RESUMO
Advance care planning (ACP) is an important part of hospice care, a core index of high-quality palliative care, and one of the effective indicators for improving the life quality of end-of-life patients. By reviewing the progress of various theoretical models and their applications in ACP, including planned behavior theory, behavioral change wheel theory, self-determination theory, prospect theory, change theory, and cultural suitability theory, this paper delved into the advantages and limitations of each theoretical model and analyzed its research prospects in future ACP clinical practice to promote researchers’ correct understanding of the role of different theoretical models in various types of studies, with a view to providing new ideas for clinical research on ACP.
RESUMO
Objective: We retrospectively studied the adaptation and limits of applying Biological Prognostic Score Version-2 composed only of blood test results to prognostic prediction in end-of-life non-cancer patients. Methods: The prognostic score was calculated from the cholinesterase, blood urea nitrogen, and white blood cell counts of hospitalized end-of-life non-cancer patients, divided into three groups with cutoff values, and prediction accuracy analysis, survival analysis, and simple regression analysis were performed. Results: Diagnostic accuracy of 204 non-cancer patients at the same cut-off value and predicted survival time as cancer was 79% accurate at 3 weeks survival and 63% at 9 weeks. Specificity and negative predictive value were highly accurate, sensitivity and positive predictive value were low. In the survival analysis, the discrimination between the 3 groups was significant (p<0.05), but the regression coefficient in the regression analysis was not significant (p=0.43). Conclusion: The prognostic prediction using this score for non-cancer patients has high prediction accuracy in the case of good prognosis. It is suggested that clinical use of this score is also possible if used cautiously.
RESUMO
There were no reports about long survival predictors in palliative care settings. We divided categories into more than 31 days of hospitalization (short period hospitalization) and more than 61 days of hospitalization) (long hospitalization) and analyzed prognostic factors in multivariate methods. We measured the association between the long hospitalization and short period hospitalization groups with regard to terminal symptoms (cancer pain, delirium, nausea and vomiting, fatigue, and dyspnea) and treatment (hydration, continuous sedation, and opioids). In the more than 31 days of hospitalization group, sex (Odds Ratio 0.502), consciousness (Odds Ratio 0.258), and calcium levels (Odds Ratio 0.559) were statistically significant. In the more than 61 days of hospitalization group, the serum CRP level (Odds Ratio 0.254) was statistically significant and serum calcium level (Odds Ratio 0.376) exhibited a trend. The prevalence of fatigue and amount of hydration were significantly low in the more than 31 days of hospitalization group. There were no differences in terminal symptoms and treatment in the more than 61 days of hospitalization group.