Comparison of the effects of ropivacaine and sufentanil alone or in combination with continuous subarachnoid block for labor analgesia / 中国生化药物杂志

Objective To investigate the effect of ropivacaine and sufentanil alone or in combination with continuous subarachnoid block for labor analgesia.MethodsIn this experiment, 63 cases of spontaneous delivery of labor in First People's Hospital Jiande City from June 2015 to December 2016 were randomly divided into experimental group and control group according to the time of hospitalization.Each 21 cases.In the control group, 1 mg of ropivacaine was treated with 1 mg of ropivacaine (15 mg) and 5μL of sufentanil.The control group 1 was treated with 1% ropivacaine alone.The control group 2 was treated with 6μl of sufentanil.ResultsIn this experiment, the effect of subarachnoid analgesia was VAS score≤3 points, the experimental group was significantly faster than the control group 1, 2 (P<0.05), the first PCEA administration time is subarachnoid The effective duration of analgesia in the experimental group was statistically significant (P<0.05).In addition, VAS score was statistically significant.There was no significant difference between the three groups.In addition, the three groups of maternal active period, the second labor time difference was not statistically significant.ConclusionCompared with the original single use of agents, ropivacaine and sufentanil continuous subarachnoid analgesia for labor analgesia had better effects on maternal effects on labor.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under continuous spinal anesthesia in a patient with Steinert's disease / Colecistectomia laparoscópica sob raquianestesia contínua em paciente com doença de Steinert

ABSTRACT Steinert's disease is an intrinsic disorder of the muscle with multisystem manifestations. Myotonia may affect any muscle group, is elicited by several factors and drugs used in general anesthesia like hypnotics, sedatives and opioids. Although some authors recommend the use of regional anesthesia or combined anesthesia with low doses of opioids, the safest anesthetic technique still has to be established. We performed a continuous spinal anesthesia in a patient with Steinert's disease undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy using 10 mg of bupivacaine 0.5% and provided ventilatory support in the perioperative period. Continuous spinal anesthesia was safely used in Steinert's disease patients but is not described for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. We reported a continuous spinal anesthesia as an appropriate technique for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and particularly valuable in Steinert's disease patients.

RESUMO A doença de Steinert é uma desordem intrínseca do músculo com manifestações multissistêmicas. A miotonia pode afetar qualquer grupo muscular e é provocada por vários fatores e medicamentos usados em anestesia geral, como hipnóticos, sedativos e opiáceos. Embora alguns autores recomendem o uso de anestesia regional ou anestesia combinada com opiáceos em doses baixas, a técnica anestésica mais segura ainda precisa ser estabelecida. Administramos raquianestesia contínua em um paciente com doença de Steinert submetido à colecistectomia laparoscópica, com 10 mg de bupivacaína a 0,5%, e fornecemos suporte ventilatório no período perioperatório. A raquianestesia contínua foi usada com segurança em pacientes com doença de Steinert, mas não foi relatada em colecistectomia laparoscópica. Relatamos a raquianestesia contínua como uma técnica adequada para a colecistectomia laparoscópica e particularmente valiosa em pacientes com doença de Steinert.

Comparação de levobupivacaína em raquianestesia contínua ou com dose única para cirurgia de ressecção transuretral de próstata / The comparison of levobupivacaine in continuous or single dose spinal anesthesia for transurethral resection of prostate surgery / Comparación de la levobupivacaína en raquianestesia continua ocon dosis única para cirugía de resección transuretral de próstata

Justificativa e objetivo: comparar a eficácia de levobupivacaína na indução de raquianestesia contínua (RAC) versus dose única (Radu) em pacientes programados para ressecção transuretral de próstata (RTUP). Métodos: foram incluídos no estudo 50 pacientes, ≥ 60 anos, ASA I-II ou III. Levobupivacaína a 0,5% (12,5 mg) foi administrada por via intratecal no grupo Radu. No grupo RAC, levobupivacaína a 0,25% (2 mL) foi inicialmente administrada através de cateter espinhal. Para o nível de bloqueio sensorial atingir o dermátomo T10, 1 mL adicional de levobupivacaína a 0,25% foi administrado através do cateter a cada 10 minutos. Os parâmetros hemodinâmicos e as características do bloqueio foram registrados. Amostras de sangue dos pacientes foram coletadas nos períodos pré- e pós-operatórios para determinar os níveis plasmáticos de cortisona e adrenalina. Resultados: a RAC proporcionou melhor estabilidade hemodinâmica em comparação com a Radu, particularmente aos 90 minutos após a administração intratecal. O aumento do nível de bloqueio sensorial foi rápido e o tempo para atingir a anestesia cirúrgica foi menor no grupo Radu. O desenvolvimento do bloqueio motor foi mais rápido no grupo Radu. No grupo RAC, um nível semelhante de anestesia foi obtido com o uso de uma dose mais baixa de levobupivacaína, que foi relacionada à recuperação mais rápida. Embora ambas as técnicas tenham sido eficazes na prevenção da resposta ao estresse cirúrgico, os níveis de cortisona no pós-operatório foram mais suprimidos no grupo Radu. Conclusão: a técnica RAC com levobupivacaína a 0,25% pode ser usada como um método de anestesia regional em pacientes idosos programados para RTUP. .

Background: The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy of levobupivacaine induced continuous spinal anesthesia (CSA) versus single dose spinal anesthesia (SDSA) in patients who are planned to undergo transurethral prostate resection. Methods: Sixty years or older, ASA I-II or III, 50 patients were included in the study. 12.5 mg 0.5% levobupivacaine were administered intrathecally in SDSA group. In CSA group, initially 2 mL of 0.25% levobupivacaine were administered through spinal catheter. In order to achieve sensory block level at T10 dermatome, additional 1 mL of 0.25% levobupivacaine were administered through the catheter in every 10 min. Hemodynamic parameters and block characteristics were recorded. Preoperative and postoperative blood samples of the patients were drawn to determine plasma cortisone and plasma epinephrine levels. Results: CSA technique provided better hemodynamic stability compared to SDSA technique particularly 90 min after intrathecal administration. The rise in sensory block level was rapid and the time to reach surgical anesthesia was shorter in SDSA group. Motor block developed faster in SDSA group. In CSA group, similar anesthesia level was achieved by using lower levobupivacaine dose and which was related to faster recovery. Although, both techniques were effective in preventing surgical stress respond, postoperative cortisone levels were suppressed more in SDSA group. Conclusion: CSA technique with 0.25% levobupivacaine can be used as a regional anesthesia method for elderly patients planned to have TUR-P operation. .

Justificación y objetivo: el objetivo de este estudio fue comparar la eficacia de la levobupivacaína en la inducción de la raquianestesia continua (RAC) versus dosis única (RADU) en pacientes programados para la resección transuretral de próstata. Métodos: cincuenta pacientes, ≥ 60 años de edad, ASA I-II o III, fueron incluidos en el estudio. La levobupivacaína al 0,5% (12,5 mg) se administró vía intratecal en el grupo RADU. En el grupo RAC, la levobupivacaína al 0,25% (2 mL) fue inicialmente administrada a través de un catéter espinal. Para que el nivel de bloqueo sensorial alcanzase el dermatoma T10, se administró 1 mL adicional de levobupivacaína al 0,25% a través del catéter cada 10 min. Los parámetros hemodinámicos y las características del bloqueo fueron registrados. Las muestras de sangre de los pacientes fueron extraídas en los períodos pre y postoperatorios para determinar los niveles plasmáticos de cortisona y adrenalina. Resultados: la técnica RAC proporcionó una mejor estabilidad hemodinámica en comparación con la técnica RADU, particularmente a los 90 min después de la administración intratecal. El aumento del nivel de bloqueo sensorial fue rápido y el tiempo para alcanzar la anestesia quirúrgica fue menor en el grupo RADU. El desarrollo del bloqueo motor fue más rápido en el grupo RADU. En el grupo RAC, un nivel parecido de anestesia se obtuvo con una dosis más baja de levobupivacaína que fue relacionada con la recuperación más rápida. Aunque ambas técnicas hayan sido eficaces en la prevención de la respuesta al estrés quirúrgico, los niveles de cortisona en el postoperatorio fueron mejor suprimidos en el grupo RADU. .

Continuous spinal anesthesia for renal homotransplantation / 国际外科学杂志

Objective To discuss the feasibility and safety of continuous spinal anesthesia (CSA) in renal transplantation through comparing the effects of combined spinal and epidural anesthesia (CSEA) and CSA renal transplantation. Methods Sixty patients undertaking renal transplantation were divided into two groups randomly. Group A, 30 patients, undertaking operation with CSEA; Group B, 30 patients, undertaking operation with CSA. The patients in group A were injected 2 mL 0.75% ropivacaine, then epidural catheter was inserted, 0. 75% ropivacaine 10 mL was administered when needed. The patients in group B were injected 2 mL 0.75% ropivacaine into spinal through Spinocath catheter, and 0.75% ropivacaine 1ml was administered through Spinocath catheter when needed. We observed the effects of the two anesthesia methods and the changes of the patients' vital signs. Results The patients in group A and B all completed the operation smoothly; there were no significant differences in the circulatory function before and during operation; there were no complications related to anesthesia in all the patients; group B was superior to group A in the aspects of the control and maintaining of anesthesia. Conclusion Continuous spinal anesthesia applied to renal transplantation is safe and feasible.

Anestesia espinal a través de catéter para cesárea en una mujer con estenosis valvular aórtica severa / Spinal anesthesia through catheter for cesarean section in a woman with severe aortic valve stenosis

.

It is the case of afatient 32years- oíd and 34 weeks of gestation with antecedents of severe aortic stenosis that is programmedfor caesarean section. She has been displaying progressive symptoms (dyspnea and síncope) reason why she had tried an aortic valvuloplasty with balloon without satisfactory result. The anesthesia for the procedure was spinal continuous through catheter using 3,75 mgs of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaina, 25 mcg of fentanyl and 100 mcg morphine, with invasive monitoring of arterial bloodfressure and cardiac output. Verioperative maternal orfetal complications did not appear. With this report and the revisión of literature, we suggest that the neuroaxial anesthetic techniques are agood alternative to the general anesthesia in fregnated patients with severe aortic valvular stenosis.