RESUMO
Resumen OBJETIVO: Determinar los factores asociados con una prueba de trabajo de parto después de una cesárea exitosa en mujeres sin antecedente de parto previo. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Estudio observacional de casos y controles, longitudinal, retrospectivo y analítico efectuado en pacientes atendidas entre el 2017 y 2020 en el Hospital Ángeles Lomas, con embarazo único de más de 37 semanas, con una prueba de trabajo de parto, con una cesárea previa y sin parto previo. Se compararon las variables independientes entre el grupo que logró una prueba exitosa de trabajo de parto después de cesárea con las del grupo con prueba fallida. Para el análisis estadístico se utilizó el programa SPSS de IBM, versión 21. Todas las variables categóricas se expresan en frecuencias y porcentajes. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 135 pacientes con prueba de trabajo de parto después de cesárea de las que 65 (48.1%) tuvieron parto (prueba exitosa) y 70 (51.8%) cesárea (prueba fallida). Hubo una mayor proporción de trabajo de parto espontáneo en el grupo con prueba exitosa en comparación con el grupo con prueba fallida (66.2% en comparación con 37.1%). No hubo diferencias significativas en cuanto a la conducción del trabajo de parto, integridad de membranas amnióticas al ingreso, horas de trabajo de parto y peso al nacer. CONCLUSIONES: Un índice de masa corporal menor, un trabajo de parto espontáneo y una mayor dilatación al ingreso se asociaron, significativamente, con una prueba exitosa de trabajo de parto después de cesárea. La integridad de las membranas, la duración de la prueba y el peso al nacer no tuvieron diferencias significativas entre los grupos.
Abstract OBJECTIVE: To determine the factors associated with a trial of labor after a successful cesarean section in women with no history of previous delivery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Observational case-control, longitudinal, retrospective, analytical, retrospective study performed in patient attended between 2017 and 2020 at Hospital Ángeles Lomas, with a singleton pregnancy of more than 37 weeks, with a trial of labor, with a previous cesarean section and no history of previous delivery. The independent variables were compared between the group that achieved a successful trial of labor after cesarean section with those of the group with failed trial. For statistical analysis, the IBM SPSS program, version 21, was used. All categorical variables are expressed in frequencies and percentages. RESULTS: We included 135 patients with trial of labor after cesarean section of whom 65 (48.1%) had labor (successful trial) and 70 (51.8%) had cesarean section (failed trial). There was a higher proportion of spontaneous labor in the successful trial group compared to the failed trial group (66.2% compared to 37.1%). There were no significant differences in labor conduction, amniotic membrane integrity on admission, hours of labor, and birth weight. CONCLUSIONS: Lower body mass index, spontaneous labor, and greater dilation on admission were significantly associated with a successful trial of labor after cesarean section. Membrane integrity, length of trial, and birth weight had no significant differences between groups.
RESUMO
Objective To study bacterial conditions in amniotic cavity of the third trimester and the delivery. Methods Patients underwent cesarean section due to various reasons were randomly enrolled in the study. Ten ml aqua amnii taken from using aspesis were cultured and the bacteria were identified and tested for drug sensitivity. All patients were not treated with antibiotics before and during operation,conventional antibiotics treatnent was used after operation. The patients were divided into 3 groups based on their status: 34 cases of premature rupture of membrane ( PROM ), thirty-four cases of labor without PROM, and 27 cases of pregnancy without PROM. The positive rate, species , distribution and drug sensitivity of bacteria in the 3 groups were analyzed. Results The positive rate was 61.8% (21/34) in PROM ,52. 9% ( 18/34 ) in labor without PROM,11.1% (3/27)in pregnancy without PROM. The positive rates were significantly different among the 3 groups (x2 = 17.29 ,P =0.000). However, there was no significant difference between the labor without PROM group and the pregnancy without PROM group ( x2 = 0.541 , P = 0.462 ). Staphylococcus epidermidis was the most common isolated bacteria, following by staphylococcus aureas, streptococcus, colon bacillus, and pseudomonas. There were no significant differences of bacterial species between labor without PROM and pregnancy without PROM( x2 = 11.9,P =0.535 ). The relative higher positive rate in the labor without PROM and PROM indicated that they were important inducement of bacteria infection. There were no significant difference on positive rate and bacteria species distribution between the PROM and labor without PROM group,which suggested that up-bound along vagina to amniotic cavity was the most common route of infection. Sensitive antibiotics should be given to the patients of PROM and labor without PROM targeted at staphylococcus,streptococcus, colon bacillus and monad. Antibiotics such as Cephems, Penicillins and Clindamycin were sensitive to various bacteria and safe to both mother and baby, thus were recommended. Quinupristin, Vancomycin,Furantoin, Fusidic ,Teicoplanin, Amikacin and Meropenem were also sensitive to various bacteria, but due to their side effects and the principle of ladder antibiotics using, they were recommended as second line antibiotics. Conclutions Up-bound along vagina to amniotic cavity is the most common route of infection. For rupture of membrane and labor without PROM patients, antibiotics should be given, and strict aseptic technique,washing cavity and incision, using antibiotics after operation are necessary to prevent infection.