RESUMO
Objective To evaluate the clinical efficiency of humanized anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody (Campath-1H) and anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody (Zenapax) induction therapy in intestinal transplantation patients.Method The data of 6 patients receiving Campath-1H and 5 patients receving Zenapax induction therapy in intestinal transplantation between 2007 and 2012 were analyzed retrospectively.The counts of peripheral blood lymphocytes and monocytes,incidence of rejection and infention,and liver and kidney toxicity of recipients were recorded before and 3 months after transplantation.Results Of 6 intestinal transplantation patients receiving Campath-1H induction therapy,1 died of acute heart failure on the postoperative day 3,and the rest 5 patients had a powerful depletion of lymphocytes and monocytes in 8 weeks,followed by gradual increases after 8 weeks.The percentage of peripheral blood CD3 + T cells,CD4 + T cells,and CD8 + T cells was dropped to 5％ before administration,and remained at a steady low level in the first 8 weeks after induction.Of 5 patients receiving Zenapax induction therapy,1 died of Aspergillus infection on the postoperative day 25,and the rest 4 patients had an obeivous increase of lymphocytes and monocytes on the postoperative day 1.Counts of lymphocytes and monocytes kept steady at normal levels from the 1st to 12th week.One case of mild rejection was found in Campath-1H group.One case of mild,one moderate and one severe rejection were detected in Zenapax group.All rejections were successfully cured by prompt anti-rejection therapy.There were no significant difference in serum creatimine,urea nitrogen,alanine aminotransferase or total bilirubin after 3 months in comparison to preoperation.Conclusion Both Campath-1H induction therapy and Zenapax induction therapy successfully induce immune tolerance in patients with intestinal transplantation.Campath-1H seems to offer better immunosuppression against Zenapax during the first 3 months posttransplantation.
RESUMO
Objective To observe the role of preoperative single administration of zenapax in the prevention of acute rejection after kidney transplantation, and evaluate its safety. Methods A total of 80 renal transplant recipients during the same period were divided into treatment and control groups, each group containing 40 patients. There were no difference between the two groups in treatment regime except the preoperative single administration of zenapax in the treatment group. Results Acute rejection rate was significantly lower in the treatment group(7.5%) than the control group(25%) within 6 months after kidney transplantation(P
RESUMO
Objective To investigate the role of zenapax in the prevention of acute rejection in renal transplant recipients.Methods The medical records of 50 renal transplant recipients treated with one dose of zenapax(study group) and simultaneously 30 renal transplant recipients without treatment of zenapax(control group) were retrospectively analyzed.The follow-up was six months.The incidence of acute rejection,renal allograft function,infection,and adverse effects of zenapax were comparatively analyzed between the 2 groups.Results Acute rejection rate was lower in study group(13/50,26%) compared with that in control group(17/30,57%;P)(0.05)).Conclusions One dose regimen of zenapax as part of immunosuppressive therapy is effective in the prevention of acute rejection in renal transplant recipients.It has less side effects and contributes to the improvement of renal allograft function.
RESUMO
Objective To evaluate the effects of small dose of antithymocyte globulin(ATG)and zenapax in the induction therapy for kidney transplant recipients.Methods A series of 150 cadaver-donor kidney transplant recipients were randomly divided to 3 groups,ie,small dose of ATG group(total dose,2.1 -3.0 mg/kg;n=72),zenapax group(50mg,on the first and 14th d after operation;n=15)and controls without induction therapy(n=63).Follow-up was 6 months.The rates of acute rejection,delayed graft func- tion(DGF)and pulmonary infection were statistically compared among the 3 groups.Results During a 6-month period,in ATG,zenapax and control groups,acute rejection episodes occurred in 4 cases(5.5%), 1(6.7%)and 10(15.9%),respectively;DGF occurred in 3(4.2%),0 and 8(12.7%),respectively;pul- monary infection occurred in 4(5.1%),1(6.7%)and 3(4.8%),respectively;leucocytopenia occurred in 3(4.2%),1(6.7%)and 5(7.9%),respectively;thrombocytopenia occurred in 2(2.8%),1(6.7%)and 5(7.9%),respectively.Conclusions In the early stage of kidney transplantation,small dose of ATG and zenapax can be the optimal choice for induction therapy.
RESUMO
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of daclizumab(zenapax) in liver transplantation patients with renal insufficiency. Methods We reviewed the use of daclizumab in 50 patients with renal insufficiency or at high risk of renal insufficiency during the period of liver transplantation between March 2001 to February 2003. The control group included 62 cases with no renal insufficiency at the same period. Results Renal function was recovered in 36 of 37 patients. The administration of daclizumab caused no vital organ dysfunction. Acute rejection was 6% (3/50) vs. 29 % (18/62) (P=0.826), infection was 56% (28/50) vs. 58% (36/62)(P=0.826). Conclusion Immunoprophylaxis with daclizumab regimen is safe, effective and well tolerated, and does not lead to increased opportunistic infections, and helps in improving renal function, by reducing the dosage and postponing the application of calcineurin inhibitor.