Long-term efficacy of endoscopic transluminal drainage for acute pancreatitis complicated with walled-off necrosis or pancreatic pseudocyst / 中华消化内镜杂志

Objective:To evaluate the long-term efficacy of endoscopic transluminal drainage(ETD) for acute pancreatitis complicated with walled-off necrosis (WON) or pancreatic pseudocyst (PPC).Methods:A total of 79 patients who were diagnosed as having WON or PPC by abdominal CT or ultrasound and treated with ETD in Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital were enrolled. Past medical records and follow-up by phone call after discharge were analyzed for long-term outcomes including endocrine and exocrine functions and long-term quality of life.Results:A total of 50 patients were enrolled, including 31 patients with infected WON/PPC and 19 patients with uninfected WON/PPC. Seventeen patients (54.84%) in the infected WON/PPC group and 11 patients (57.89%) in the uninfected WON/PPC group lost 5% or more of their weight. There were no significant differences in the proportion of cases of weight loss of 5% or more ( P=0.833), or the weight loss between the two groups (12.59±8.89 kg VS 10.91±2.47 kg, P=0.522). Only one patient in the infected WON/PPC group had chronic abdominal pain. There was no significant difference in the Izbicki score between the two groups (23.79±6.74 VS 22.03±3.21, P=0.295). None of the patients developed steatorrhea after discharge. Five patients (16.67%, 5/30) in the infected WON/PPC group and 6 patients (40.00%, 6/15) in the uninfected WON/PPC group developed endocrine insufficiency with no significant difference ( P=0.140). Greater risk of secondary diabetes resulted from higher low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ( HR=1.9, 95% CI: 1.0-3.4, P=0.044)and triglycerides ( HR=1.2, 95% CI: 1.0-1.3, P =0.029). Conclusion:ETD is safe and effective for WON and PPC. But there is possibility that patients develop secondary diabetes. Additionally, greater risk of secondary diabetes results from higher low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides.

A comparative study of lumen-apposing metal stent and plastic stent for the treatment of pancreatic walled-off necrosis / 中华消化内镜杂志

Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) for the treatment of pancreatic walled-off necrosis (WON).Methods:A retrospective cohort study was performed on data of 43 consecutive patients with pancreatic WON who underwent endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage by LAMS or plastic stents (PS) in Hangzhou First People's Hospital from December 2010 to June 2020. According to the type of stent used, the patients were divided into the LAMS group ( n=16) and the PS group ( n=27). The technical success rate, the clinical success rate, the operation time, the session of endoscopic necrosectomy, the stent insertion time and adverse events were compared between the two groups. Results:All 43 patients were successfully stented, indicating a technical success rate of 100% in both groups. For the LAMS group, the clinical success rate, the operation time, the session of endoscopic necrosectomy, the stent insertion time and overall incidence of adverse events were 75.0% (12/16), 26.0 (19.1, 39.8) min, 0.5 (0, 2.0) times, (41.3±28.4) days, and 43.7% (7/16), respectively, whereas these indices of the PS group were 37.0% (10/27) ( χ2=5.795, P=0.016), 31.0 (26.0, 48.0) min ( Z=1.221, P=0.222), 0 (0, 0) times ( Z=2.245, P=0.025), (176.1±99.1) days ( t=5.187, P<0.001) and 14.8% (4/27) ( χ2=8.893, P=0.064), respectively. Conclusion:LAMS placement is safe and effective for the treatment of pancreatic WON with a higher clinical success rate compared with PS. However, it requires more endoscopic intervention.

A Study on Clinical Profile and Complications of Acute Pancreatitis at a Tertiary Care Centre, Ahmedabad: A Case-Series

Introduction: Acute pancreatitis accounts for 3% of all cases of abdominal pain among patients admitted to hospital in the UK. The prevalence of pancreatitis in India is 2.6-3.2 cases per 100,000. Major causes of acute pancreatitis are biliary calculi and alcohol abuse. Acute pancreatitis may be categorized as mild (interstitial oedematous pancreatitis), moderately severe acute pancreatitis or severe (necrotising pancreatitis). The majority of patients will have a mild attack of pancreatitis. Severe acute pancreatitis is seen in 5–10% of patients, and is characterized by pancreatic necrosis, a severe systemic inflammatory response and often multiorgan failure. Objective: To study Age, Sex distribution, Etiology, Clinical presentation & complications of Acute Pancreatitis. Methods: Retrospective Observational Study of 10 patients presenting to civil hospital, Ahmedabad OPD/Emergency department with complains of abdominal pain and showing acute pancreatitis on ultrasound or CT scan were included. Results: Out of 10 patients, 40% were from 50-59 year age group, 70% were males, 60% were Chronic Alcoholic, 50% had Pleural effusion, 80% had Ascites and 30% had Pancreatic necrosis. Conclusion: Acute Pancreatitis is common in adult males with Alcohol abuse and second common etiology being Gall stones. Common sequeae include Ascites and Pancreatic Necrosis

Seguridad y eficacia del drenaje guiado por endosonografía de colecciones pancreáticas usando prótesis plásticas y metálicas tipo LAMS / Safety and efficacy of EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections using plastic and lumen apposing metal stents (LAMS)

Background: Pancreatic fluid collections (PFC) are associated with severe acute pancreatitis. After maturation (after 4 weeks) they are classified as pancreatic pseudocyst (PP) and walled-off necrosis (WON). Endoscopic management is associated with lower morbidity and mortality compared with surgery. Aim: To describe the experience of EUS-guided drainage PFC drainage using plastic stent (PS) or metal stent (lumen apposing metal stents, or "LAMS"). Methods: Retrospective, observational study, between 2016-2019. Results: 17 patients in total. 8 cases were symptomatic PP and 9 were WON. Age 12-72 years. 12 cases in men. Indications: abdominal pain 5 cases and infection 11. The 8 cases of PFC were drained successfully using PS, without adverse effects. Regarding WON drainage, 3 cases were managed with PS and 6 with LAMS. In 5 cases, complementary endoscopic necrosectomy was required. A patient with LAMS required complementary surgical cleaning ("step-up") to treat collections far from the LAMS. Complications: one case of PS presented pigment occlusion with superinfection and another case presented migration to the stomach. Regarding LAMS, one case presented self-limited bleeding, another case presented obstruction of the stent with infection, which was managed endoscopically and with antibiotics. Conclusion: The endoscopic management of PFC is effective and safe, with plastic and metal stent (LAMS). The choice of type of stent depends on the characteristics of PFC (liquid vs solid), center experience and costs.

Introducción: Las colecciones pancreáticas (CP) se asocian a pancreatitis agudas graves. Luego de su maduración (después de las 4 semanas) se clasifican en pseudoquistes (PQ) y necrosis encapsulada (NE). El manejo endoscópico se asocia a menor morbimortalidad comparado con el quirúrgico. Objetivo: Describir la experiencia del drenaje de CP mediante el uso de prótesis plásticas (PP) o metálicas (lumen apposing metal stents, o "LAMS") mediante endosonografía. Método: Estudio retrospectivo, observacional, entre 2016-2018. Resultados: 17 pacientes en total. Ocho casos fueron PQ sintomáticos y 9 NE. Edad 12-72 años (12 casos en hombres). Indicaciones: dolor abdominal 5 casos e infección 11. Los 8 casos de PQ fueron drenados exitosamente con PP, sin efectos adversos. En relación con el drenaje de NE, 3 casos fueron manejados con PP y 6 con LAMS. En 5 casos se requirió necrosectomía endoscópica complementaria. Un paciente con LAMS requirió aseo quirúrgico complementario por colecciones alejadas al LAMS. En relación con las complicaciones, un caso de PP presentó oclusión del pigtail con sobreinfección y otro presentó migración al estómago. Respecto a LAMS, un caso presentó sangrado autolimitado y otro caso obstrucción de la prótesis con sobreinfección, que fue manejada endoscópicamente y con antibióticos. Conclusión: El manejo endoscópico de las CP es efectiva y segura, tanto con prótesis plásticas como metálicas (LAMS). La elección de la prótesis depende de las características de la lesión (líquido vs sólido), experiencia del centro y costos.

Outcomes of Infected versus Symptomatic Sterile Walled-Off Pancreatic Necrosis Treated with a Minimally Invasive Therapy

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Acute pancreatitis complicated by walled-off necrosis (WON) is associated with high morbidity and mortality, and if infected, typically necessitates intervention. Clinical outcomes of infected WON have been described as poorer than those of symptomatic sterile WON. With the evolution of minimally invasive therapy, we sought to compare outcomes of infected to symptomatic sterile WON. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study examining patients who were undergoing dual-modality drainage as minimally invasive therapy for WON at a high-volume tertiary pancreatic center. The main outcome measures included mortality with a drain in place, length of hospital stay, admission to intensive care unit, and development of pancreatic fistulae. RESULTS: Of the 211 patients in our analysis, 98 had infected WON. The overall mortality rate was 2.4%. Patients with infected WON trended toward higher mortality although not statistically significant (4.1% vs 0.9%, p=0.19). Patients with infected WON had longer length of hospitalization (29.8 days vs 17.3 days, p<0.01), and developed more spontaneous pancreatic fistulae (23.5% vs 7.8%, p<0.01). Multivariate analysis showed that infected WON was associated with higher odds of spontaneous pancreatic fistula formation (odds ratio, 2.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.20 to 5.85). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that infected WON has worse outcomes than sterile WON but also demonstrates that WON, once considered a significant cause of death, can be treated with good outcomes using minimally invasive therapy.

Value of lumen-apposing metal stent in the treatment of 27 cases with peripancreatic fluid accumulation in acute pancreatitis / 中华消化杂志

Objective To assess the application value of lumen-apposing,fully covered,self-expandable metal stent (LAMS) in the treatment of peripancreatic fluid collection (PFC).Methods From July 2015 to July 2017,at Drum Tower Hospital Affiliated to Medical School of Nanjing University,the patients with PFC who received LAMS under endoscopic ultrasound were enrolled.The inclusion criteria was the first treatment,age ≥ 18 years old,PFC diameter ＞ 6 cm and clinical manifestations of compression,or increased diameter of PFC after continuous observation,or signs of infection,course ＞four weeks,and the distance between the cyst wall and the digestive gastrointestinal wall less than 1 cm;exclude other pancreatic cystic lesions,such as serous cystic neoplasm,mucinous cystic neoplasm and solid pseudopapillary neoplasm.The clinical data of enrolled patients were retrospectively analyzed,and the efficacy and postoperative complication were summarized.Results A total of 27 patients with PFC were enrolled.All patients were successfully punctured and placed with LAMS.The percentage of complete drainage rate of PFC was 96.3％ (26/27).The median LAMS maintenance time was 26 days,with a range of four to 135 days.Seventeen patients received debridement treatment through LAMS,and the number of debridement treatment was (2.5± 1.3) times.Two patients underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and were placed with pancreatic stent,five patients received percutaneous drainage,and one patient underwent surgical drainage.Among 27 patients with PFC,eight patients (29.6％) coexisted with complications,including stent displacement in two cases,postoperative infection in three cases,perforation in two cases and bleeding in one case.They all improved after conservative treatment and none of them died.Conclusion LAMS is effective and relatively safe in the treatment of PFC,and may change the clinical treatment strategy of PFC.

Pancreatic Necrosectomy through Sinus Tract Endoscopy

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Direct endoscopic pancreatic necrosectomy is increasingly being utilized to treat infected or symptomatic walled-off necrosis (WON) located close to the stomach or duodenum. Laterally-placed WON has traditionally been treated surgically. We evaluated a less utilized technique of sinus tract endoscopy (STE) for symptomatic laterally-placed WON. METHODS: Two hundred seventy-six patients with acute pancreatitis admitted in our hospital, 32 had symptomatic or infected WON requiring intervention. Of the 12 patients with laterally placed WON, 10 were treated by STE. STE was performed with a standard adult gastroscope passed through a percutaneous tract created by the placement of a 32-Fr drain. RESULTS: Ten patients (7 males; mean age, 43.8 years) underwent STE. Mean number of sessions was 2.3 (range, 1–4), with mean time of 70 minutes for each session (range, 15–70 minutes). While 9 patients had complete success, 1 patient had fever and chose to undergo surgery. Two patients developed pneumoperitoneum, which was treated conservatively. There was no mortality, cutaneous fistula, or recurrence during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Laterally placed WON can be successfully managed by STE performed through a percutaneously placed drain. Details of the technique and end-points of STE require further evaluation.

Endoscopic transmural drainage and necrosectomy of walled-off pancreatic necrosis / 中国内镜杂志

Pancreatic necrosis (IPN) is a serious complication of acute pancreatitis (AP), with a mortality reported to be as great as 32.0%. At present, it is considered that patients with proven or suspected infected necrotizing pancreatitis, invasive intervention (i.e. percutaneous catheter drainage, endoscopic transluminal drainage/ necrosectomy, minimally invasive or open necrosectomy) should be delayed where possible until at least 4 weeks after initial presentation to allow the collection to become 'walled-off'. With the development of endoscopic technology, endoscopic transmural (stomach or duodenum) drainage and necrosectomy has been recommended as one of the preferred methods for walled-off necrosis. This article introduces the diagnosis and evaluation of the walled-off necrosis ; the indications, operation procedures, postoperative evaluation and management of postoperative complications of endoscopic transmural drainage and necrosectomy. At last, the research progress of endoscopic drainage and debridement in recent years was introduced.

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Management of Pancreatic Fluid Collections: Update and Review of the Literature

Severe acute pancreatitis is often complicated by the development of pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs), which may be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. It is crucial to accurately classify these collections as a pseudocyst or walled-off necrosis (WON) given significant differences in outcomes and management. Interventions for PFCs have increasingly shifted to less invasive strategies, with endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided methods being shown to be safer and equally effective as more invasive surgical techniques. In recent years, many new developments have improved the safety and efficacy of EUS-guided interventions, such as the introduction of lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS), direct endoscopic necrosectomy (DEN) and multiple other adjunctive techniques. Despite these developments, treatment of PFCs, and infected WON in particular, continues to be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. In this article, we discuss the EUS-guided management of PFCs while reviewing the latest developments and controversies in the field. We end by summarizing our own approach to managing PFCs.

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Transluminal Drainage for Peripancreatic Fluid Collections: Where Are We Now?

Endoscopic drainage for pancreatic and peripancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) has been increasingly used as a minimally invasive alternative to surgical or percutaneous drainage. Recently, endoscopic ultrasound-guided transluminal drainage (EUS-TD) has become the standard of care and a safe procedure for nonsurgical PFC treatment. EUS-TD ensures a safe puncture, avoiding intervening blood vessels. Single or multiple plastic stents (combined with a nasocystic catheter) were used for the treatment of PFCs for EUS-TD. More recently, the use of covered self-expandable metallic stents (CSEMSs) has provided a safer and more efficient approach route for internal drainage. We focused our review on the best approach and stent to use in endoscopic drainage for PFCs. We reviewed studies of EUS-TD for PFCs based on the original Atlanta Classification, including case reports, case series, and previous review articles. Data on clinical outcomes and adverse events were collected retrospectively. A total of 93 patients underwent EUS-TD of pancreatic pseudocysts using CSEMSs. The treatment success and adverse event rates were 94.6% and 21.1%, respectively. The majority of complications were of mild severity and resolved with conservative therapy. A total of 56 patients underwent EUS-TD using CSEMSs for pancreatic abscesses or infected walled-off necroses. The treatment success and adverse event rates were 87.8% and 9.5%, respectively. EUS-TD can be performed safely and efficiently for PFC treatment. Larger diameter CSEMSs without additional fistula tract dilation for the passage of a standard scope are needed to access and drain for PFCs with solid debris.