Correlation between geriatric nutritional risk index and adverse events in elderly hemodialysis patients / 中华老年心脑血管病杂志

Objective To explore the relationship between geriatric nutritional risk index(GNRI)and adverse outcomes in elderly patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis(MHD).Methods A prospective cohort trial was conducted on 337 MHD patients aged ≥60 years in hemodialysis centers of 11 hospitals in Beijing from April to June 2017.Their baseline data were collected,and they were divided into non-malnutrition(GNRI≥98,226 cases),mild malnutrition(92≤GNRI＜98,81 cases),and major malnutrition groups(GNRI＜92,30 cases).All of them were followed up until June 2018.The endpoint events were all-cause mortality and cardiovascular disease(CVD)mortality.Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to compare the cumulative survival rate among the 3 groups.Multivariate Cox regression model was employed to analyze the relationship of GNRI with all-cause and CVD mortality.Results The mild and major malnutrition groups had significantly lower BMI,serum albumin level and GNRI(P＜0.01).During the median follow-up of 52(4.4-52.0)weeks,56(16.6％)patients died of all-cause death and 25(44.6％)of CVD death.Kaplan-Meier survival curve showed significant differences in all-cause mortality(x2=30.484,P＜0.01)and CVD mortality(x2=22.398,P＜0.01)in the 3 groups.Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that,as a continuous variable,elevated GNRI was a protective factor for all-cause mortality(HR=0.910,95％CI:0.870-0.952,P=0.000)and CVD mortality(HR=0.895,95％CI:0.852-0.940,P=0.000),and as a categorical variable,mild and major malnutri-tion were independently correlated with all-cause and CVD mortality(P＜0.05).Conclusion GNRI is an independent risk factor for all-cause and CVD mortality in elderly MHD patients.Mo-nitoring the nutritional status using GNRI can predict the risk of adverse prognosis.

Predictive value of geriatric nutritional risk index in stroke-associated pneumonia / 中华老年心脑血管病杂志

Objective To investigate the predictive value of geriatric nutritional risk index(GNRI)for stroke-associated pneumonia in elderly patients with acute ischemic stroke(AIS).Methods A total of 1505 elderly patients with AIS admitted to Department of Neurology of the Second Affili-ated Hospital of Nanchang University from January 2017 to October 2022 were included in this retrospective study.According to GNRI nutritional assessment,they were divided into T1(high nutritional risk,GNRI＜82,n=49),T2(moderate nutritional risk,GNRI 82-91,n=305),T3(low nutritional risk,GNRI 92-98,n=555),and T4(no nutritional risk,GNRL＞98,n=596)groups.Additionally,based on the discharge diagnosis,they were further classified into pulmonary infection group(150 cases)and non-infection group(1355 cases).These subjects were also ran-domly assigned into training,validation,and testing sets in a ratio of 16∶4∶5.Multivariate logis-tic regression analysis was performed to identify the risk factors for pulmonary infection in stroke patients.Logistic regression and XGBoost algorithms were used to establish prediction models for pulmonary infection.The models were evaluated with their AUC value,accuracy,sensitivity,and specificity based on ROC curve analysis.Results Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that hypertension,invasive procedures,consciousness disorders,CRP,lymphocyte count,hemoglo-bin and GNRI were independent risk factors for pulmonary infection in stroke patients(P＜0.05).The AUC value of the GNRI model for predicting pulmonary infection in the testing set was 0.742(95％CI:0.651-0.833),with an accuracy of 71.8％,sensitivity of 76.7％,and specificity of 71.2％.The combined model of clinical indicators(hypertension,invasive procedures,conscious-ness disorders,CRP,lymphocyte count,hemoglobin)and GNRI achieved an AUC value of 0.776(95％CI:0.700-0.853),accuracy of 74.8％,sensitivity of 83.3％,and specificity of 73.8％in the test set.Conclusion GNRI is an independent risk factor for pulmonary infection in elderly pa-tients with AIS and has a certain value in predicting pulmonary infection after AIS.

Clinical evaluation of combined geriatric nutritional risk index and modified creatinine index predicting all-cause mortality in middle-aged and older patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis / 中华肾脏病杂志

Objective:To explore the relationship between geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) and modified creatinine index (mCI) and all-cause mortality in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients.Methods:It was a prospective cohort study. The MHD patients aged≥50 years old at hemodialysis centers of eleven hospitals in Beijing from April to June 2017 were selected as subjects. Baseline clinical data of the patients were collected. The patients were divided into high GNRI group (≥98) and low GNRI group (<98), and high mCI group (≥20.16 mg·kg -1·d -1) and low mCI group (<20.16 mg·kg -1·d -1), and further divided into 4 groups: G1 group (high GNRI and high mCI), G2 group (high GNRI and low mCI), G3 group (low GNRI and high mCI) and G4 group (low GNRI and low mCI). The differences of clinical characteristics among the four groups were compared. The patients were followed-up until June 2018 or death or loss, and the endpoint event was all-cause mortality. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to compare the differences of the cumulative survival rates among the four groups. A multivariate Cox regression model was used to analyze the relationship between GNRI and mCI and all-cause mortality. Results:A total of 613 patients were included in the study, aged (63.65±7.78) years old (ranged from 50 to 81 years old), with 355 males (57.91%). The GNRI and mCI were (99.35±5.75) and (20.16±2.79) mg·kg -1·d -1, respectively. There were 232 patients (37.85%) in the G1 group, 177 patients (28.87%) in the G2 group, 95 patients (15.50%) in the G3 group, and 109 patients (17.78%) in the G4 group. There were statistically significant differences in age, sex, proportion of diabetes, proportion of coronary heart disease, body mass index, serum albumin and serum creatinine among the four groups (all P<0.05). A total of 69 patients (11.26%) died during a median follow-up time of 52(4, 52) weeks. Kaplan-Meier survival curve results showed that the mortality of patients with low GNRI was higher than that of patients with high GNRI (log-rank χ 2=26.956, P<0.001), and the mortality of patients with low mCI was higher than that of patients with high mCI (log-rank χ 2=25.842, P<0.001). The mortality was 3.45% in group G1, 10.73% in group G2, 9.47% in group G3, and 30.28% in group G4, and the differences among the four groups were statistically significant (log-rank χ 2=57.153, P<0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis results showed that as continuous variables, GNRI ( HR=0.911, 95% CI 0.882-0.941, P<0.001) and mCI ( HR=0.873, 95% CI 0.797-0.956, P=0.003) were correlated with all-cause death. As categorical variables, compared with high GNRI group and high mCI group, patients with low GNRI ( HR=3.469, 95% CI 2.125-5.665, P<0.001) and low mCI ( HR=3.255, 95% CI 1.879-5.640, P<0.001) had higher risks of death. Compared with G1 group, patients in G2 group ( HR=2.488, 95% CI 1.079-5.738, P=0.033) and G4 group ( HR=9.449, 95% CI 4.362-20.470, P<0.001) had higher risks of death. Conclusions:GNRI and mCI are independent predictive factors of all-cause mortality in MHD patients. The combination of GNRI and MCI can more accurately predict the risk of all-cause death in middle-aged and elderly MHD patients.

Combined effects of nutritional status on long-term mortality in patients with non-st segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the performance of controlling nutritional status (CONUT) index, geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI), and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) scores in predicting the long-term prognosis of patients with non-ST-elevated myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: A total of 915 patients with NSTEMI (female: 48.4%; mean age: 73.1±9.0 years) who underwent PCI at Adana Numune Training and Research Hospital, Cardiology Clinic between January 2014 and January 2015 were included in this cross-sectional and retrospective study. CONUT, GNRI, and PNI scores were calculated based on the admission data derived from samples of peripheral venous blood. The mean follow-up duration was 64.5±15.4 months. RESULTS: During follow-up (mean 64.5±15.4 months), 179 patients (19.6%) died. The mean GNRI and PNI scores were significantly lower in the nonsurvivor group; however, the median CONUT score was significantly higher in the nonsurvivor group compared with the survivor group. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses have shown that GNRI score has similar performance to the CONUT score and has better performance than PNI score in predicting 5-year mortality. The Kaplan-Meier curve analysis has shown that patients with lower PNI or GNRI had higher cumulative mortality than the patients with higher PNI or GNRI. Also, the patients with higher CONUT scores had higher cumulative mortality compared with those with lower scores. The multivariate analyses have shown that GNRI (HR: 0.973), PNI (HR: 0.967), CONUT score (HR: 1.527), and body mass index (BMI) (HR: 0.818) were independent predictors of the 5-year mortality in patients with NSTEMI. CONCLUSION: In this study, we have shown that CONUT score, GNRI, and PNI values were associated with the long-term mortality in patients with NSTEMI who underwent PCI, and GNRI yielded similar results to CONUT score but was better than PNI.

Geriatric nutritional risk index predicts all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES: Geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) might predict the all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure (HF). We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the correlation between GNRI and all-cause mortality in patients with HF. METHODS: We searched the PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases for clinical trials investigating the association between GNRI and all-cause mortality in patients with HF, having the primary endpoint as all-cause mortality. RESULTS: In total, nine studies involving 7,659 subjects were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The results indicated that major risk and moderate risk GNRI (GNRI<92) was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality in elderly patients with HF (hazard ratios [HR] 1.59, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.37-1.85). Low risk GNRI (GNRI<98) group predicted all-cause mortality in elderly HF patients (HR 1.56, 95%CI 1.12-2.18) when compared with the high GNRI value group. A subgroup analysis indicated that the relationship between GNRI and HF might differ based on the subtype of heart failure. CONCLUSIONS: GNRI is a simple and well-established nutritional assessment tool to predict all-cause mortality in patients with HF.

Índice de riesgo nutricional geriátrico en pacientes hospitalizados por enfermedades vasculares periféricas / Geriatric nutritional risk indexes in patients hospitalized due to peripheral vascular diseases

Introducción: El índice de riesgo nutricional geriátrico es un instrumento simple y exacto que permite identificar a pacientes hospitalizados con este riesgo. Objetivo: Valorar la prevalencia de riesgo nutricional en pacientes ingresados por presentar una enfermedad vascular. Métodos: Se evaluaron de forma transversal 102 pacientes mayores de 18 años (65 % hombres) ingresados de forma consecutiva entre octubre y diciembre de 2018 en el Instituto Nacional de Angiología y Cirugía Vascular en La Habana Cuba, independientemente de la enfermedad de base y que estuvieran de acuerdo en participar en el estudio. La variable principal de salida fue la proporción de pacientes con riesgo nutricional: riesgo alto (< 82), moderado (82-92), bajo (93-98) y sin riesgo (> 98); las variables secundarias resultaron la edad, el sexo, el índice de masa corporal y la concentración de albúmina. Resultados: El 12,9 por ciento (intervalo de confianza 95 por ciento: 6,2-19,6); el 16,8 por ciento (9,4-24,2) y el 22,8 por ciento (14,5-31,3) de los pacientes presentaron un riesgo nutricional alto, moderado y ligero, respectivamente. Solo el 47,5 por ciento (37,6-57,4), de los pacientes no presentó riesgo nutricional. La edad y el sexo no mostraron correlación con el riesgo nutricional; la concentración de albúmina y el índice de masa corporal y el índice de riesgo nutricional sí se asociaron de forma importante (R2: 0,98 y 0,59, respectivamente). Conclusiones: La prevalencia de pacientes con riesgo nutricional es elevada en el ámbito hospitalario y puede evaluarse por intermedio del índice de riesgo nutricional geriátrico(AU)

Introduction: The Geriatric nutritional risk index is a simple and accurate instrument that allows identifying hospitalized patients with this risk. Objective: To assess the prevalence of nutritional risk in patients admitted for presenting a vascular disease. Methods: There were evaluated in cross-sectional way 102 patients older than 18 years (65% male) admitted consecutively from October to December, 2018 at the National Institute of Angiology and Vascular Surgery in Havana, Cuba, regardless of the underlying disease and who agreed to participate in the study. The main variable was the proportion of patients with nutritional risk: high risk (<82), moderate (82-92), low (93-98) and without risk (>98); secondary variables were age, sex, body mass index and the concentration of albumin. Results: The 12.9 percent (95 percent confidence interval: 6,2-19,6); the 16.8 percent (9,4-24,2) and the 22.8 percent (14,5-31,3) of the patients had high, moderate, and light nutritional risks, respectively. Only 47.5 percent (37,6-57,4) of the patients did not present nutritional risk. The age and sex showed no correlation with the nutritional risk; the concentration of albumin and body mass index and the index of nutritional risk were significantly associated (R2: 0.98 and 0.59, respectively). Conclusions: The prevalence of patients with nutritional risk is high in the hospital scope and it can be evaluated through the geriatric nutritional risk index(AU)

Effect of the preoperative Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index on the prognosis of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after radical resection / 中国肿瘤临床

Objective: To evaluate the prognostic value of the preoperative Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after radical resection. Methods: Clinicopathological and laboratory data of 315 elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who were older than 60 years and underwent radical resection in Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital from January 2008 to December 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. The GNRI formula was as follows:1.489×serum albumin (g/L)+41.7×(current body weight/ideal body weight). According to the GNRI, patients were divided into the normal and abnormal GNRI groups. The χ2 test was used to analyze the relationship between the GNRI and the clinicopathological char-acteristics of patients. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze the survival rate, and survival analysis was conducted using the Log-rank test. Multivariate survival analysis was conducted using the Cox proportional risk regression model. Results: There were 259 patients in the normal GNRI group (GNRI>98) and 56 patients in the abnormal GNRI group (GNRI≤98). The GNRI was closely correlated with age, tumor location, tumor diameter, serum albumin level, body mass index (BMI), and lymph node metastasis (all P<0.05). The 5-year survival rates in the normal and abnormal GNRI groups were 41.2% and 27.0%, respectively, with statistical significance (P=0.002). Univariate analysis showed that age, tumor diameter, serum albumin level, BMI, GNRI, platelet-lymphocyte ratio, tumor invasion depth, and lymph node metastasis were risk factors for the prognosis of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (all P<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that the preoperative GNRI (hazard ratio=0.687, 95% confidence interval: 0.487-0.968, P=0.032) was an independent factor affecting the prognosis of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Subgroup analysis showed that the survival rates in the normal GNRI group were significantly higher than those in the abnormal GNRI group (P=0.036 and 0.010, respectively), regardless of lymph node metastasis. Conclusions: The preoperative GNRI is associated with malignant biological behav-ior in elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and can be used as a useful indicator for predicting survival after radi-cal resection.

Value of the baseline Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index in evaluating the prognosis of maintenance peritoneal dialysis patients / 中华肾脏病杂志

Objective@#To explore the value of baseline geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) in evaluating the prognosis of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who underwent peritoneal dialysis (PD).@*Methods@#The clinical data of patients who underwent PD catheterization and started PD therapy at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 1, 2013 to December 30, 2018 were collected retrospectively. The follow-up endpoint was death or hemodialysis. The follow-up deadline was March 1, 2019. The GNRI cut-off value was determined according to the ROC curve, and the patients were divided into GNRI≤90.5 group and GNRI>90.5 group. The differences of clinical data and laboratory tests were compared between the two groups. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to compare the difference in PD rate between the two groups during follow-up, and the factors that affecting patients PD withdrawal were analyzed by Cox regression.@*Results@#The GNRI cut-off value was determined to be 90.5 based on the ROC curve. Until the deadline for follow-up, the drop-out rate of GNRI≤90.5 group was significantly higher than the GNRI>90.5 group (35.88% vs 21.58%, P=0.003). Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed a higher rate of maintaining PD in the GNRI>90.5 group than that in GNRI≤90.5 group during follow-up (P=0.021). Cox univariate regression showed that male, GNRI and serum Alb were protective factors for PD patients, and Scr was a risk factor. After multiple factors correction, male and GNRI were also the protective factors for PD patients.@*Conclusion@#As an objective indicator of nutritional evaluation, baseline GNRI can be used as a prognostic indicator for PD patients.

Correlation between geriatric nutritional risk index and vascular calcification in non- dialysis chronic kidney disease patients / 中国医师进修杂志

Objective To explore the correlation between geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) and vascular calcification in non- dialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. Methods One hundred and forty non- dialysis CKD patients from January 2016 to August 2017 were selected. Abdominal aortic calcification score was evaluated by lateral abdominal radiography, and the GNRI was calculated. The patients were divided into 4 groups according to the GNRI: non-nutritional risk group (37 cases), low nutritional risk group (34 cases), middle nutritional risk group (36 cases) and high nutritional risk group (33 cases). The risk factors leading to vascular calcification were analyzed statistically. Results The abdominal aortic calcification score in non- nutritional risk group, low nutritional risk group, middle nutritional risk group and high nutritional risk group was (3.58 ± 2.41), (10.50 ± 1.86), (16.25 ± 1.89) and (20.54 ± 1.92) scores, and there was statistical difference (P<0.05). Correlation analysis result showed that abdominal aortic calcification score was positively correlated with age and hypertension (r = 0.61 and 0.35, P = 0.001 and 0.003), and negatively correlated with estimated glomerular filtration rate and GNRI (r = - 0.36 and - 0.86, P = 0.002 and 0.000). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis result showed that age and GNRI were independent risk factors for abdominal aortic calcification in CKD patients (P<0.01). Conclusions GNRI is negatively correlated with vascular calcification in non- dialysis CKD patients. Strengthening nutritional management may prevent cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events.

Changes in geriatric nutritional risk index and risk of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events in incident peritoneal dialysis patients

BACKGROUND: Geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) is a validated nutritional assessment method, and lower GNRI values are closely associated with adverse clinical outcomes in dialysis patients. This study investigated the impact of changes in GNRI during the first year of dialysis on cardiovascular outcomes in incident peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. METHODS: We reviewed medical records in 133 incident PD patients to determine GNRI at the start of PD and after 12 months. Patients were categorized into improved (delta GNRI > 0) and worsening/stationary (delta GNRI ≤ 0) groups. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs). RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 51.1 months, the primary outcome was observed in 42 patients (31.6%). The baseline GNRI at PD initiation was not significantly associated with MACCEs (log-rank test, P = 0.40). However, the cumulative event-free rate was significantly lower in the worsening or stationary GNRI group than in the improved group (log-rank test, P = 0.004). Multivariate Cox analysis revealed that a worsening or stationary GNRI was independently associated with higher risk for MACCEs (hazard ratio, 2.47; 95% confidence interval, 1.15–5.29; P = 0.02). In subgroup analysis, patients with worsening or stationary GNRI were at significantly greater risk for MACCEs in both the lower (P = 0.04) and higher (P = 0.01) baseline GNRI groups. CONCLUSION: Baseline GNRI was not associated with MACCEs, but patients with deteriorating or stationary nutritional status were at significantly greater risk for MACCEs, suggesting that serial monitoring of nutritional status is important to stratify cardiovascular risk in incident PD patients.