Posterior Direct Decompression and Fusion of the Lower Thoracic and Lumbar Fractures with Neurological Deficit

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study. PURPOSE: To analyze the treatment outcome of patients with lower thoracic and lumbar fractures combined with neurological deficits. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Although various methods of the surgical treatment for lower thoracic and lumbar fractures are used, there has been no surgical treatment established as a superior option than others. METHODS: Between March 2001 and August 2009, this study enrolled 13 patients with lower thoracic and lumbar fractures who underwent spinal canal decompression by removing posteriorly displaced bony fragments via the posterior approach and who followed up for more than a year. We analyzed the difference between the preoperative and postoperative extents of canal encroachment, degrees of neurologic deficits and changes in the local kyphotic angle. RESULTS: The average age of the patients was 37 years. There were 10 patients with unstable burst factures and 3 patients with translational injuries. Canal encroachment improved from preoperative average of 84% to 9% postoperatively. Local kyphosis also improved from 20.5degrees to 1.5degrees. In 92% (12/13) of the patients, neurologic deficit improved more than Frankel grade 1 and an average improvement of 1.7 grade was observed. Deterioration of neurologic symptoms was not observed. Although some loss of reduction of kyphotic deformity was observed at the final follow-up, serious complications were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: When posteriorly displaced bony fragments were removed by the posterior approach, neurological recovery could be facilitated by adequate decompression without serious complications. The posterior direct decompression could be used as one of treatments for lower thoracic and lumbar fractures combined with neurologic injuries.

The Impact on Clinical Results by Sagittal Imbalance in Posterior Fixation for Thoraco-lumbar Burst Fractures

PURPOSE: Evaluate the effects of sagittal imbalance on the clinical outcomes in thoracolumbar burst fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 11 patients who had received posterior fixation for unstable burst fractures. Radiologic assessment including the compression ratio, focal kyphotic angle and sagittal balance were obtained. The clinical outcomes were assessed by ODI, VAS and SF-36. We subdivided the patients into sagittal balance and imbalance group, and compared with clinical outcomes. The relationship between radiologic and clinical outcomes was examined using correlation analysis. RESULTS: The radiologic assessment were changed on preoperative and postoperative as follows: mean compression ratio: 15.2%, 4.9%, mean focal kyphotic angle: 43.2degrees, 20.9degrees. The mean sagittal balance was 11.5 cm. The mean score of VAS, ODI, Physical and Mental Component Summary of SF-36 were 3.7, 45.8, 43.3 and 39.8, respectively. The ODI was significantly higher in sagittal imbalance group, and SF-36 was significantly higher in sagittal balance group (p<0.05). The VAS was correlated with compression ratio and focal kyphotic angle. The ODI and Mental Component Summary of SF-36 were correlated with sagittal imbalance. CONCLUSION: Sagittal balance effects on the functions of spine, surgical treatment should be carefully considered with unstable burst fractures.

The Analysis of Prognostic Factors on Unstable Burst Fracture on the Thoracolumbar Spine / 대한척추외과학회지

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective clinical and radiological analysis OBJECTIVES: To determine the relationship between the classifications of unstable burst fractures on the thoracolumbar region, radiologic studies, signal change area on MRA and analysis of the prognostic factors. SUMMARY OF LITERATURE REVIEW: MRI is the first imaging modality that visualizes the extent of spinal cord derangement directly and it has the potential to provide an accurate diagnosis and prognosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From March 1998 to September 2006, 39 patients who were eligible for a follow up of more than 1 year with an unstable burst fracture on the thoracolumbar region were studied. With these cases, The size of the bone fragment at the initial injury, signal change area on MRI, time to surgery, reduction rate of the bone fragments, recovery of the posterior curvature of the vertebrae and height of the vertebral body were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean fracture size rate, average time to surgery, reduction rate of bone fragment and the recovery rate of the height of the vertebral body was 46.1+/-12.8%, 17+/-4.5 hours, 35.2+/-10.1%, and 57.9+/-17.4%, respectively. The data shows that the time elapsed until surgery had no relationship with the prognosis (P=0.317). Injuries with broad signal changes on MRI were not associated with the reduction rate of bone fragments, recovery of posterior curvature of the vertebrae and the height of the vertebral body. CONCLUSIONS: In unstable burst fractures of the thoracolumbar region, although a comparison of the prognostic factors on simple X-ray film had no significance, it still has significant meaning when correlated with the signals on MRI.

Bone Cement Augmentation of Short Segment Fixation for Unstable Burst Fracture in Severe Osteoporosis

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of short segment fixation following postural reduction for the re-expansion and stabilization of unstable burst fractures in patients with osteoporosis. METHODS: Twenty patients underwent short segment fixation following postural reduction using a soft roll at the involved vertebra in cases of severely collapsed vertebrae of more than half their original height. All patients had unstable burst fracture with canal compromise, but their motor power was intact. The surgical procedure included postural reduction for 2 days and bone cement-augmented pedicle screw fixations at one level above, one level below and the fractured level itself. Imaging and clinical findings, including the level of the vertebra involved, vertebral height restoration, injected cement volume, local kyphosis, clinical outcome and complications were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 15 months. The mean pain score (visual analogue scale) prior to surgery was 8.1, which decreased to 2.8 at 7 days after surgery. The kyphotic angle improved significantly from 21.6+/-5.8degrees before surgery to 5.2+/-3.7degrees after surgery. The fraction of the height of the vertebra increased from 35% and 40% to 70% in the anterior and middle portion. There were no signs of hardware pull-out, cement leakage into the spinal canal or aggravation of kyphotic deformities. CONCLUSION: In the management of unstable burst fracture in patients with severe osteoporosis, short segment pedicle screw fixation with bone cement augmentation following postural reduction can be used to reduce the total levels of pedicle screw fixation and to correct kyphotic deformities.

Relevancy of Posterior Column Injury and Dural Tear in Unstable Burst Fracture

PURPOSE: To analyze the pattern of posterior column injury in unstable burst fractures and to predict the possibility of dural injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review was carried out on 22 patients of unstable burst fracture from Nov. 1996 to Sep. 2003. The pattern posterior column injury was analyzed by simple x-ray, CT and MRI findings. In simple x-ray, authors analyzed laminar fracture, posterior facet injury, inter-spinous widening and inter-spinous malalignment, posterior bony injury by CT, posterior inter-spinous ligament injury and dural tear by MRI. The statistical analysis was performed using Mann-Whitney test and Chi-square test. RESULTS: There were 13 men and 9 women, and mean age was 41 years-old (18~65). The level of injury showed 15 cases in T12-L2, 6 in L3, 3 L4. In simple x-ray, findings were showed 13 cases (59.1%) in laminar fracture, 7 (31.8%) in posterior facet injury, 16 (72.7%) in inter-spinous widening and 8 (36.4%) in inter-spinous malalignment. In CT, findings were showed 13 (59.1%) in laminar fracture, 10 (45.5%) in posterior facet injury, 9 (40.9%) in transverse process fracture. In MRI, findings were showed 18 (81.8%) in posterior inter-spinous ligament injury and were not showed dural tear. The combined cases of posterior bony and ligamentous injury was 6 (27%) and 5 of 6 showed dural tear and the analysis of dural tear and radiologic findings was showed positive correlation (p=0.004). CONCLUSION: Posterior ligament injury was more frequent than bony injury in unstable burst fracture. Among the posterior bony injuries, dural tear was more frequent in facet injury. Authors confirmed all dural tear with operation. In cases of posterior bony injury combined with ligamentous injuries, the possibility of dural tear was significantly higher than that of single structural injury (p=0.004).

Comparative Analysis of Unstable Burst Fracture According to the Methodology of Surgical Treatment / 대한척추외과학회지

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of the results of various methodologies for the surgical treatment of an unstable burst fracture with posterior column injuries. OBJECTIVES: To compare the radiological and clinical results in unstable burst fractures, treated with various surgical methodologies (anterior, posterior and combined fusion), and to confirm their efficacy. LITERATURE REVIEW SUMMARY: Many authors recommended various surgical methods for the treatment of an unstable burst fracture, and of these, combined fusion is recommended for the preservation of stability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of results was carried out on 22 patients, confirmed with an unstable burst fracture associated with a posterior column injury, between Nov. 1996 and Mar. 2003. The preoperative plane x-ray, CT and MRI, and the last postoperative follow up plane X-ray and CT, in 22 unstable burst fracture patients, were reviewed. The authors looked for laminar fracture, facet injury and inter-spinous widening in the plane x-ray, canal compromise on the CT, and a posterior ligament injury and dural tear on the MRI. The neurological injury was evaluated using the Bardford and McBride criteria and the clinical result with the Denis' pain and work scale. RESULTS: In the anterior fusion group, the radiological findings showed 3 laminar fractures, 2 facet injuries, 7 inter-spinous widening and 8 posterior ligament injuries. In the posterior fusion group, they showed 5 laminar fractures, 4 facet injuries, 5 inter-spinous widening and 5 posterior ligament injuries. In the combined fusion group, they showed 5 laminar fractures, 4 facet injuries, 4 inter-spinous widening and 5 posterior ligament injuries. The average canal compromise was 54.3% in cases of anterior fusion, 20.9% of posterior fusion and 74% of the combined fusion groups. A dural tear was found in 1 each of the anterior and posterior and 4 of the combined group. From the clinical results, improvements of the neurology in the anterior, posterior and combined groups were 2.0, 1.7 and 1.3 degrees, respectively. From the Denis' pain & work scale better than good degrees were shown in 3 of the anterior, 4 of the posterior and 2 of the combined groups. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, there were no differences in the improvements of the neurology and clinical results according to the surgical methodology employed. However, the use of combined fusion is recommended for the preservation of stability in an unstable burst fracture with combined posterior ligament and bony injuries as well as with severe canal compromise.

Comparative Analysis of Unstable Burst Fracture According to the Methodology of Surgical Treatment / 대한척추외과학회지

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of the results of various methodologies for the surgical treatment of an unstable burst fracture with posterior column injuries. OBJECTIVES: To compare the radiological and clinical results in unstable burst fractures, treated with various surgical methodologies (anterior, posterior and combined fusion), and to confirm their efficacy. LITERATURE REVIEW SUMMARY: Many authors recommended various surgical methods for the treatment of an unstable burst fracture, and of these, combined fusion is recommended for the preservation of stability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of results was carried out on 22 patients, confirmed with an unstable burst fracture associated with a posterior column injury, between Nov. 1996 and Mar. 2003. The preoperative plane x-ray, CT and MRI, and the last postoperative follow up plane X-ray and CT, in 22 unstable burst fracture patients, were reviewed. The authors looked for laminar fracture, facet injury and inter-spinous widening in the plane x-ray, canal compromise on the CT, and a posterior ligament injury and dural tear on the MRI. The neurological injury was evaluated using the Bardford and McBride criteria and the clinical result with the Denis' pain and work scale. RESULTS: In the anterior fusion group, the radiological findings showed 3 laminar fractures, 2 facet injuries, 7 inter-spinous widening and 8 posterior ligament injuries. In the posterior fusion group, they showed 5 laminar fractures, 4 facet injuries, 5 inter-spinous widening and 5 posterior ligament injuries. In the combined fusion group, they showed 5 laminar fractures, 4 facet injuries, 4 inter-spinous widening and 5 posterior ligament injuries. The average canal compromise was 54.3% in cases of anterior fusion, 20.9% of posterior fusion and 74% of the combined fusion groups. A dural tear was found in 1 each of the anterior and posterior and 4 of the combined group. From the clinical results, improvements of the neurology in the anterior, posterior and combined groups were 2.0, 1.7 and 1.3 degrees, respectively. From the Denis' pain & work scale better than good degrees were shown in 3 of the anterior, 4 of the posterior and 2 of the combined groups. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, there were no differences in the improvements of the neurology and clinical results according to the surgical methodology employed. However, the use of combined fusion is recommended for the preservation of stability in an unstable burst fracture with combined posterior ligament and bony injuries as well as with severe canal compromise.

One Stage Decompression and Circumferential Stabilization by Posterior Approach in the Unstable Burst Fracture of Thoracolumbar and Lumbar Spine

OBJECTIVE: It has been known that the posterior pedicle screw fixation provides good mechanical stability in unstable burst fracture. But, posterior fixation without anterior column support may not be adequate to withstand the axial load and to keep the corrected kyphotic angle. We present results of one stage fixation by posterior approach in unstable burst fracture. METHODS: Nine patients with unstable burst fracture were treated with posterior fixation and intervertebral fusion using titanium mesh cages and pedicle screws. The canal decompression was achieved by laminectomy and partial pediculectomy through the posterior approach. In all cases, the short segment fixation and anterior column support with cage were performed on the one stage operation. RESULTS: Of nine patients, seven was satisfied with excellent clinical results except two cases of the Frankel's grade A. All patients had good stabilization of spinal column and enough decompression without any neurological complications. It was possible to maintain the corrected kyphotic angle with the circumferential stabilization(three column fixation). CONCLUSION: The anterior and posterior column fixation through the posterior approach provides good stability and decompression in the patients with unstable burst fracture.