organ prolapse repair using posterior transvaginal mesh kit. METHODS: Thirty four consecutive patients with apical or posterior pelvic organ prolapse over pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) stage 2 were repaired by posterior transvaginal mesh kit at the Korea University Guro Hospital between July 2007 and June 2011. Postoperative follow-up visits were scheduled at 1, 6 months after surgery, with question about side effects and POP-Q exam. RESULTS: Thirty four consecutive patients who underwent posterior transvaginal mesh kit had completed 6 month follow up. The demographics are the mean age 65.9+/-8.6 years, the mean body mass index 26.4+/-3.0 kg/m2 and the mean parity 3.6+/-1.5. Overall anatomic cure rates of apical pelvic organ prolapse and rectocele were 91.7%, 92.6%, respectively. The Ap, Bp scores improved significantly after operation (p<0.01). No patient presented healing abnormality. CONCLUSION: Posterior transvaginal mesh kit is effective and safe for treatment of apical and posterior pelvic organ prolapse.