Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Indian J Cancer ; 2016 Apr-June; 53(2): 239-243
Artigo em Inglês | IMSEAR | ID: sea-181621

RESUMO

AIM: Lymph node yield (LNY) is a valid marker of prognosis in oral cancer. Precise estimation of LNY in Indian patients with T3/T4 gingivobuccal sulcus squamous cell carcinoma (GBS‑SCC) has not been well documented. Hence, the primary objective of the study was to determine the LNY in patients with T3/T4 SCC of mandibular GBS, and the secondary objective was to study the association of LNY with clinicopathological factors such as tumor thickness, histological differentiation, number of positive nodes, and extracapsular spread (ECS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Study patients comprised biopsy proven T3/T4 SCC of mandibular GBS that underwent unilateral surgery (composite or bite composite resection with level I to level V‑neck dissection and pectoralis major flap reconstruction) at our center between January 2012 and October 2014. Grossing of surgical specimens was done as per the guidelines established by the Royal College of Pathologists (December 2009). The data were analyzed using SPSS software (22nd version) and Chi‑square test. RESULTS: The surgical specimens of 106 patients yielded 2329 lymph nodes with the mean LNY of 21.97 ± 5.57. Higher mean LNY of over 21 was significantly associated with ECS, number of positive nodes, delay in surgery over 15 days, skin involvement by the tumor, and presence of oral potentially malignant disorders. CONCLUSION: With the single surgeon, pathologist and same surgical procedure, the mean LNY in Indian patients with T3/T4 SCC of mandibular GBS is 21.97 ± 5.57. Although clinicopathological factors affect the estimation of LNY, further studies are needed to validate the findings of this study.

2.
Indian J Cancer ; 2015 Oct-Dec; 52(4): 611-615
Artigo em Inglês | IMSEAR | ID: sea-176300

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Buccal mucosa cancer involving masticator space is classified as very advanced local disease (T4b). The local recurrence rate is very high due to poor understanding of the extent of tumor spread in masticator space and technically difficult surgical clearance. The objective of this study is to understand the extent of tumor spread in masticator space to form basis for appropriate surgical resection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All consecutive patients with T4b‑buccal cancer underwent compartment resection, with complete anatomical removal of involved soft‑tissue structures. Specimens were systematically studied to understand the extent of invasion of various structures. The findings of clinical history, imaging and pathologic evaluation were compared and the results were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 45 patients with advanced buccal cancer (T4b) were included in this study. The skin, mandible and lymph nodes were involved in 30, 24 and 17 cases respectively. The pterygoid muscles were involved in 34 cases (medial‑pterygoid in 12 and both pterygoids in 22 cases) and masseter‑muscle in 32 cases. Average distance for soft‑tissue margins after compartment surgery was 2 cm and the margins were positive in 3 cases. The group with involvement of medial pterygoid muscle had safest margin with compartment surgery while it was also possible to achieve negative margins for group involving lateral pterygoid muscle and plates. The involvement of pterygomaxillary fissure was area of concern and margin was positive in 2 cases with one patient developing local recurrence with intracranial extension. At 21 months median follow‑up (13‑35 months), 38 patients were alive without disease while two developed local recurrence at the skull base.CONCLUSIONS: T4b buccal cancers have significant soft‑tissue involvement in the masticator space. En bloc removal of all soft‑tissues in masticator space is advocated to remove tumor contained within space. The compartment surgery provides an opportunity to achieve negative margins for cancers actually contained within masticator space.It is inappropriate to club all patients with masticator space involvement in one group.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA