Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Chinese Journal of Ultrasonography ; (12): 661-667, 2021.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-910105

RESUMO

Objective:To investigate the value of left ventricular opacification (LVO) for measuring left ventricular (LV) remodeling parameters in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients.Methods:Sixty-nine STEMI patients in Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University from April 2018 to December 2019 were enrolled. The apical four-chamber, three-chamber and two-chamber views of LV were collected with unenhanced and contrast-enhanced modes. According to the endocardium display in the unenhanced mode, all patients were divided into two groups: excellent image quality group ( n=23) and poor image quality group ( n=46). The endocardial segment display rate and mural thrombus diagnosis rate were compared between the two groups, and the improvement of LV overall image quality and LV apex display were evaluated in the poor image quality group.LV end diastolic volume (LVEDV), LV end systolic volume (LVESV), LV ejection fraction (LVEF) and LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) were measured with unenhanced and contrast-enhanced modes, respectively. The differences and repeatability of LV remodeling measurements of LVEDV, LVESV, LVEF and GLS in each group were compared with unenhanced and contrast-enhanced modes, and the feasibility and accuracy of GLS in contrast-enhanced mode were evaluated. Results:①Regardless of the image quality in the unenhanced mode, the display rate of endocardial segment in the contrast-enhanced mode was higher than that in the unenhanced mode (all P<0.05). ②For the poor image quality group, the overall image quality of LV and the display of LV apex were significantly improved in the contrast-enhanced mode (all P<0.05). ③For the poor image quality group, LVESV in contrast-enhanced mode was higher, while LVEF and GLS were lower than those in the unenhanced mode (all P<0.05). ④The correlation between GLS measured in contrast-enhanced and unenhanced mode was 0.912, and most of the measurements in the two modes were within the consistency threshold. For the poor image quality group, compared with GLS measured in the unenhanced mode, the correlation between GLS and LVEF measured in the contrast-enhanced mode was higher (0.731 vs 0.709). ⑤For the excellent image quality group, the interclass correlation coefficients (ICC) of most parameters were increased slightly in the contrast-enhanced mode, especially among interobservers. For the poor image quality group, the intra- and inter-observers′ ICC of LV remodeling mearsurements were increased significantly in the contrast-enhanced mode. Conclusions:LVO can more clearly display the LV structure of STEMI patients and obtain more repeatable LV remodeling measurements such as LVEDV, LVESV, LVEF and GLS, especially for patients with poor image quality.

2.
Chinese Journal of Ultrasonography ; (12): 1082-1088, 2019.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-824462

RESUMO

Objective To investigate the accuracy and repeatability of contrast-enhanced transthoracic echocardiography for measurements of right ventricular structure and function.Methods The apical four-chamber views and the three-dimensional full-volume images of the right heart were collected from 12 beagles with unenhanced and contrast-enhanced transthoracic echocardiography.The intimal display rate of the right ventricular segments,right ventricular end diastolic longitudinal dimension (RVLD),right ventricular end diastolic area (RVEDA),right ventricular end systolic area (RVESA) and right ventricular fractional area change (RVFAC) were evaluated respectively with two-dimensional unenhanced and contrast-enhanced echocardiography.Right ventricular three-dimensional full-volume images were processed and analyzed by TomTec software,and right ventricular end diastolic volume (RVEDV),right ventricular end systolic volume (RVESV) and right ventricular ej ection fraction (RVEF) were measured respectively with three-dimensional unenhanced and contrast-enhanced echocardiography. The measurements of pathological specimen were taken as the gold standard,the accuracies of measuring RVEDVand RVLD by different methods were evaluated.All indexes were measured repeatedly by the same observer and different observers to assess the intraobserver and interobserver reproducibilities of different methods.Results ①The intimal display rate of the right ventricular segments was higher with contrast-enhanced echocardiography than that with unenhanced echocardiography (P <0.05).②The measurements of RVEDV by three-dimensional contrast-enhanced echocardiography correlated well with the measurements by anatomical specimens.And the correlation was higher(0.916 vs 0.843),the consistency was better than that by unenhanced echocardiography.The measurements of RVLD by two-dimensional contrast-enhanced echocardiography correlated well with the measurements by anatomical specimens.And the correlation was higher (0.928 vs 0.850),the consistency was better than that by unenhanced echocardiography.③For inter-and intraobservers reproducibilities,the interclass correlation coefficients of RVLD,RVEDV,RVESV, RVEF,RVEDA,RVESA,RVFAC with contrast-enhanced echocardiography were higher and 95%confidence interval ranges were smaller than those with unenhanced echocardiography. Conclusions Contrast-enhanced transthoracic echocardiography can improve the accuracy and repeatability for measurements of right ventricular structure and function,providing a new evaluation method for patients with poor image quality of the right ventricle in clinical practice.

3.
Chinese Journal of Ultrasonography ; (12): 1082-1088, 2019.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-800524

RESUMO

Objective@#To investigate the accuracy and repeatability of contrast-enhanced transthoracic echocardiography for measurements of right ventricular structure and function.@*Methods@#The apical four-chamber views and the three-dimensional full-volume images of the right heart were collected from 12 beagles with unenhanced and contrast-enhanced transthoracic echocardiography. The intimal display rate of the right ventricular segments, right ventricular end diastolic longitudinal dimension (RVLD), right ventricular end diastolic area (RVEDA), right ventricular end systolic area (RVESA) and right ventricular fractional area change (RVFAC) were evaluated respectively with two-dimensional unenhanced and contrast-enhanced echocardiography. Right ventricular three-dimensional full-volume images were processed and analyzed by TomTec software, and right ventricular end diastolic volume (RVEDV), right ventricular end systolic volume (RVESV) and right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) were measured respectively with three-dimensional unenhanced and contrast-enhanced echocardiography. The measurements of pathological specimen were taken as the gold standard, the accuracies of measuring RVEDVand RVLD by different methods were evaluated. All indexes were measured repeatedly by the same observer and different observers to assess the intraobserver and interobserver reproducibilities of different methods.@*Results@#①The intimal display rate of the right ventricular segments was higher with contrast-enhanced echocardiography than that with unenhanced echocardiography (P<0.05). ②The measurements of RVEDV by three-dimensional contrast-enhanced echocardiography correlated well with the measurements by anatomical specimens. And the correlation was higher (0.916 vs 0.843), the consistency was better than that by unenhanced echocardiography. The measurements of RVLD by two-dimensional contrast-enhanced echocardiography correlated well with the measurements by anatomical specimens. And the correlation was higher (0.928 vs 0.850), the consistency was better than that by unenhanced echocardiography. ③For inter- and intraobservers reproducibilities, the interclass correlation coefficients of RVLD, RVEDV, RVESV, RVEF, RVEDA, RVESA, RVFAC with contrast-enhanced echocardiography were higher and 95% confidence interval ranges were smaller than those with unenhanced echocardiography.@*Conclusions@#Contrast-enhanced transthoracic echocardiography can improve the accuracy and repeatability for measurements of right ventricular structure and function, providing a new evaluation method for patients with poor image quality of the right ventricle in clinical practice.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA