RESUMO
OBJECTIVES@#The objectives of this study were to compare the voiding pattern of toilet-trained patientswith and without recurrent UTI, to describe the voiding pattern of toilet-trained patients withoutUTI aged 2 to 15 years old and to describe the voiding pattern of toilet trained patients with recurrentUTI aged 2 to 15 years old.@*MATERIALS AND METHODS@#A total of 80 toilet-trained Filipino children divided into two groups with 40each were included. R-UTI group consisted of patients aged 2 to 15 years old who presented withrecurrent UTI. The control (No-UTI) group consisted of children aged 2 to 15 years old without anyurinary symptoms and without history of urinary tract infection. Parents completed a 72-hour bladderchart at home. All participants answered Farhat's DVSS. Patients underwent uroflowmetry,uroflowmetry with EMG and post void residual assessment (PVR). Qmax, uroflowmetry pattern,bladder wall thickness and PVR were recorded and analyzed using independent t-test.@*RESULTS@#The mean age of subjects with UTI was 6.32 ± 2.77 years and those in the control group havea mean age 6.67 ± 2.77 years old. Of patients of R-UTI group the following were statisticallysignificant compared to No-UTI : Constipation (48% vs 15%), mean frequency of voiding volumesgreater than 125% of the estimated bladder capacity (EBC) at daytime (0.8 ± 0.22 vs 0.05 ± 1.20p=0.0002), frequency (45% vs 5%), mean average voided volume (126.54 ± 56.05 mL vs 84.34 ±34.26 mL p=0.0001), mean daytime average voided volume (121.33 ± 59.59 mL vs 87.90 ± 36.41mL p =0.0033), mean maximum voided volume (232.25 ± 113.99 mL vs 130.85 ± 49.99 mLp<0.0001), mean bladder thickness (3.83 ± 0.68 mm vs 3.38 ± 0.62 mm p = 0.0030), mean PVR(12.96 ± 10.54 mL vs 5.21 ± 5.68 mL p=0.0001). PVR was significant in 45% of cases compared to3% significant PVR (when 4-6 years old defined as >10ml or >10%of EBC, and if >7 years old >20mlor >15% of EBC). When mean PVR was computed as percentage of EBC, R-UTI group had astatistically higher percentage compared to the no-UTI group (6.27 ± 2.52 % vs 2.52 ± 2.75 %p=0.0001). Mean observed bladder capacity (OBC) was found to be more than the EBC in 35% ofcases in the R-UTI group compared to 12% of No-UTI group (p=0.018). Uroflow-EMG in the R-UTI group were, 85% synergic, 12% dyssynergic and 3% interrupted pattern. EMG in the No-UTIgroup were, 38% synergic, 55% dyssynergic, 2% delayed relaxation, 5% interrupted. The EMGpatterns were statistically significant between the groups (p<0.0001). Uroflow patterns werecomparable between the two groups (p=1.000).@*CONCLUSION@#Constipation was more frequent in the R-UTI group. R-UTI group had a higher meanfrequency of EBC > 125% during daytime, frequency, mean average voided volume, mean averagevoided volume during daytime, mean maximum voided volume, mean bladder thickness, mean PVRcompared to the without UTI group. Mean observed bladder capacity was observed to be greater thanthe EBC in the R-UTI group compared to the No-UTI group. R-UTI group was synergic compared toNo-UTI group which were dyssynergic.