Surgery in Patients with Von Willebrand Disease : A Single Center Experience / 임상소아혈액종양

BACKGROUND: Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder. Surgery, even relatively minor procedures, in patients with moderate to severe qualitative and quantitative deficiencies of von Willebrand factor (VWF) can be associated with a life-threatening risk of excessive bleeding. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of VWF/FVIII in patients with von Willebrand disease before surgery and determine the efficacy of VWF/FVIII.METHODS: We reviewed the results of surgical procedures in patients with VWD at Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, between September 2009 and January 2016. VWF/FVIII concentrates were administrated preoperatively to all patients.RESULTS: Between September 2009 and January 2016 at our center, eight surgical procedures were performed successfully and no severe complications were observed in the seven patients with VWD. Four orthopedic procedures, one laparoscopic appendectomy, one ovary cystectomy, one strabotomy, and one dental extraction were performed. The median duration of hospitalization was seven days. VWF/FVIII concentrates were administered prior to all procedures, including the dental extraction. In all cases, uncontrolled bleeding and thromboembolic complications were not observed.CONCLUSION: Patients with VWD who require surgery can be treated efficiently and safely with VWF/FVIII concentrates. There is excellent tolerance, efficacy and safety in preventing excessive bleeding during surgery. When administering VWF/FVIII concentrates, treatment should be monitored with VWF Ag, VWF:RCo and FVIII plasma levels.

Surgery in Patients with Von Willebrand Disease : A Single Center Experience / 임상소아혈액종양

BACKGROUND: Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder. Surgery, even relatively minor procedures, in patients with moderate to severe qualitative and quantitative deficiencies of von Willebrand factor (VWF) can be associated with a life-threatening risk of excessive bleeding. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of VWF/FVIII in patients with von Willebrand disease before surgery and determine the efficacy of VWF/FVIII. METHODS: We reviewed the results of surgical procedures in patients with VWD at Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, between September 2009 and January 2016. VWF/FVIII concentrates were administrated preoperatively to all patients. RESULTS: Between September 2009 and January 2016 at our center, eight surgical procedures were performed successfully and no severe complications were observed in the seven patients with VWD. Four orthopedic procedures, one laparoscopic appendectomy, one ovary cystectomy, one strabotomy, and one dental extraction were performed. The median duration of hospitalization was seven days. VWF/FVIII concentrates were administered prior to all procedures, including the dental extraction. In all cases, uncontrolled bleeding and thromboembolic complications were not observed. CONCLUSION: Patients with VWD who require surgery can be treated efficiently and safely with VWF/FVIII concentrates. There is excellent tolerance, efficacy and safety in preventing excessive bleeding during surgery. When administering VWF/FVIII concentrates, treatment should be monitored with VWF Ag, VWF:RCo and FVIII plasma levels.

Hemorragias mayores asociadas a cirugía en pacientes con enfermedad de Von Willebrand leve / Major haemorrhages associated with surgery in patients with mild von Willebrand disease

Introducción: Los pacientes con enfermedad de von Willebrand frecuentemente sangran frente a desafíos hemostáticos. Objetivos: Nuestro propósito fue identificar marcadores predictivos de hemorragia mayor en cirugías en pacientes con las variantes tipo 1 y posible tipo 1 de la enfermedad. Material y Métodos: Se registraron las hemorragias mayores en cirugías anteriores al diagnóstico y los parámetros de laboratorio en 311 pacientes. Éstos se agruparon de acuerdo con la ausencia (grupo A) o presencia (grupo B) de hemorragia mayor en cirugías. Resultados: Presentaron hemorragia mayor el 26 por ciento de los pacientes y 17,5 por ciento de las cirugías. No hubo diferencias en el porcentaje de pacientes tipo 1 (32,6 por ciento) y posible tipo 1 (24,8 por ciento) que tuvieron hemorragia mayor. Tampoco se observaron diferencias en la prevalencia del grupo sanguíneo O, edad, género, historia familiar y niveles de FVIII y VW entre los grupos A y B. La hemorragia post exodoncia fue el antecedente clínico más frecuente (P<0,000; RR=2,11; IC 95 por ciento = 1,3-3,5) y podría definir riesgo de hemorragias mayores. El bleeding score y el número de sitios de sangrado no resultaron predictivos de hemorragias mayores. Las cesáreas (24,6 por ciento) y adenoamigdalectomías (22,3 por ciento) fueron las cirugías con mayor frecuencia de hemorragias mayores. Conclusión: Los pacientes con VWD tipo 1 y posible tipo 1 mostraron similar incidencia de hemorragia mayor en cirugías. Los niveles de FVIII y VWF, el tiempo de sangría, historia familiar y grupo sanguíneo no resultaron efectivos como marcadores predictivos de hemorragia mayor. Sin embargo, el antecedente de sangrado post exodoncia y el tipo de cirugía a llevar a cabo (cesáreas y adenoamigdalectomías) en pacientes con enfermedad de von Willebrand tipo 1 y posible tipo 1 parecen importantes como marcadores de riesgo.

Introduction: Patients with von Willebrand disease frequently bleed under haemostatic challenges. Objectives: The aim of our study was to identify predictive markers of perioperative major haemorrhage in type 1 and possible type 1 patients von Willebrand disease. Material and Methods: We recorded perioperative bleeding complications previous to diagnosis and laboratory parameters in 311 patients. They were grouped according to the absence (group A) or presence (group B) of perioperative major haemorrhage. Results: Twenty-six per cent of patients and 17.5 per cent of surgical procedures presented major haemorrhage. There was no difference neither between percentages of type 1 (32.6 per cent) and possible type 1 patients (24.8 per cent) who had major haemorrhage nor in the prevalence of O blood group, age, gender, family history and levels of FVIII and VWF, between group A and B. A history of bleeding after tooth extraction was the most frequent clinical feature (P<0.000; RR=2.11; CI 95 per cent = 1.3-3.5) observed in patients with major haemorrhage, and could defi ne risk factor. The bleeding score and the number of bleeding sites were not predictors of major haemorrhages. Caesarean sections (24.6 per cent) and adeno-tonsillectomies (22.3 per cent) showed the highest frequency of major haemorrhage. Conclusion: Type 1 and possible type 1 VWD patients showed similar incidence of perioperative major haemorrhage. The levels of FVIII and VWF, the bleeding time, blood group and family history did not prove to be effective as predictive markers of major haemorrhage. However, the personal history of bleeding after tooth extraction and the type of surgery (caesarean section and adeno-tonsillectomies) in patients with either type 1 or possible type 1 von Willebrand disease shown to be important in determining risk.