Evaluación de la capacidad de centrado y transporte apical de los sistemas Reciproc Blue y XP-endo Shaper / Evaluation of the centering and apical transport capacity of Reciproc Blue and XP-endo Shaper systems

Resumen Objetivo: Comparar la capacidad de centrado y el transporte apical de los sistemas Reciproc Blue y XP-endo Shaper en bloques de resina con fotografías pre y posoperatorias yuxtapuestas, mediante un programa de análisis de imágenes. Materiales y Métodos: Se dividieron al azar 20 tacos de resina en dos grupos (n=10) preparados con XP-endo Sha- per y Reciproc Blue respectivamente. Se tomaron fotografías digitales de los tacos, antes y después de la preparación con cada sistema en una misma posición. Luego las fotografías obtenidas fueron yuxtapuestas mediante el software Photo shop. Se midieron las desviaciones del centro del conducto con respecto a la pared interna y externa del mismo en diversos puntos de referencia preestablecidos. Estos datos fueron analizados estadísticamente con el test de ANOVA. Resultados: Ambos sistemas produjeron transporte y desviación respecto a la trayectoria original del conducto radicular, pero el análisis estadístico (ANOVA Factorial 2x8) no cuantificó diferencias significativas entre ambos sistemas (p=0,4044) Conclusiones: Bajo las condiciones de este trabajo, ambos sistemas producen transporte y desviación respecto a la trayectoria original del conducto radicular.

Abstract Aim: To compare the centering capacity and apical transport of the Reciproc Blue and X-Pendo Shaper system in resin blocks with juxtaposed pre and postoperative photographs, using the Photoshop software. Materials and methods: 20 resin plugs were randomly divided into two groups (n=10) that were prepared with XP-endo Shaper and Reciproc Blue respectively. Digital photographs of the blocks were taken, before and after preparation, with each system in the same position. Then the obtained photographs were juxtaposed using Photoshop software. The deviations of the center of the canal, with respect to its inter nal and external wall, were measured at various pre-established reference points. These data were statistically analysed with the ANOVA test. Results: Both systems produced transport and deviation from the original trajectory of the root canal, but the statistical analysis (2x8 Factorial ANOVA) did not quantify significant differences between both systems (p=0.4044) Conclusions: Under the conditions of this work, both systems produce transport and deviation with respect to the original trajectory of the root canal.

The effect of rotation speed of XP-endo Shaper on apically extruded debris during endodontic procedures: an In Vitro study / El efecto de la velocidad de rotación de XP-endo Shaper sobre los desechos extruídos apicalmente durante los procedimientos de endodoncia: un estudio in vitro

Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of using a higher rotation speed with the XP-endo Shaper (XPS) on apically extruded debris and operation time during endodontic treatment and retreatment procedures. Sixty mesial roots of mandibular first molar teeth were randomly assigned to four groups (Initial treatment groups: XPS used at 1000 or 3000rpm rotation speeds and Retreatment groups: XPS used at 1000 or 3000rpm rotation speeds). During the initial treatment and retreatment procedures preweighed eppendorf tubes were used to collect apically extruded debris, and the operation time was recorded in seconds. The extruded debris was quantified by subtracting the preinstrumentation from the postinstrumentation weight of the Eppendorf tubes. Data were analysed using two-way ANOVA at a significance level of 0.05. In all groups, the use of the XPS at 1000 or 3000rpm rotation speeds had no statistically significant effect on the amount of apically extruded debris (p>0.05). The use of the XPS at a 3000rpm rotation speed significantly decreased the instrumentation time (p<0.05). In summary, the use of the XPS at high rotation speeds in initial treatment and retreatment procedures did not have a significant effect on the amount of apically extruded debris but significantly decreased the operation time.

Resumen El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar el efecto del uso de una mayor velocidad de rotación con XP-endo Shaper (XPS) sobre los desechos extruidos apicalmente y el tiempo de operación durante el tratamiento endodóntico y los procedimientos de retratamiento. Sesenta raíces mesiales de los primeros molares mandibulares se asignaron aleatoriamente a cuatro grupos (grupos de tratamiento inicial: XPS usado a velocidades de rotación de 1000 o 3000rpm y grupos de retratamiento: XPS usado a velocidades de rotación de 1000 o 3000rpm). Durante el tratamiento inicial y los procedimientos de retratamiento se utilizaron tubos Eppendorf pesados previamente para recoger los desechos extruidos apicalmente, y el tiempo de operación se registró en segundos. Los residuos extruidos se cuantificaron restando la preinstrumentación del peso postinstrumentación de los tubos Eppendorf. Los datos se analizaron mediante ANOVA bidireccional a un nivel de significación de 0,05. En todos los grupos, el uso del XPS a velocidades de rotación de 1000 o 3000rpm no tuvo un efecto estadísticamente significativo sobre la cantidad de detritos extruidos apicalmente (p>0.05). El uso del XPS a una velocidad de rotación de 3000rpm disminuyó significativamente el tiempo de instrumentación (p<0.05). En resumen, el uso del XPS a altas velocidades de rotación en los procedimientos de tratamiento inicial y retratamiento no tuvo un efecto significativo en la cantidad de detritos extruidos apicalmente, pero disminuyó significativamente el tiempo de operación.

The effect of glide path preparation on the shaping ability of XP-endo® Shaper in simulated canals

Aims: To compare the shaping efficiency of the XP-endo Shaper with or without glide path preparation with sequenced Scout Race files in J-shaped resin blocks Material and Methods: Forty simulated J-shaped root canals were classified into two groups (n=20). While the root canals were shaped with XPS after a glide path was created with Scout Race files in Group 1, the same procedures were done without the glide path preparation in Group 2. The pre-and post-instrumentation images were taken and superimposed. Transportation value (TV), centering ability (CA) and the total amount of resin removed (TRR) was calculated by using the obtained images with Adobe Photoshop CS5 software. These parameters were calculated based on 18 reference points (9 inner/9 outer walls) with 1-mm intervals according to 3 sections (coronal, middle, and apical of the canals). The data were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis and then Dunn's multiple comparison tests (p ≤ 0.05). Results: More resin was removed in Group 2 apical and coronal sections than in Group 1 (p=0.036). In Group 2, a higher transportation value was obtained in apical and middle sections compared to Group 1 (p<0.001). Group 1 showed a higher centering ratio in apical and middle sections than in Group 2 (p<0.001). The centering ability of the instruments was decreased in the curvature part (middle section) of the canals. Conclusions: Within the limits of this study, glide path preparation using Scout Race instruments improved the shaping ability of XPS instrument by leading to less transportation and maintaining centering ability.

A CBCT based digital analysis of shaping ability of Max Wire® alloy file in the treatment of large and curved root canals

Aim: To evaluate the limits of the shaping ability of MaxWire® alloy file in the treatment of pre-created large and curved root canals with different apical sizes by using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and methods: Forty-five permanent maxillary first molars with moderately curved palatal roots (20°-30°) were divided into three groups, and large root canals were created with apical diameter #35 (Group 1), #40 (Group 2) or #50 (Group 3) by using BioRace NiTi System. Then, they were reshaped with the MaxWire alloy file, XP-endo Shaper®. Canals were scanned before and after instrumentation by using the CBCT scanner. Canal transportation (CT), centering ratio (CR), % increased prepared area (PA), and % increased prepared outline (PO) at 2, 3, and 4 mm from the apex were calculated. Data were statistically analyzed at P < 0.05. Results: There was a significant difference in the mean increase in PO in all apical sizes and all three levels. At both 3 mm and 4 mm levels the maximum PA and PO were achieved in apical size 35, while at 2 mm level the maximum values were obtained in apical size 40. There was no statistically significant difference in CT and CR within groups at 2 mm distance from the apex. Conclusion: Max Wire alloy technology of this novel instrument makes it possible to clean and touch the dentin walls of large and curved root canals. Small FOV and small voxel size of CBCT could also be used in shaping ability studies in endodontics.